Tag: Court

  • Court dismisses ex-terrorist negotiator’s plea for transfer from DSS to corrections custody

    Court dismisses ex-terrorist negotiator’s plea for transfer from DSS to corrections custody

     

     

    Flowerbudnews

    A Federal High Court, Abuja, on Monday dismissed the application filed by ex-terrorist negotiator, Tukur Mamu, seeking a transfer from the Department of the State Service (DSS) custody to Kuje Correctional Centre.

    Justice Inyang Ekwo, in a ruling, dismissed the application on the ground of insecurity of the custodial facility.

    Justice Ekwo held that Mamu did not deny the issue of incessant jailbreak in prisons which was raised by the Federal Government.

    The judge further held that any averment that was not controverted was deemed to be true.

    “And facts admitted need no further proof,” he added.

    He said in arriving at the decision, “the court takes into account the security of the custodial facility, health of the defendant and the type of the allegations contained in the charge sheet.”

    “I find that the averments of the complainant (FG) as it concerns jailbreak to be credible.

    “I find that this application lacks merit and I make an order dismissing it,” he declared.

    The judge, subsequently, ordered Mamu to remain in DSS custody throughout his trial in the alleged terrorism financing charges against him.

    Justice Ekwo, however, affirmed his earlier order that Mamu be allowed to have access to his personal physician for medical treatment subject to the supervision of the DSS medical personnel.

    “What the court does is to compel compliance. The complainant/respondent cannot be allowed to disobey court orders.

    “The complainant is hereby ordered to grant the defendant access to his personal physician,” he said.

    The matter was adjourned until June 3, June 4, June 5 and June 6 for continuation of trial.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Mamu was arraigned, on March 21, 2023, on 10 counts of terrorism financing, among others, but pleaded not guilty to the counts.

    Justice Ekwo, on April 27, 2023, declined to admit him to bail on the grounds of ill-health, after the DSS opposed the bail application.

    However, the judge, on Dec. 19, 2023, granted Mamu’s plea to have access to his own personal physician due to his alleged deteriorating health condition.

    Justice Ekwo, in the ruling, ordered that Mamu’s medical doctor should be allowed to treat him subject to the supervision of the DSS’ team of physicians.

    NAN reports that Mamu, who is standing trial over his alleged relationship with terrorists that were involved in the March 28, 2022 attack on an Abuja-Kaduna-bound train, was arrested on Sept. 6, 2022, by Interpol in Cairo, Egypt, on behalf of the Nigerian government.(NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

  • Court delivers judgment in suits against Secondus, Omehia, Opara July 15

    Court delivers judgment in suits against Secondus, Omehia, Opara July 15

     

    Flowerbudnews

    A Federal High Court, Abuja, on Tuesday, fixed July 15 for judgment in three suits filed against former Chairman of PDP, Uche Secondus, and two others, seeking an order restraining them from attending party’s executive meetings.

    Justice Inyang Ekwo fixed the date after lawyers to the parties adopted their processes and argued their case for and against the suit.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that three PDP members in Rivers had filed three separate suits against Secondus; sacked Governor of Rivers, Celestine Omehia, and former Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Austin Opara.

    The suit against Secondus and seven others, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/440/2024, was filed by Titus Jones.

    The second against Omehia and five others, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/436/2024 was filed by Precious Wobisike, while the third, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/438/2024 against Opara and seven others, was filed by Chisa Amadi.

    NAN reports that the judge had, on April 5, issued ex-parte orders, which among others, restrain the three PDP chieftains from attending any meeting of the National Executive Committee (NEC) and/or Board of Trustees (BoT) of the party, pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit.

    Justice Ekwo restrained them from participating in deliberations or proceedings of the meetings in any manner after the plaintiffs’ counsel, Joshua Musa, SAN, moved the motion to the effect.

    But Secondus, Omehia and Opara had applied that the execution of the orders be stayed pending the determination of the appeals they filed, challenging the ex-parte orders.

