Tag: Court

  • NAFDAC HELD MEETING WITH STAKEHOLDERS AND PARTNERS ON REDUCTION OF SODIUM IN PRE-PACKAGED FOODS REGULATIONS 2026

    NAFDAC HELD MEETING WITH STAKEHOLDERS AND PARTNERS ON REDUCTION OF SODIUM IN PRE-PACKAGED FOODS REGULATIONS 2026

     

    By Sayo Akintola

    The Director General of the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control NAFDAC, Prof Mojisola Adeyeye has cautioned Nigerians against excessive sodium intake to avoid diet-related non-communicable diseases such as hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and stroke which she said are on the rise globally and within Nigeria.

    Prof Adeyeye gave the admonition at a stakeholders’ engagement on the draft NAFDAC Reduction of Sodium in Pre-Packaged Foods Regulations 2026 where she noted that excessive sodium intake has been identified as one of the leading dietary risk factors contributing to these conditions.

    According to her, the World Health Organisation has continued to emphasize sodium reduction as one of the cost-effective strategies for improving population heath and preventing premature deaths from non-communicable diseases.

    In Nigeria, Prof Adeyeye said, changing dietary patterns, rapid urbanisation, and increased consumption of processed and pre-packaged foods have significantly contributed to higher sodium intake among our population.

    She added that recognising this emerging public health concern, the Federal Government – through the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare and NAFDAC – has taken proactive steps to address this challenge.

    She maintained that the Reduction of Sodium in Pe-Packaged Foods Regulations 2026 is a key component of broader strategies to promote healthier diets and prevent non-communicable diseases, adding that these regulations aim to establish maximum sodium limits in selected categories of processed and pre-packaged foods, ensure clear and transparent labelling of sodium content, and encourage product reformulation by food manufacturers so that consumers can make healthier dietary choices.

    The NAFDAC boss, however, pointed out that, regulations alone cannot achieve the desired impact without the active participation of all stakeholders, stressing that the food industry especially plays a central role in reformulating products to reduce sodium content while maintaining safety, quality, and consumer acceptability.

    At the same time, she emphasized that regulators, researchers, public health advocates, and consumer organisations must work collaboratively to ensure implementation, monitoring and compliance.

    Cardiovascular Unit, University of Abuja that was present at the Meeting has worked closely with the FMOH&SW and NAFDAC on sodium reduction is in support of the regulations.

    Partners such as Network for Health Equity and Development NHED resolve to Save Lives and Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa CAPPA who were present and supported the stakeholders’ engagement underscored the importance of reducing sodium intake as a means of preventing non-communicable diseases.

    She added that the stakeholder engagement therefore provides an invaluable platform to:Present and clarify the key provisions of the proposed regulations.Obtain constructive feedback from industry and other stakeholders.Identify practical strategies for implementation. Strengthen collaboration in advancing healthier food environments in Nigeria.

    At NAFDAC, DG explained, ‘we recognise that regulatory reforms must be evidence-based, transparent, and inclusive. Our goal is not to disrupt industry operations, but to work with all partners to create a food system that supports both public health and sustainable economy.

    ’Prof Adeyeye stated that the reduction of sodium in our food supply is not merely a regulatory obligation – it is a national health priority, adding that ‘by taking decisive action today, we are protecting future generations from preventable diseases and improving the overall wellbeing of Nigerians.’

    The Director, Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (FSAN), Mrs Eva Edwards, corroborated the DG’s position as she stated that non-communicable diseases (NCDs) remain a major public health concern in Nigeria, with cardiovascular diseases accounting for a significant proportion of morbidity and mortality.

    For adults, she disclosed that the World Health Organization recommends a daily sodium intake of less than 2 grams, equivalent to 5 grams of salt (< 1 teaspoon of salt daily).

    She however, revealed that available data indicate that the average salt consumption in Nigeria is approximately 10 grams per day, about twice the WHO daily recommendation, adding that this excessive intake poses a serious risk to public health, particularly in the context of the increasing consumption of processed and ultra-processed foods, which are major contributors to dietary sodium intake.

    ‘Pre-packaged foods constitute a substantial and growing proportion of daily dietary intake, especially in urban settings. While these foods provide convenience and accessibility, they also contribute significantly to excessive sodium consumption, driving the scourge of cardiovascular diseases,’ adding that It is therefore imperative that deliberate and evidence-based measures are implemented to reduce sodium levels in these products.

