Tag: Coup

  • Judge bars journalists from covering suspected coup plotters’ trial

    Judge bars journalists from covering suspected coup plotters’ trial

     

    Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court (FHC) in Abuja, on Monday barred journalists from covering the trial of six suspected coup plotters being tried by the Federal Government.

    Some of the journalists had arrived at the court a little after 8am and secured seats thereafter on the last row, awaiting the commencement of court’s sitting.

    Few minutes to 9am, an official of the court announced that those who were unable to secure a seat should vacate the courtroom because the judge would not allow anyone to stand when the court starts sitting.

    While those without seats, including lawyers, were making their way out of the courtroom, another official of the court and a security personnel attached to the court came to where journalists were sitting and asked them to stand up and exit the courtroom immediately.

    When asked why, they said the presiding judge, Justice Abdulmalik, gave them the instruction not to allow journalists inside her court.

    When th newsmen told the court workers that the trial of the alleged coup plotters was of public importance and that there was no court order that proceedings should be conducted without media presence, the officials insisted they were acting on the judge’s instruction.

    Shortly after the journalists were successfully evicted, the security official locked the door.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), however, observed that Mr Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, later arrived at the FHC at about 10:35am, and headed to Court 6, venue of the trial.

    It would be recalled that Justice Abdulmalik had, on Jan. 23, walked out a reporter from NAN from covering the two separate suits filed by a Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) loyal to the Minister of FCT, Nyesom Wike, and the Kabiru Turaki-led leadership of the PDP, which had now been decided by the court.

    When the judge came in and saw the reporter standing by a side in the courtroom, she asked: “May I know who you are?”

    When the reporter responded that he is a journalist, she ordered him out of the courtroom since the reporter could not secure a seat.

    NAN reports that Justice Abdulmalik had, April 22, ordered the remand of the alleged coup plotters in the Department of State Services (DSS) custody.

    The judge, in a ruling, also ordered accelerated hearing in the case.

    Justice Abdulmalik equally ordered the DSS to give the lawyers and family members access to the defendants within a reasonable time.

    The judge then adjourned the matter until April 27 for commencement of trial and for hearing of the bail applications of the defendants.

    The order followed the arraignment of the six defendants by the AGF on behalf of the Federal Government.

    The Federal Government had filed a 13-count charge, marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/206/2026, against the defendants.

    The suspects are retired Maj-Gen. Mohammed Ibrahim Gana, retired Capt. (NN) Erasmus Ochegobia Victor , Insp Ahmed Ibrahim, Zekeri Umoru, Bukar Kashim Goni and Abdulkadir Sani, listed as 1st to 6th defendants respectively.

    Although the former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva, is not named as a defendant in the charge, he is listed as being at large.

    The defendants were accused of alleged treason and terrorism, including failure to disclose security intelligence and money laundering linked to terrorism financing, among other charges.

    The matter in currently ongoing as at the time of filing the report.

  • Alleged coup: FG set to arraign 6 suspects

    Alleged coup: FG set to arraign 6 suspects

     

    The Federal Government is set to arraign six suspected coup plotters.

    The case is listed on number 14 on the Wednesday’s cause list before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik.

    The Federal Government, through the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), had filed the charge, marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/206/2026, against the defendants.

    The suspects are Maj-Gen. Mohammed Ibrahim Gana (rtd), Cap. (NN) Erasmus Ochegobia Victor (rtd), Insp Ahmed Ibrahim, Zekeri Umoru, Bukar Kashim Goni and Abdulkadir Sani, listed as 1st to 6th defendants respectively.

    Although the former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva, is not named as a defendant in the charge, he is listed as being at large.

    Meanwhile, as at the time of filing this report, only Abdulkadir Sani, the 6th suspect and a cleric in Zaria, Kaduna State, was in court.

    Other suspects are yet to be brought to court.

    The charge before Justice Abdulmalik, dated and filed on April 20 by the Director, Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, accused the defendants of alleged treason and terrorism.

    The defendants were also accused of failure to disclose security intelligence and money laundering linked to terrorism financing.