    However, Justice Ekwo, in a ruling, dismissed their applications seeking to set aside the interim order on the ground that their motions for stay of execution of the order were wrongly filed and therefore, incompetent.

    The judge held that under Order 26(9)(1) of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules (FHCCPR) 2019, what Secondus, Omehia and Opara ought to do was to apply to the court to either vary or discharge the orders, not to apply for stay.

    The judge said: “By Order 26 (9) (1) of the FHCCPR 2019, it is provided that where an order is made on a motion ex -parte, any person affected by it may, within seven days after service of it, or within such further time as the court shall allow, apply to the court by motion to vary or discharge it.”(NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

  • Court awards N200m fine against police over shooting, killing of 2 Shiites in Soba, Kaduna State

    Court awards N200m fine against police over shooting, killing of 2 Shiites in Soba, Kaduna State

     

    Flowerbudnews

    A Federal High Court sitting in Kaduna has ordered the police authorities to pay a cumulative sum of N200 million to the families of two Shiites killed by its officers while on Islamic procession on August 28, 2022 in Soba, Kaduna State.

    Justice Hawa Buhari, in a judgment on Monday, held that the “applicants’ rights as guaranteed under Sections 33, 38, 39, 40, 42 and 46 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended); Order 2, Rules 1, 2, 3, 4, 11 and 12 of the Fundamental Right (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009; Article 4, 8, 10, 11 and 12 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights 2004 is hereby enforced.”

    The judge held that the sum of N100 million which must be paid to each applicants, making a total of N200 million, as compensation and general damages, would attract a 10 per cent interest per anum until the amount is fully paid.

    Justice Buhari, in the judgement, consolidated the two separate suits filed by the two next-of-kins of the deceased, which are FHC/KD/CS/142/2022 and FHC/KD/CS/144/2022.

    “The sum of N100,000,000.00 (One Hundred Million Naira) be paid to each parents of the deceased as compensation and general damages with a 10 % interest per anum until the amount is fully paid.

    “The respondents shall tender a public apology to the applicants in one national daily for the breach of their fundamental right,” she declared.

    It would be recalled that two applicants; Iliyasu Bashir and and Ahmad Sa’ad had filed the suits marked: are FHC/KD/CS/144/2022 and FHC/KD/CS/142/2022 before the court.

    They alleged that on August 28, 2022, the officers of the Nigerian Police shot and killed Mubarak Iliyasu and Aminu Abdulkadir while observing their religious act of worship; Ashura Procession in Soba, Kaduna State.

    They had sued the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Assistant Inspector-General of Police Zone 7, Kaduna State Police Commissioner and Danial Pom, former Divisional Police Officer, Soba Division as 1st to 4th defendants respectively.

    The applicants, in the motions on notice dated and filed September 26, 2022 by their team of lawyers, including H.G Magashi, M.D Abubakar and Yusha’u S.U, sought seven reliefs.

    They sought a declaration that the shooting and killing of Mubarak Iliyasu and Aminu Abdulkadir on the said date while on religious procession was illegal, unconstitutional and flagrant violation of their fundamental right to life as guaranteed by Section 33 of the 1999 Constitution and Article 4 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Right Act Cap A9 LFN, 2004.

    They, therefore, prayed the court for an order mandating the respondents jointly and severally to pay to them the sum of N200 million each for violation of the fundamental rights of their deceased brothers.

    They equally sought an order, directing the respondents to tender a formal apology to them by publishing same in two national dailies that are circulating in northern Nigeria.

    But the respondents, in their preliminary objection dated and filed on November 8, 2022, sought an order striking out the suits for want of jurisdiction.

    Besides, they also filed a counter affidavit in opposing the suits

    But Justice Buhari agreed with the submission of the applicants’s counsel, and assumed jurisdiction on the matter.

    It would be recalled that Justice Buhari had equally ordered the police authorities, on April 22, 2024, to pay a cumulative sum of N300 million to three family members of three Shiite members killed by its officers while on Islamic procession on August 8, 2022 in Zaria City of Kaduna State.