    While sodium is essential for normal physiological functions such as nerve transmission, fluid balance, and muscle function, she warned that the quantity required by the body is minimal, noting that current consumption levels far exceed physiological needs, thereby increasing the risk of hypertension, stroke, heart disease, and kidney-related conditions.

    She disclosed that evidence from the National Multi-sectoral Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases (2019–2025) indicates that mean sodium intake in Nigeria ranges from approximately 2.85 g/day to 10 g/day – highlighting the urgent need for targeted regulatory and public health interventions.

    ‘The National Multi-sectoral Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases further identifies unhealthy diets as a major risk factor for non-communicable diseases and notes the ongoing dietary transition towards increased consumption of processed foods high in sodium, sugar, and trans fats.’In recognition of this growing public health challenge, and as part of efforts to reduce sodium intake, Mrs Edwards stated that the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (FMoH&SW) initiated the development of the National Guidelines for Sodium Reduction, which provides specific sodium benchmarks for various food categories.

    She said this is aimed at promoting the reformulation of processed foods and encouraging the production of healthier options aligned with national health goals.She emphasised that the draft NAFDAC Reduction of Sodium in Pre-Packaged Foods Regulations therefore incorporates a phased sodium reduction strategy, beginning with an initial 15% reduction target and progressing toward the national target which is aligned with the WHO global target of achieving a 30% reduction in population sodium intake by 2030. According to Mrs Edwards, the Sodium Reduction Regulations represent a strategic regulatory response to meet the national target and address the public health concern of high sodium intake, stressing that the objective is to guide the food industry towards gradual product reformulation and the promotion of healthier food environments, without compromising product quality or consumer acceptance, ultimately to protect the health of consumers.

    Noting that government alone cannot achieve this, Mrs Edwards stated that it requires the collective effort of policymakers, regulators, the food industry, public health advocates, academia, and consumers.The Director General rounded up the meeting by emphasizing the importance of the stakeholders meeting stating that inputs received are used to further edit the draft regulations before the document goes to the NAFDAC Governing Council for further assessment.

    Thereafter, the regulations are given additional review by FMoH&SW and Ministry of Justice before gazetting. Meanwhile, the food industry is made aware of the development of the regulations and the expectations in the planned phased reduction of sodium content in processed foods as means of prevention of non-communicable diseases such as hypertension and other heart diseases in the population.

     

    (SAYO AKINTOLA is NAFDAC Resident Media Consultant)

  • Court jailed man 10-years for facilitating N750, 000 cash swap to Boko Haram

    Court jailed man 10-years for facilitating N750, 000 cash swap to Boko Haram

     

    The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Tuesday, convicted and sentenced Awal Bello to a 10-year imprisonment for facilitating the exchange of the sum of N750, 000 notes to Boko Haram during currency swap in 2023.

    Justice Binta Nyako, in a judgment, also sentenced Bello to a 10-year jail term for paying a tax of N20, 000 to Boko Haram contary to Section 21 of the Terrorism Prevention Act, 2013.

    Justice Nyako, who found the defendant guilty of the offence after he pleaded guilty to the two-count charge preferred against him by the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), ordered that the sentencing shall run concunrently.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the Federal Government in the charge, marked: FHC/KNJ/CR/563/2026, had sued Awal Bello as sole defendant.

    In count one, Bello of Mantari Village in the Bama Local Government Area of Borno was alleged to have in 2023, rendered support by facilitating Nigerian currency notes of N750, 000 to Boko Haram contrary to Section 13 of the Terrorism Prevention Act, 2013, and punishable under the same act.

    In count two, he was accused to have paid a N20, 000 tax to the terrorist organisation contrary to Section 21 of Terrorism Prevention Act, 2013.

    Bello, who pleaded guilty to the charge, begged the court to temper justice with mercy.

    Justice Nyako, who sentenced him to a 10 year imprisonment in each of the counts, ordered that Bello be rehabilitated and deradicalised.

    In another case involving Hamat Modu, who pleaded guilty to being a member of Boko Haram group, Justice Nyako sentenced him to 10 years jail term in each of the four counts bordering on terrorism offences, following his guilty plea.