    At the centre of the case is an allegation that the defendants conspired in 2025 to undermine the Nigerian state.

    They were alleged to have conspired with one another to levy war against the state to overawe the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    The offence is said to be punishable under Section 37(2) of the Criminal Code.

    The case is yet to be called as at the time of filing this report.
    ========

     

    Details later

  • Coup: Court orders DIA to produce Sheikh Zaria in court, Feb. 18

     

    The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Friday, ordered the Defence Intelligence Agency, (DIA) to produce Sheikh Abdulkadir Zaria in court on Feb. 18.

    Justice Peter Lifu gave the order on Friday while ruling on the fundamental rights enforcement suit filed against the respondents by Zaria seeking his release from detention since December 2025, following his alleged involvement in the attempted coup against President Bola Tinubu.

    The respondents listed in the suit are the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC), the DIA, the Attorney-General of the Federation and Jaiz Bank.

    Sheikh, a Zaria-based Islamic scholar, was arrested by the EFCC and handed over to the DIA on allegations bordering on coup plotting.

    His family raised the alarm over his disappearance after he travelled to Abuja following the alleged blockage of his bank account.

    In his ruling, Justice Lifu held that having perused the case, the facts remained that Zaria was arrested by the EFCC and handed over to DIA for safe keeping.

    Justice Lifu also said that Zaria had been in confinement since December 11 and had no access to his family and that an alleged detention order obtained by the respondents was neither exhibited or produced from the bar.

    The judge held that as the case stood, there was no detention order authorising the applicant’s detention in a military facility as no judge or court was named to have issued it even after a three-hour stand down of the case.

    He also held that the applicant from all the processes filed, was a civilian with no military background.

    He therefore ordered the agency to produce the applicant in court for the purpose of admitting him to bail.

    The court had ordered the respondents in the fundamental rights enforcement suit to show cause why the reliefs sought by Zaria should not be granted.

    The court, in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/55/26, had on February 6 directed the respondents to respond within 72 hours and fixed February 12 for continuation of hearing.

    Counsel to the applicant, Mr Abdul Aliyu, SAN, had on Thursday informed the court that the respondents claimed to have obtained a court order authorising the Sheikh’s detention.

    He, however, said that there was no such order even as the respondents had failed to produce same.

    He also said that the argument of the respondents that they were keeping his client in safe custody was not tenable as it was unknown to law.

    “They are saying they are keeping him in safe custody but I have perused the Defence Intelligence Agency Act.

    “I know that their duties do not include keeping in safe custody people being investigated by the Special Investigation Panel,’’ he said.

    The senior lawyer further contended that the argument of the respondents that his client would interfere with investigation or jump bail if released was baseless.

    He said that they had not placed any evidence before the court to that effect.

    He prayed the court to grant the prayers of his client but where the court was not minded to grant the prayers, the court should order that he be produced in court on the next adjourned date.

    For his part, counsel to the EFCC, Mr M.C Odimbaiwe told the court that the applicant was not in EFCC custody.

    Odimbaiwe told the court that the applicant was handed over to the DIA and that efforts were being made to find the nexus between the applicant and the EFCC.

    When the judge sought to know for how long they had been trying to make the connection, the lawyer said that the legal unit of the commission had written to the investigation unit but was yet to receive a reply.

    Counsel to the DIA, Mr I.O Odom told the court that he had filed a 19 -paragraph affidavit praying the court not to grant the applicant’s application.

    Odom told the court that contrary to the argument of the applicant, there was indeed a valid court order obtained before he was detained.

    He, however, said that he didn’t attach the order to his processes due to security reasons because of the sensitive nature of the case but he declined to say what the case was about in court.

    The trial judge stood the matter down for three hours to enable Odom produce the said order.

    Upon resumption, he informed the court that he was unable to obtain the document, explaining that the Chairman of the Special Investigative Panel was out of the country and would return on Thursday.

    He was also unable to provide the name of the judge who allegedly issued the detention order or the court that granted it.

    The judge then adjourned the matter until February 13 (Friday) for ruling.