  • Businessman slams N5bn alleged defamatory suit against journalist, others

    Businessman slams N5bn alleged defamatory suit against journalist, others

     

    Flowerbudnews

    A businessman, Alhaji Ibrahim Egungbohun, has filed a N5 billion suit against a journalist, Fisayo Soyombo; Foundation for Investigative Journalism (FIJ) and Arise Media Group, over allegations bordering on defamation.

    Egungbohun, in a suit field by his lawyer, Bola Aidi, SAN, before the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, also sought a N10 million cost of instituting the matter.

    In the writ of summons marked: FCT/CV/2286/2024 and filed on May 3, the claimant sued Soyombo, FIJ and Arise Media Group as 1st to 3rd defendants respectively.

    Egungbohun, a Nigerian Customs licensed agent, is the Chief Executive Officer of IBD Impex Ltd, a company which is into clearing and forwarding of goods, construction, agriculture, real estate and oil and gas.

    In the suit, he sought “a declaration that the claimant has been defamed by the 1st and 2nd defendants through the various libelous posts and innuendos made by the 1st and 2nd defendants on their X handles @fisayosoyombo and @fijnigeria.

    “A declaration that the claimant has been defamed by the 1st and 2nd defendants through the libelous publications made by the 1st and 2nd defendants on the 2nd defendant’s blog fij.ng in the article titled ‘Undercover as a Smuggler’ published on 21st February 2024.

    “A declaration that the claimant has been defamed by the 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants through the libelous publication/broadcasting made by the defendants on the 3rd defendant’s television programme ‘THE MORNING SHOW’ broadcasted on 24th February, 2024.

    “An order of this court for retraction of the libelous statements and tendering of public apology by each of the defendants to the claimant, to be published by the 1st and 2nd defendants on their X handles; @fisayosoyombo and @fijnigeria and on the 2nd defendant’s blog fij.ng, and to be published/broadcasted by all the defendants in the 3rd defendant’s television programme ‘THE MORNING SHOW.’

    “An order of this court restraining the defendants from any further defamatory publications (including the use of innuendos) against the claimant on their X handles, website, TV programmes or any other means of publication.

    “The sum of N5,000,000,000.00 (Five Billion Naira) as general damages. The sum of N10,000,000, 000.00 (Ten Million Naira) being the cost of instituting this Suit.”

    In his statement of claim attached to the suit, Egungbohun, who hails from Ogun, said he is a socialite and also the owner of IBD International Hotel in Ogun.

    According to him, his hard work, integrity, dedication and tenacity has given him business goodwill among well-meaning Nigerians and has enabled him to establish business and personal relationships with top Nigerian businessmen and politicians.

    He averred that sometime in February 2024, Soyombo began a calumny of defamation against him through his X handle page; @fisayosoyombo.

    He alleged that on Feb 21, Soyombo posted and shared on his X handle page a defamatory article titled: “Undercover as a Smuggler” and published on the FIJ’s blog wherein he was tagged a smuggler.

    The claimant further alleged that the said article had a subcaption: “Popular Socialite Arrested For Gun Running, Ibrahim IBD Dende Regains Freedom.”

    He said in the article, they alleged that, “The status of the founder of the hotel, Ibrahim Dende Egungbohun, more commonly known as IBD Dende’, as ILARO’S BIGGEST SMUGGLER, has been helped by his proximity to power, coupled with the influence he has amassed with his wealth.

    “,..Beyond the LAUNDERED IMAGE of him in the media, however, the real Dende HAS BEEN ARRESTED FOR SMUGGLING MULTIPLE TIMES; but on each occasion, he emerged unscathed. He is that connected.

    “,..Dende used to import Turkey, but he subsequently SMUGGLED GUNS and his cover was blown… Dende also SMUGGLED CARS, his patronage transcending the political class.

    “As he entrenched his interests in the SHADY TRADE through the years, he started to build a legion of foot soldiers to perfect the DIRTY WORK on his behalf.

    “Some of those boys whom Jide knew personally were bringing in high-value automobiles STASHED WITH ARMS AND AMMUNITION ON DENDE’S BEHALF when they were apprehended in 2018.”