    The judge, who directed that the counts must run concurrently, also ordered that Modu should undergo rehabilitation and deradicalisation.

    Also, Isah Ali, who was 18-year-old at the time of his arrest, pleaded not guilty to count one but pleaded guilty to count two of the two-count charge.

    B. M. Jibo, lawyer to the Federal Government, applied that the court should strike out count one and accordingly convict Ali in count two.

    She urged the court to also admit his confessional statement and investigation report as exhibits.

    Ali, while pleading for mercy, said he was young when he was drafted into the terror group.

    The defence lawyer, Aliyu Abubakar, the Director General, Legal Aid Council, also pleaded for mercy.

    “The defendant was 18 years when he was arrested and had been in detention since three years now.

    “It is another case of terrorism by association. We pleaded that the court should take this into consideration in sentencing him,” he begged.

    Justice Nyako, who struck out count one, sentenced the defendant to 10 years imprisonment in count two and ordered for his rehabilitation and deradicalisation.

    The judge, in another case, sentenced Shehu Bukar to 20 years imprisonment in count three in which he pleaded guilty out of the five counts preferred against him.

    Count three accused him of rendering support as livestock rustler by selling goats to Boko Haram group contrary to Section 5 of Terrorism Prevention Act, 2013.

    Bukar, however, pleaded not guilty to other counts, including count two where he was alleged to have participated in a terrorist attack at Konduga in Borno where scores of people were killed.

    A 43-year-old Alhaji Kulle was sentenced to a five-year jail term in count one and three of the three-count terrorism charge which must run concurrently.

    The prosecution had, in the count three, accused Kulle of paying the sum of N6000 to Boko Haram weekly, knowing that the money would be used to finance terrorism activities.

    Justice Nyako equally jailed Tasiu Yakubu seven years in a one-count charge preferred against him by the Federal Government.

    The AGF and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, who led other lawyers including Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, the Director of Public Prosecutions, in the trial, tendered Yakubu’s confessional statement and investigation report as evidence before the court, urging the court to convict Yakubu in accordance with the law.

    Abubakar, DG of Legal Aid, did not object but prayed the court to temper justice with mercy since the defendant had been remorseful.

    But Fagbemi argued that based on Section 5 of the Terrorism Prevention Act, Yakubu ought to be given 20 years imprisonment though his sentencing might run from his date of arrest.

    According to him, sentencing guidelines must follow what the law says.

    After listening to the parties, Justice Nyako sentenced Yakubu to seven years jail term from the date of his arrest and ordered for his rehabilitation and deradicalisation.

    In another development, Justice Nyako sentenced Abdullahii Ali to a 20-year imprisonment in a one-count charge filed against him.

    Ali, who was alleged to have rendered support to the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) by assisting through logistic supply of fuel to the terror group, admitted committing the offence.

    The offence is said to be contrary to Section 13 and 13(b) of the Terrorism Prevention Act, 2013.

    Fagbemi urged the court to sentence him in accordance with the law.

    The judge, in his judgment, sentenced Ali to 20-year jail term beginning from Nov. 20, 2023, which was the date of his arrest.

  • FG prosecuting 500 suspected terrorists in Phase 9 of mass trial

    FG prosecuting 500 suspected terrorists in Phase 9 of mass trial

     

    The Federal Government has moved forward with the prosecution of 500 suspected terrorists as part of an intensified effort to tackle insecurity

    Mr Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, said this on Tuesday while speaking to newsmen shortly after he led a team of the Federal Government’s lawyers to the Federal High Court (FHC) in Abuja where he appeared as prosecution counsel.

    The minister said the 500 defendants are being prosecuted in the ongoing Phase 9 of the mass trial of suspected terrorists in Abuja.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) ealier reported that the mass trial of the suspected terrorists was moved to Abuja from the usual location in Kainji, Niger State.

    Speaking, the AGF said the trial, which began on Tuesday, would be concluded between Friday or Saturday.

    “For today, we have 227 suspects brought to court on this terrorism charges and they are appearing before 10 judges of the Federal High Court.

    ” Don’t forget, this is Easter period. Ordinarily, the judges are not supposed to be here; they are supposed to be in their various homes to observe the Easter vacation.

    “But they have been so patriotic and they have prioritised the trial of terrorism suspects to underscore the importance that is attached to this trial. So we thank them.