    The suit was brought over alleged violation of Sheikh Zaria’s fundamental rights, including his rights to personal liberty and dignity of the human person.

    It also borders on the breech of his right to fair hearing and freedom of movement, as guaranteed under the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

  • Coup: Court orders DIA to produce Sheikh Zaria in court, Feb. 18

    Coup: Court orders DIA to produce Sheikh Zaria in court, Feb. 18

     

     

    The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Friday, ordered the Defence Intelligence Agency, (DIA) to produce Sheikh Abdulkadir Zaria in court on Feb. 18.

    Justice Peter Lifu gave the order on Friday while ruling on the fundamental rights enforcement suit filed against the respondents by Zaria seeking his release from detention since December 2025, following his alleged involvement in the attempted coup against President Bola Tinubu.

    The respondents listed in the suit are the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC), the DIA, the Attorney-General of the Federation and Jaiz Bank.

    Sheikh, a Zaria-based Islamic scholar, was arrested by the EFCC and handed over to the DIA on allegations bordering on coup plotting.

    His family raised the alarm over his disappearance after he travelled to Abuja following the alleged blockage of his bank account.

    In his ruling, Justice Lifu held that having perused the case, the facts remained that Zaria was arrested by the EFCC and handed over to DIA for safe keeping.

    Justice Lifu also said that Zaria had been in confinement since December 11 and had no access to his family and that an alleged detention order obtained by the respondents was neither exhibited or produced from the bar.

    The judge held that as the case stood, there was no detention order authorising the applicant’s detention in a military facility as no judge or court was named to have issued it even after a three-hour stand down of the case.

    He also held that the applicant from all the processes filed, was a civilian with no military background.

    He therefore ordered the agency to produce the applicant in court for the purpose of admitting him to bail.

    The court had ordered the respondents in the fundamental rights enforcement suit to show cause why the reliefs sought by Zaria should not be granted.

    The court, in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/55/26, had on February 6 directed the respondents to respond within 72 hours and fixed February 12 for continuation of hearing.

    Counsel to the applicant, Mr Abdul Aliyu, SAN, had on Thursday informed the court that the respondents claimed to have obtained a court order authorising the Sheikh’s detention.

    He, however, said that there was no such order even as the respondents had failed to produce same.

    He also said that the argument of the respondents that they were keeping his client in safe custody was not tenable as it was unknown to law.

    “They are saying they are keeping him in safe custody but I have perused the Defence Intelligence Agency Act.

    “I know that their duties do not include keeping in safe custody people being investigated by the Special Investigation Panel,’’ he said.

    The senior lawyer further contended that the argument of the respondents that his client would interfere with investigation or jump bail if released was baseless.

    He said that they had not placed any evidence before the court to that effect.

    He prayed the court to grant the prayers of his client but where the court was not minded to grant the prayers, the court should order that he be produced in court on the next adjourned date.

    For his part, counsel to the EFCC, Mr M.C Odimbaiwe told the court that the applicant was not in EFCC custody.

    Odimbaiwe told the court that the applicant was handed over to the DIA and that efforts were being made to find the nexus between the applicant and the EFCC.

    When the judge sought to know for how long they had been trying to make the connection, the lawyer said that the legal unit of the commission had written to the investigation unit but was yet to receive a reply.

    Counsel to the DIA, Mr I.O Odom told the court that he had filed a 19 -paragraph affidavit praying the court not to grant the applicant’s application.

    Odom told the court that contrary to the argument of the applicant, there was indeed a valid court order obtained before he was detained.

    He, however, said that he didn’t attach the order to his processes due to security reasons because of the sensitive nature of the case but he declined to say what the case was about in court.

    The trial judge stood the matter down for three hours to enable Odom produce the said order.

    Upon resumption, he informed the court that he was unable to obtain the document, explaining that the Chairman of the Special Investigative Panel was out of the country and would return on Thursday.

    He was also unable to provide the name of the judge who allegedly issued the detention order or the court that granted it.

    The judge then adjourned the matter until February 13 (Friday) for ruling.