    Egungbohun averred that the defamatory and character assassinating posts made against him by the defendants are permanent in nature.

    According to him, permanence of the publication means that the claimant’s good name and reputation has been smeared for life by the libelous posts of the defendants.

    He said he would rely on all electronic generated evidence mentioned in his statement of claim and would rely on and tender a Certificate of Compliance in line with the provision of the Evidence Act during trial.

    The matter is yet to be assigned to a judge as at the time of filing the report.(NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

  • Court evicts Aqua Rapha Coy from Enugu depot over rent default

    Court evicts Aqua Rapha Coy from Enugu depot over rent default

     

    By Flowerbudnews
    An Enugu North Magistrate Court, on Friday, executed a Warrant for Possession of Premises occupied by Aqua Rapha Investment Company Ltd for a wholesale business in Enugu.

    The company used the rented apartment at No. 4 Savage Crescent, GRA, Enugu as depot for distribution of her products at the heart of Enugu metropolis but allegedly defaulted in paying the rent.

    The eviction, which lasted several hours, saw the company’s products, equipment, files and other documents evacuated from the building and dumped on the major road just opposite Shoprite main gate in Enugu.

    While executing the eviction order, the court bailiff also recovered a sales vault containing a total cash of N773,520 before sealing and putting the building, which hitheto served as wholesale apartment of the company, under lock and key.

    Explaining what led to the eviction, the Counsel to Dr and Mrs Ben Ogbu, Barr. James Edeh, said that his client the property owners, are tried of the unfaithfulness of the managers of the company in paying agreed rent as contained in the signed tenancy agreement.

    Edeh noted that the company failed to abide fully with the initial three years tenancy agreement entered into in 2016 which elapsed in 2018.

    “The company failed to pay an agreed installment of N300,000 meant for school fees for 2017 and 2018 after paying that of 2016 and lump sum of the tenancy agreement,” he said.

    According to him, “even when the initial agreed tenancy elapsed in 2018, the company find it difficult to come and renegotiate the agreement but waited after we took them to court to come drop N4 million without renegotiate or signing a fresh agreement to be supervised by me.”

    He said: “Before paying the N4 million after being in oblivion for some years, the company representative, Mr Nwankwo, was instructed to meet with me as the lawyer managing the property but he did not abide by the simple instruction.

    “We have been in court since 2020 on this matter and we have repeatedly served the company and its lawyers; they only appeared once and no more. After waiting and being patient for many years, the court issued a Warrant for Possession of Premises by the original owner.”

    Reacting, the counsel to Aqua Rapha Investment company Ltd, Barr. Fidelis Okeke, said that the eviction was unfair, adding: “This is unlawful execution”.

    According to Okeke, the company is up to date with its rent payment. We have paid everything.

    “I will go back to my chamber and study everything concerning this embarrassing execution and I will assure you it will not stand. By Monday, I will be in court to challenge this.

    “The company will surely seek redress in court and claim huge damages for this insult and reputation damage,” he said.

  • Lawyer begins alleged contempt proceedings against MultiChoice Abuja manager

    Lawyer begins alleged contempt proceedings against MultiChoice Abuja manager

     

    Flowerbudnews
    A lawyer, Festus Onifade, on Tuesday, commenced contempt proceedings against Mr Mohammed Sani, Manager of Abuja office of Multi-Choice Nigeria Ltd, over alleged disobedience to the order made by the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal (CCPT).

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the CCPT presided over by Saratu Shafii had, on April 29, made an interim order, restraining the pay-TV firm from increasing DStv and Gotv tariffs scheduled to begin on May 1, pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit.

    The three-member tribunal gave the order following an ex-parte motion moved by Ejiro Awaritoma, counsel for the claimant, Onifade.

    Onifade, the claimant and a subscriber, had sued MultiChoice and Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) as 1st and 2nd defendants.

    However, despite the order, the company, on May 1, hiked the subscription rates for its DStv and GOtv packages.