    “This is Phase 9, don’t forget. For Phase 9, we have 500 in all and it will last till either Friday or Saturday.

    “It is hoped that from these 500, we will be able to go very very far.

    “So we thank all the critical stakeholders, including of course you, members of the fourth estate of the realm, for considering the service to the nation first and foregoing your Easter period,” he said.

    On why the trial was moved from Kainji to Abuja, the minister said it was due to logistic purpose.

    “Whether the cases are tried in Kainji or Maiduguri, those to try terrorism suspects are judges of the Federal High Court.

    “For logistic purpose, it is not convenient to go to Kainji, , although the same judges would have been ferried to Kainji.

    “But it is more convenient here; we have more courtrooms here and the facilities, and for 10 judges at a time, you know what it means. It means a lot.

    “That’s why we brought these ones here. We have an enablement in terms of law to sit here and that is why we are sitting here,” he said.

    Fagbemi said Amnesty International, tur media, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), members of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), members of the human rights community, etc, are in attendance to show that the proceedings are undergoing due process.

    According to the minister, nobody will be convicted unless he has satisfied the provisions of thr law.

    “And that is why we are here. It is in the open; it is not a secret trial.

    “You will see where confessions are made, where proof is given. Evertrhing I’d in the public glear and you can see things for yourself.

    “What has taken the Director General of the Legal Aid Council to also forgo his holiday this period is also appreciated.

    “We have the full complement of the Federal Ministry of Justice, especially the Public Prosecution Department ably led by the Director of Public Prosecutions Department of the Federation, Rotimi Oyedepo,” he said.

    Also speaking, the DG, Legal Aid Council, who led the defence team, expressed satisfaction with the trial.

    He said the terrorism trial was made a little easy because majority of the suspects admit to committing the crime.

    “This has been our experience over the years and today’s trial is not different. Majority of them admit to committing the crime.

    “A large number of them are also been convicted for association with Boko Haram.

    “Some of them are not active participants in the Boko Haram or ISWAP activities as the case may be.

    “But they are being convicted as you are all aware under the law, becauuse association is as grievous as committing an offence.

    “Happily, I can say one or two suspects have been discharged and acquitted.

    “You can imagine for somebody who have been in detention for four, five years under the military custody to be discharged and acquitted, showed that the trial has some levels of transparency,” he said.

    Abubakar also said that as defrnce lawyers, , they were given the facility to interact with the suspects before being brought to court.

    According to him, it is a pre-requisite of the law.

    He said pre-trial interviews were conducted for the defendants in Maiduguri and Kainji and his team was able to interact with those who were newly brought in on Monday before today’s trial.

  • APC convention dispute: Court orders substituted service of processes on Yilwatda, others

    APC convention dispute: Court orders substituted service of processes on Yilwatda, others

     

    The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, ordered a substituted service of court documents on Prof. Nentawe Yilwatda, APC National Chairman, and others in a suit filed by an aggrieved aspirant, Fubara Dagogo, challenging his exclusion from the party’s national convention election.

    (From Left: Barrister Ogochukwu Onyema and aggrieved APC aspirant in the last national convention, Amb. Fubara Dagogo, on Monday to the Federal High Court in Abuja)

     

    Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, who gave the order, adjourned the matter until April 24 for the hearing of all pending applications, including the preliminary objection filed by the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Dagogo had, in the suit, prayed the court to nullify the outcome of any party’s national congress for the position of National Vice Chairman, South South, without his physical participation.

    He urged the judge to determine whether there could be a legitimate zonal congress for South South APC with his alleged unlawful exclusion after he was duly cleared and paid for his expression of interest (EoI) and nomination forms.

    The plaintiff, through his lawyer, Chief Ogochukwu Onyema, named APC and Prof. Yilwatda as 1st amd 2nd defendants.

    Dagogo also listed Hon Victor Giadom, party’s National Vice Chairman, South South, and Sulaiman Muitamma, APC’s National Organising Secretary, as 3rd and 4th defendants respectively.

    In the originating summons, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/591/2026 dated March 22 and filed March 23 by his lawyer, Dagogo sought six reliefs.

    He wants the court to declare that by virtue of APC’s Payment Acknowledgment Receipt No. 26827 dated March 13 and issued to him, he is entitled to be issued with the requisite EoI and Nomination Forms as an aspirant for the position of National Vice Chairman, South —South Nigeria.