    The suit was brought over alleged violation of Sheikh Zaria’s fundamental rights, including his rights to personal liberty and dignity of the human person.

    It also borders on the breech of his right to fair hearing and freedom of movement, as guaranteed under the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

  • A MORNING OF CARNAGE

    A MORNING OF CARNAGE

     

     

    By Femi Fani-Kayode

    Sixty years ago, in the early hours of the morning of January 15th 1966, a coup d’etat took place in Nigeria which resulted in the murder of a number of leading political figures and senior army officers.

    This was the first coup in the history of our country and 98 per cent of the officers that planned and led it were from a particular ethnic nationality in the country.

    According to Max Siollun, a notable and respected historian whose primary source of information was the Police report compiled by the Police’s Special Branch after the failure of the coup, during the course of the investigation and after the mutineers had been arrested and detained, names of the leaders of the mutiny were as follows:

    Major Emmanuel Arinze Ifeajuna,

    Major Chukwuemeka Kaduna Nzeogwu,

    Major Chris Anuforo,

    Major Tim Onwutuegwu,

    Major Chudi Sokei,

    Major Adewale Ademoyega,

    Major Don Okafor,

    Major John Obieno,

    Captain Ben Gbuli,

    Captain Emmanuel Nwobosi,

    Captain Chukwuka,

    and Lt. Oguchi.

    It is important to point out that I saw the Special Branch report myself and I can confirm Siollun’s findings.

    These were indeed the names of ALL the leaders of the January 15th 1966 mutiny and all other lists are FAKE.

    The names of those that they murdered in cold blood or abducted were as follows.

    Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, the Prime Minister of Nigeria (murdered),

    Sir Ahmadu Bello, the Sardauna of Sokoto and the Premier of the Old Northern Region (murdered),

    Sir Kashim Ibrahim, the Shettima of Borno and the Governor of the Old Northern Region (abducted),

    Chief Samuel Ladoke Akintola, the Aare Ana Kakanfo of Yorubaland and the Premier of the Old Western Region (murdered),

    Chief Remilekun Adetokunboh Fani-Kayode SAN, Q.C. CON, the Balogun of Ife, the Deputy Premier of the Old Western Region, the Regional Minister for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs and my beloved father (abducted),

    Chief Festus Samuel Okotie-Eboh, the Oguwa of the Itsekiris and the Minister of Finance of Nigeria (murdered),

    Brigadier Samuel Adesujo Ademulegun, Commander of the 1st Brigade, Nigerian Army (murdered),

    Brigadier Zakariya Maimalari, Commander of the 2nd Brigade, Nigerian Army (murdered),

    Colonel James Pam (murdered),

    Colonel Ralph Sodeinde (murdered),

    Colonel Arthur Unegbe (murdered),

    Colonel Kur Mohammed (murdered),

    Lt. Colonel Abogo Largema (murdered),

    Alhaja Hafsatu Bello, the wife of the Sardauna of Sokoto (murdered),

    Alhaji Zarumi, traditional bodyguard of the Sardauna of Sokoto (murdered),

    Mrs. Lateefat Ademulegun, the wife of Brigadier Ademulegun who was 8 months pregnant at the time (murdered),

    Ahmed B. Musa (murdered),

    Ahmed Pategi (murdered),

    Sgt. Daramola Oyegoke (murdered),

    Police Constable Yohana Garkawa (murdered),

    Police Constable Musa Nimzo (murdered),

    Police Constable Akpan Anduka (murdered),

    Police Constable Hagai Lai (murdered),

    and Police Constable Philip Lewande (murdered).

    In order to reflect the callousness of the mutineers permit me to share under what circumstances some of their victims were murdered and abducted.

    Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa was abducted from his home, beaten, mocked, tortured, forced to drink alcohol, humiliated and murdered after which his body was dumped in a bush along the Lagos-Abeokuta road.

    Sir Ahmadu Bello was killed in the sanctity of his own home with his wife Hafsatu and his loyal security assistant Zurumi.