    Meanwhile, a Notice of Consequence of Disobedience to Order of Court (Form 48) marked: CCPT/OP/02/2024 dated and filed on May 7, warned Sani against disregard to the tribunal order.

    It rears in part: “Take notice that unless you obey the under listed order of the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal, Abuja given on the 29th day of April, 2024; thus:

    “An order restraining the 1st defendant/respondent either by itself, agents, representatives, officers or privies, howsoever described from carrying out the impending increase in tariffs and cost of its products and services intended to take effect from 1st May, 2024, until the hearing and determination of the motion on notice already filed before this tribunal.

    “You will be guilty of contempt of this tribunal and will be committed to prison.”

    Also in a motion on notice dated and filed May 7, Onifade sought an order of the tribunal, directing MultiChoice to pay the sum of N1 billion “or any amount the tribunal deem may fit appropriate in this circumstance for deliberately disobeying, contravening, and failure to comply with the interim order” granted on April 29.

    Given eight-ground of argument, the lawyer said despite the order which was validly served on MultiChoice on April 29, the firm deliberately neglected the order and willfully increased the tariffs of its products and services on May 1.

    He alleged that the company had an history of disobeying court/tribunal orders.

    In the affidavit attached to the application, the claimant gave history of the company’s disobedience to court orders in previous similar circumstances in the country.

    He said in 2015, Justice C. J Aneke of Federal High Court (FHC), Ikeja-Lagos gave an order restraining the company from increasing the prices of its products and services, but it went ahead and increased in-spite of the order of the court.

    He saiid in 2018, Justice Nnamdi Dimgba of FHC, Abuja granted an order obtained by Consumer Protection Council (CPC) now FCCPC, restraining the firm from increasing it prices of products pending the matter before it, but the order was not obeyed.

    According to him, the actions and attitude of Ist defendant was very reprehensible that the then CPC now FCCPC described it as a violation to the rights of Nigeria consumers and those increases done then were in bad faith.

    Besides, the lawyer said in 2022, the tribunal granted an order on March 22, 2022 restraining MultiChoice from increasing its tariffs but it went ahead with the tariff hike on April 1, claiming it was a completed act.

    He argued that despite the service and receipt of the order, the company, in flagrant and willful disobedient of the order, still went ahead without recourse to the plight of the customer and increased the tariffs of its services and products on May 1.

    Onifade said the firm filed a motion before the tribunal dated April 29 but filed April 30, claiming that “the matter before the court is res judicata and completed act.”

    According to him, the non-compliances with the order of the tribunal granted on the 29th April, 2024 is deliberate and an affront to the jurisdiction of this Honourable Tribunal and has brought untold hardship on the claimant.

    The lawyer, who said the tribunal had the discretionary powers to grant the application, said it was in the interest of justice to grant his request

    Meanwhile, when the matter was called on Tuesday, Onifade told the tribunal that the matter was slated for hearing of his motion on notice.

    However, counsel for the Multichoice, Moyosore Onigbanjo, SAN, said he filed an application on April 30 challenging the jurisdiction of the tribunal to make the order it made on April 29.

    Besides, the senior lawyer said he also filed a memorandum of conditional appearance on same date.

    He argued that where the jurisdcition of the court is challenged, the issue had to be decided before proceeding on other matters.

    Lawyer to the FCCPC (2nd defendant), M. Adeke, said though he had been served with the processes in the matter, he sought an adjournment to enable the commission respond to all the applications served on it.

    Onigbanjo equally sought an adjournment to enable him respond to fresh processes served on him by Onifade.

    He, however, insisted that where the issue of jurudiction is raised, such must be address first.

    Onifade did not oppose the application for adjournment and the tribunal, presided over by Thomas Okosun, adjourned the matter until May 16 for hearing.(NAN)(www.nannnews.ng)

  • Alleged $9.6bn P&ID scam: Court adjourns suit against fleeing Briton, coys for judgment

    Alleged $9.6bn P&ID scam: Court adjourns suit against fleeing Briton, coys for judgment

     

     

    Flowerbudnews

    A Federal High Court, Abuja, on Monday, adjourned two separate money laundering suits filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against British national, James Nolan, and two other companies for judgment.