    He is equally praying the court to award a general damages of N100 million against the 3rd and 4th defendants for the discomfitures, embarrassments and mental torture, they occasioned to him with their ill conduct.

    But the APC, in a preliminary objection filed by its lawyer, Kayode Okunade, urged the court to strike out or dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction.

    Okunade also prayed the court for an order striking out the originating summons filed by Dagogo as incompetent.

    The lawyer, in his eight-ground argument, said the subject matter of the suit borders on the internal affairs of a political party, which is non-justiciable and outside the jurisdiction of the court.

    He said Dagogo’s complaint, relating to non-issuance of nomination form despite payment, concerns the conduct of party congresses and pre-primary processes, which are within the exclusive domestic jurisdiction of the party.

    Okunade argued that the applicant lacks the locus standi to institute the action, having not been duly recognised as a valid aspirant under the APC Constitution and Guidelines.

    He said the suit is premature, the applicant having failed to exhaust the internal dispute resolution mechanisms provided under the party’s constitution.

    The lawyer, who said the suit constitutes an abuse of court process, aimed at inviting the court to interfere in the discretionary powers of a political party, argued that Dagogo had not disclosed any reasonable cause of action against the respondents.

    When the matter was called on Monday, Onyema informed the court of their inability to serve 2nd to 4th defendants which necessitated the motion ex-parte for substituted service.

    After moving the motion, Justice Abdulmalik granted the reliefs for substituted service of all processes, including the originating summons, on Yilwatda, Giadom and Muitamma.

    The judge also ordered that hearing notices be issued and served on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants respectively to ensure all parties are before the court on the next adjourned date.

  • Cleric asks judge to vacate order of final forfeiture on N70m Abuja house

    Cleric asks judge to vacate order of final forfeiture on N70m Abuja house

     

    A cleric, Mr Nuhu Muhammed, has prayed Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja to set aside the order of final forfeiture made, forfeiting an Abuja property worth N70 million to the Federal Government.

    Muhammed, in a motion on notice filed by his counsel, Mike Enahoro-Ebah, told Justice Omotosho that he is the bonafide owner of the property.

    Muhammed, who said he is an Islamic scholar and a realtor based in Okene, Kogi, alleged that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) got the order by misrepresentation and suppression of germane facts.

    Justice Omotosho had, on Feb. 18, made an order for final forfeiture of the property located at No. 12, 5th Avenue, 59 Crescent, Gwarimpa in Abuja.

    The judge gave the order following a motion on notice, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/2431/2025, for final forfeiture moved by Emenike Mgbemele, counsel to the EFCC.

    Mgbemele had told the court that the commission had complied with the earlier court order to publish the interim forfeiture order in a national daily for interested person(s) to show cause why the final order should not be made with respect to the property.

    He said the property, comprising one unit of 4 bedroom detached bungalow with pent house and two-room boys quarters, was reasonably suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activities.

    In the motion dated Feb. 9 but filed Feb. 10 by Ekele Iheanacho, SAN, the lawyer gave six grounds why the motion should be granted.

    Also, an EFCC’s investigator, Alozie Andrew, in the affidavit he deposed to, said a petition was received from the Anti-Corruption Network regarding the property.

    He said on receipt of the petition, it was assigned to his team for discreet investigation.

    The investigator said the N70 million used in the purchase of the property was traced to the Kogi State internally Generated Revenue Service (KGIRS).

    He said that Sen. Oseni Yakubu, while serving as the Chairman of KGIRS approved payments to Bespoque Business Solutions Ltd to which he was the sole signatory.

    Andrew alleged that Yakubu directed that the sum of N70 million he received as kickback from the consultant, be applied to purchase the said property.

    The officer averred that the funds, received as a kickback by Yakubu, was paid to EFAB Properties Ltd in two tranches of N25 million and N45 million.

    However, Muhammed, in the application dated and filed on Feb. 24 by Enahoro-Ebah, disagreed with the averments.

    The Islamic scholar sought two reliefs.

    These include an order vacating or setting aside the order of final forfeiture made on Feb. 18, forfeiting the property to the Federal Government, “on the grounds of fundamental breach of his right to fair hearing, procedural irregularity, concealment of truth and misrepresentation of facts.”