    Zurumi drew his sword to defend his principal whilst Hafsatu threw her body over her dear husband in an attempt to protect him from the bullets.

    Chief S. L. Akintola was gunned down as he stepped out of his house in the presence of his family and Chief Festus Okotie-Eboh was beaten, brutalised, abducted from his home, maimed and murdered and his body was dumped in a bush.

    …Brigadier Zakariya Maimalari had held a cocktail party in his home the evening before which was attended by some of the young officers that went back to his house early the following morning and murdered him.

    Brigadier Samuel Ademulegun was shot to death at home, in his bedroom and in his matrimonial bed along with his eight-month pregnant wife Lateefat.

    Colonel Shodeinde was murdered in Ikoyi hotel whilst Col. Pam was abducted from his home and murdered in a bush.

    Most of the individuals that were killed that morning were subjected to a degree of humiliation, shame and torture that was so horrendous that I am constrained to decline from sharing them in this contribution.

    The mutineers came to our home as well which at that time was the official residence of the Deputy Premier of the Old Western Region and which remains there till today.

    After storming our house and almost killing my brother, sister and me, they beat, brutalised and abducted my father Chief Remi Fani-Kayode.

    What I witnessed that morning was traumatic and devastating and, of course, what the entire nation witnessed was horrific.

    It was a morning of carnage, barbarity and terror.

    Those events set in motion a cycle of carnage which changed our entire history and the consequences remain with us till this day.

    It was a sad and terrible morning and one of blood and slaughter.

    My recollection of the events in our home is as follows.

    At around 2.00 a.m. my mother, Chief (Mrs.) Adia Aduni Fani-Kayode, came into the bedroom which I shared with my older brother, Rotimi and my younger sister Toyin. I was six years old at the time.

    My other older brother, Akinola, whom we fondly reffered to as Akins, was not with us that night because he was a border at Kings College, Lagos whilst my other younger sister Tolulope Fani-Kayode was not born until one year later!

    The lights had been cut off by the mutineers so we were in complete darkness and all we could see and hear were the headlights from three or four large and heavy trucks with big loud engines.

    The official residence of the Deputy Premier had a very long drive so it took the vehicles a while to reach us.

    We saw four sets of headlights and heard the engines of four lorries drive up the drive-way.

    The occupants of the lorries, who were uniformed men who carried torches, positioned themselves and prepared to storm our home whilst calling my fathers name and ordering him to come out.

    My father courageously went out to meet them after he had called us together, prayed for us and explained to us that since it was him they wanted he must go out there.

    He explained that he would rather go out to meet them and, if necessary, meet his death than let them come into the house to shoot or harm us all.

    The minute he stepped out they brutalised him. I witnessed this. They beat him, tied him up and threw him into one of the lorries.

    The first thing they said to him as he stepped out was “where are your thugs now Fani-Power?”

    My father’s response was typical of him, sharp and to the point. He said, “I don’t have thugs, only gentlemen.”

    I think this annoyed them and made them brutalise him even more. They tied him up, threw him in the back of the lorry and then stormed the house.

    When they got into the house they ransacked every nook and cranny, shooting into the ceiling and wardrobes.

    They were very brutal and frightful and we were terrified.

    My mother was screaming and crying from the balcony because all she could do was focus on her husband who was in the back of the truck downstairs. There is little doubt that she loved him more than life itself.

    “Don’t kill him, don’t kill him!!” she kept screaming at them. I can still visualise this and hear her voice pleading, screaming and crying.

    I didn’t know where my brother or sister were at this point because the house was in total chaos.

    (CONTINUED B

  • BREAKING: Coup In Benin Republic As Soldiers Announce Removal Of President Talon On National TV

     

    A  group of soldiers in the Benin Republic on Sunday announced that they had removed President Patrice Talon from office.

    The soldiers, who identified themselves as members of the “Military Committee for Refoundation (CMR),” made the announcement on state television.

    They declared that they had met and resolved that “Mr Patrice Talon is removed from office as president of the republic.”

