Skin bleaching refers to the use of products to lighten dark areas of the skin or achieve an overall lighter complexion through the use of creams, soaps and pills, as well as professional treatments like chemical peels and laser therapy.
The practitioner, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told NAN that any bleaching cream used in high amount, more than five per cent could damage the skin, adding that it was good to keep the skin the way God created it than bleaching it.
The expert listed bleaching products to include hydroquinone, steroid cream (Clobetasol propionate) and mercury.
She explained that “hydroquinone is used for the treatment of skin conditions but when cleared, it is advisable to stop just like you take malaria medication and after a prescribed dose, you stop.
“The issue here is the quantity. If the formulation is small, it will not have effect but if it is high concentration, it can cause skin irritation and kidney damage.”
Similarly, she said, steroid cream (clobetasol propanote), which had strong lightening effect on the skin, could also damage the skin when abused.
“It is also used to treat many skin diseases such as psoariasis and contact dermatitis but after treatment, one should stop because of the adverse effect on the body.
“It can cause stretch mark, green veins and bumps on the face. It can also cause the person to add weight and later lead to hypertension,’’ she said.
According to her, mercury, another bleaching product, has been banned in the market, adding that it can cause kidney damage too.
Meanwhile, a cross section of Abuja residents who separately spoke with NAN, said bleaching the skin was alien to the Africa culture, noting that while people bleach to alter their skin colour, they should also think about the side effects.
Cherish Adewale, a corps member, said people bleach to impress others, especially the opposite sex, that is to make others feel they look good.
“It is not good to bleach because of its adverse effects on the skin like irritation, multiple colour skin and bad odour in some cases,’’ she said.
According to her, it will be good for government to ban bleaching creams so that people will not have any option than to appreciate their skin colour.
Similarly, Christine Eke, a student of University of Abuja, said people use bleaching cream because they were not proud of their skin.
“I support the move by the Senate on bleaching creams because it will make us tolerate our culture amidst ourselves and be proud of it.’’
For Christopher Uche, a Public Servant, some people bleach their skin because they are ignorant of its health implications.
However, a cosmetic seller in Abuja who would not want to be identified, said “bleaching is a choice and people should be allowed to decide if they want to tone, bleach or maintain their skin colour.”
He added that the demand for bleaching cream was increasing, “so, whatever people want, we give to them; we are in business, afterall, it is a matter of choice.”
Meanwhile, others described the Senate directive as an infringement on the fundamental rights of the citizenry.
Some said government could ban the importation of bleaching products, but it would be difficult to monitor the use, “as it may not be possible to go about arresting people presumed to be bleaching.”
A resident of Lugbe in Abuja, Mrs Mary Agbo, who commended the move, however, said “some people cannot live without bleaching creams.”
She stressed the need for government and experts to sensitise the public about the negative effects of bleaching, saying most people do it because they were not aware of its implications.
Ada Eze, a resident of Kubwa in the Federal Capital Territory, said although bleaching of the skin was a thing of choice, Nigerians should always be proud of their colour.
Eze said “it is okay if government regulates bleaching cream importation, but it should not be imposed because people bleach for many reasons.
“I don’t know why, but I have seen the case of some parents using bleaching creams on their children.”