    Justice Donatus Okorowo adjourned the suits for judgment after counsel for the EFCC, Bala Sanga, and the defence lawyer, Michael Ajara, adopted their final written addresses and made their submissions in the matters.

    In his argument, Ajara prayed the court to dismiss the two suit for lack of jurisdiction.

    The.lawyer insisted that the court lacked jurisdiction because the charges were defective.

    Besides, he said all the evidence brought forward by the anti-graft agency, through its witnesses, were hearsay.

    But Sanga disagreed with Ajara

    The EFCC lawyer argued that under Section 220 of Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015, the irregularity of a charge does not affect the jurisdiction of the court and neither does it affect the validity of the charge.

    He added that Ajara’s objection was belated as this should have been raised during arraignment.

    Sanga equally argued that the matter cannot be caught up by hearsay rules because documents obtained by the prosecution’s investigating officers were visible in evidence.

    He submitted that knowledge derived from day-to-day work are not hearsay.

    The lawyer prayed the court to convict the defendants and order the forfeiture of the companies’ assets to the Federal Government.

    After proceedings that lasted till Monday evening, Justice Okorowo adjourned the matters for judgment

    The judge said that the judgment date would be communicated to parties in the suits.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the court had, on April 14, fixed today for adoption of the final addresses after Nolan, who jumped bail and fled Nigeria in the alleged 9.6 billion dollars Process and Industrial Development (P&ID) Ltd scandal, opened his defence in absentia without calling any witness.

    Ajara had told the judge that he did not intend to call any witness upon resumed hearing.

    He said after his evaluation of the EFCC’s evidence, he would rely on the case of the prosecution and Sanga did not object, upon which the matter was fixed for adoption of written addresses.

    NAN reports that the EFCC is prosecuting Trinity Biotech Nigeria Limited and Nolan in the charged marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/272/2022 as 1st and 2nd defendants in the case.

    Also, the commission is also prosecuting the sister case marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/273/2022 filed against Resorts Express Concept Nigeria Ltd, another company, and Corrado Fantoli as 1st and 2nd defendants respectively before Okorowo.

    Fantoli, also a foreigner and an associate of Nolan, was one of the suspects behind the alleged $9.6 billion P&ID fraud.

    The suspect, said to be at large, alongside the company, was arraigned in absentia on Nov. 25, 2022, on eight-count money laundering charge.

    He was not present in court or represented by a lawyer when they were arraigned.

    The court also declared him wanted and ordered for his arrest anywhere he is sighted after Sanga made application to the effect.

    Fantoli and Giovanna Beccarelli, who had also been declared wanted and an arrest warrant issued against her, were said to be directors and signatories to the company’s Guaranty Trust Bank account number: 0123849451.

    Resorts Express Concept Nigeria Ltd and Trinity Biotech Nigeria Limited are two of the over 30 companies associated with the $9.6 billion scam.

    NAN reports that other cases linked to the scandal are currently before Justice Obiora Egwuatu, Justice Zainab Abubakar of FHC, Abuja, besides other charges at FCT High Courts.

    In addition the anti-graft agency was also prosecuting some of the companies and Nolan before Justice Ahmed Mohammed before he was elevated to the Appeal Court.

    A Business and Property Court in London presided over by Justice Robin Knowles of the Commercial Courts of England and Wales had, in October, quashed the 11 billion dollars awarded against Nigeria in a case filed by the P&ID.

    Judge Knowles held that the award was obtained by fraud and that what had happened in the case was contrary to public policy.(NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

  • Court adjourns Ali Bello, co-defendant’s case until June 19

    Court adjourns Ali Bello, co-defendant’s case until June 19

     

    Flowerbudnews

    A Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday adjourned an amended money-laundering charge instituted against Ali Bello and his co-defendant, Daudu Sulaiman, by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) until June 19.