    The announcement followed reports of heavy gunfire near Camp Guezo, close to the president’s official residence in Cotonou.

    The French Embassy confirmed the security situation on X, saying shots had been heard in the area and advising French nationals to remain indoors.

     

    ADVERTISEMENT
    Discover more
    Sports
    Shazam
    Newspaper
    Fare
    Activewear
    sport
    Sport
    Daily
    ADVERTISEMENT
    BREAKING: Coup In Benin Republic As Soldiers Announce Removal Of President Talon On National TV
    by Tgmedia December 7, 2025

    BREAKING: Coup In Benin Republic As Soldiers Announce Removal Of President Talon On National TV

    Discover more
    Activewear
    Daily
    Sports
    Shazam
    Newspaper
    Sport
    sport
    Fare
    ADVERTISEMENT
    7
    Shares

    Discover more
    Newspaper
    Sport
    Fare
    sport
    Sports
    Shazam
    Daily
    Activewear
    BREAKING: Coup In Benin Republic As Soldiers Announce Removal Of President Talon On National TV

     

     

    The Genius Media Nigeria reports that a group of soldiers in the Benin Republic on Sunday announced that they had removed President Patrice Talon from office.

    Discover more
    Sport
    Fare
    sport
    Activewear
    Newspaper
    Shazam
    Sports
    Daily
    The soldiers, who identified themselves as members of the “Military Committee for Refoundation (CMR),” made the announcement on state television.

    They declared that they had met and resolved that “Mr Patrice Talon is removed from office as president of the republic.”

    The announcement followed reports of heavy gunfire near Camp Guezo, close to the president’s official residence in Cotonou.

    The French Embassy confirmed the security situation on X, saying shots had been heard in the area and advising French nationals to remain indoors.

    Discover more
    Fare
    Sport
    Newspaper
    Shazam
    Activewear
    Daily
    sport
    Sports
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    Reports from Beninese media indicate that the president’s residence in the Le Guézo neighbourhood was attacked by a group of military personnel led by Lieutenant Colonel Pascal Tigri.

    Later in the morning, Tigri reportedly appeared on national television, said to be under military control, where he declared himself chairman of a “military re-establishment committee.”

    As of the time of this report, President Talon’s whereabouts remain unknown, and no official statement has been issued by the government.

    The situation in the capital is described as extremely volatile, with reports of troop movements at key strategic locations across Cotonou. Local media outlets have promised continuous updates as events unfold.

    President Talon, who has been in power since 2016, was expected to step down in April 2026 after completing two terms in office.

    The latest incident extends military takeovers across West Africa in recent years, including Guinea-Bissau, Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso

  • Coup Rumour Envelopes Abidjan, Ivory Coast

    Coup Rumour Envelopes Abidjan, Ivory Coast

    There are rumours and reports of a possible coup or large-scale uprising in Ivory Coast, particularly in Abidjan, where gunfire has been heard.

    According to Opera News, Reports emerging from the ground and social media suggest a volatile and fast-unfolding crisis.

    According to reports, at least 33 people have been killed over the past 48 hours as clashes intensified in key areas of the capital, Abidjan.

    (Abidjan)

    The unrest follows widespread dissatisfaction with President Alassane Ouattara’s administration, accused of severe human rights abuses, increasing poverty and maintaining deep ties with France.

    Protesters accuse the Ouattara-led government of being a puppet of foreign powers, particularly France and the U.S. with growing criticism aimed at the recent expansion of AFRICOM presence in the region.

    However, official confirmation remains unclear, as internet access has reportedly been cut off, and government visibility is fading.

    Some sources claim that President Ouattara may be missing, arrested, or possibly deceased, but there has been no official statement from the government.

    Meanwhile, fact-checkers have flagged some viral videos as misleading, stating that there is no verified evidence of a military takeover.

    Given the uncertainty, international organisations and embassies are on high alert, urging citizens to shelter in place.

    This is not the Ivory Coast’s first encounter with instability. The nation has previously endured a 1999 coup, civil wars from 2002-2007 and 2010-2011, and a military mutiny in 2017.

    Source