    Justice James Omotosho adjourned the matter for trial continuation after the EFCC’s counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, led Olom Otane Egoro, a witness, in evidence.

    At the resumed hearing, Oyedepo presented Egoro, a staff of Access Bank from the Compliance Unit, as the 6th prosecution witness (PW6) of the Commission.

    The banker told the court that the EFCC, via a letter, requested for the bank statement of the Kogi State Government House, for the period of 2018 to 2021.

    He said the commission also asked for other documents, including the account opening mandate for the account and certificate of compliance in respect of the printouts.

    Oyedepo tendered the documents through the witness and were admitted in evidence accordingly.

    Though both counsel to the 1st defendant (Ali Bello), Abubakar Aliyu, SAN, and that of the 2nd defendant, Olusegun Jolaawo, SAN, objected to the admissibility of the documents, they elected to raise the points of objection at the final address stage.

    The witness thereafter went through the statement of account, detailing the various deposits into and withdrawals from same via transfers and cash.

    From his evidence, Egoro said the withdrawals were not more than N10 million at any point.

    The witness also did not state who deposited the monies, what the monies were deposited for or who withdrew the same and for what purpose before concluding his testimony for the day.

    Although the matter was initially fixed for May 7 for trial continuation, Aliyu prayed the court for an adjournment on health grounds.

    Tye senior lawyer equally prayed the court to vacate tomorrow’s date.

    Oyedepo and Jolaawo did not oppose Aliyu’s application.

    Justice Omotosho, by agreement of counsel, adjourned the matter until June 19 and June 20 for continuation of trial.

    It would be recalled that Ali Bello and Dauda Suleiman, in the charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/550/2022, are standing trial on a 10-count charge bordering on money laundering brought against them by the anti-graft agency.

    They, however, pleaded not guilty to all the counts.(NAN)(www nannews.ng)

  • May Day: CISLAC backs NLC, TUC’s clamour for living wage

    May Day: CISLAC backs NLC, TUC’s clamour for living wage

     

    Flowerbudnews

    As Nigerian workers joined the rest of the world in celebrating this year’s May Day, the Civil Society Legislature Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) said it actively supports their fight for a minimum wage that reflects the rising cost of living and ensures their ability to support themselves and their families.

    The Executive Director of CISLAC, Mr Auwal Ibrahim Rafsanjani, stated this in a statement on Wednesday in Abuja on the occasion to mark International Workers’ Day.

    “Additionally, CISLAC prioritises improved working
    conditions, particularly within the informal sector, where workers often face exploitation and a lack of basic protections,” he said.

    A cording to him, CISLAC will continue to be a vocal champion for Nigerian workers through impactful research, strategic advocacy campaigns, and by providing legal representation for vulnerable workers seeking justice.

    “We believe that empowered workers are the cornerstone of a thriving nation,” he said.

    Rafsanjani reiterated the organisation’s unwavering commitment to advocating for Nigerian workers’ rights and well-being.

    “As the world commemorates International Workers’ Day, the Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) Executive Director, Auwal Ibrahim Musa Rafsanjani, joins the Nigerian people in recognising the immense contributions of Nigerian workers to our nation’s progress.

    “The Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC), the Nigeria Chapter of Transparency International, extends its heartfelt appreciation to the Nigerian workforce, the bedrock of the nation’s socio-economic progress,” he said.

    He noted that this year’s International Workers’ Day found Nigerian workers navigating a complex landscape.

    He said CISLAC recognised the ongoing struggle many Nigerian workers face in securing a living wage amidst a
    challenging economic climate.

    He said the rising cost of living continues to disproportionately impact working families, threatening their ability to meet basic needs.

    “However, amidst these challenges, Nigerian workers have consistently demonstrated remarkable resilience and resourcefulness.

    “Their unwavering dedication keeps the wheels
    of the nation turning, fostering growth and development across all sectors.

    “CISLAC applauds the ingenuity and work ethic ingrained in the Nigerian workforce.

    “CISLAC recognises the critical role Nigerian workers play in every facet of the nation’s development,” he said