    He also sought an order directing the EFCC to release forthwith to him all the documents seized from him in respect of the property.

    Giving 22 grounds why his application should be granted, his lawyer submitted that Muhammed is the bonifade owner of the property and had been in quiet and peaceable legal possession of same since August 2017.

    He said on Jan. 13, the court granted an ex-parte interim order of forfeiture in respect of the said property upon the commission’s application.

    Enahoro-Ebah stated that the said order was published on Jan. 23 edition of Business Day Newspaper, inviting any interested party to show cause within the stipulated period of 14 days why a final forfeiture order should not be made.

    According to him, the publication was made in a Business Day Newspaper which is a business newspaper meant primarily for those in the business community and those interested in business rather than national dailies such as Daily Trust and Vanguard Newspapers.

    The lawyer argued that Muhammed primarily resides in Okene, Kogi, where Business Day Newspaper does not ordinarily circulate.

    He said his client only became aware of the interim order of forfeiture when his attention was drawn to the motion for final forfeiture on Feb. 12, after the expiration of the 14-day period stipulated therein and a day after the saidotion for final forfeiture was taken.

    He said the EFCC had invited Muhammed with respect to the property in the past and thus had his contact information but deliberately failed to serve him the interim order of the court or the motion on notice filed Feb. 10.

    Besides, the lawyer said the commission was aware that Muhammed had a tenant in the property and that any notice pasted on the premises or served on the tenant would be promptly brought to his attention.

    Enahoro-Ebah said Muhammed, upon becoming aware of the proceedings, promptly instructed him to approach the court with all requisite applications, including a motion for extension of time within which to show cause and leave to file an affidavit to show cause.

    He said this was so because additional time was required to collate documentary evidence substantiating the legitimate ownership of the property by the interested party/applicant.

    He said on Feb. 6, relevant court papers were filed, served on the EFCC, transmitted to the registry of the court and were duly received and acknowledged on the same date.

    Enahoro-Ebah said on Feb. 18 when the matter came up for ruling on the commission’s application for final order of forfeiture, he drew the court’s attention to their filed documents.

    He, however, said that due to administrative lapses, Muhammed’s processes could not be found in the court’s file.

    “Consequently, the court proceeded to deliver its ruling granting the order of final forfeiture,” he said.

    The lawyer argued that the instant application is premised on the fundamental breach of the applicant’s constitutionally guaranteed right to fair hearing under Section 36(1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

    He argued that the final forfeiture order was obtained “in violation of the principles of natural justice, particularly the audi alteram partem rule, and contrary to the procedural safeguards enshrined in Section 17(4) and (5) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Related Offences Act, 2006.”

    He submitted that the anti-graft agency concealed facts in obtaining the order.

    He urged the court to grant the application in the interest of justice so as to prevent irreparable harm and miscarriage of justice.

    Muhammed, in the affidavit he deposed to, said Sen. Yakubu was appointed as the chairman of Kogi Internally Generated Revenue Service (KGIRS) as a result of his sincere, earnest and effectual fervent prayers.

    The cleric said the appointment was also as a result of separate acts of devotion, costly offerings, sacrifices and obligatory vow fulfilment, all to Yakubu’s acknowledgement and approval.

    He said in fulfilling his vow, Yakubu offered to pay him in 2017 for his services and asked how the payment should be effected.

    According to him, I opted not to be paid in cash as I feared I would utilise the money for other clients and to solve other problems without having anything to show for it.

    “Hence, I informed him of my desire to acquire a landed property in Abuja-FCT particularly from Efab Properties Ltd at their Gwarinpa Estate,” he said.

    The Islamic scholar said Yakubu paid for the property and was given to him as a “gift to offset all his outstanding indebtedness to me at that material time.”

    Muhammed, who said he had been in quiet and peaceable legal possession of the property since August 2017, prayed the court to grant his application.

    But Andrew, in a counter affidavit he deposed to, prayed the court to dismiss Muhammad’s application.

    The investigator insisted that contrary to the cleric’s averment, it was Sen. Yakubu who directed the consultant to pay the sum of N70 million to Efab Properties Ltd for the purchase of the subject property using Nuhu Muhammed’s name.

    According to him, Exhibit EFCC 5 which is the statement of Senator Yakubu confirms that the senator paid for the property with proceeds of unlawful activity under the instructions of the former Governor, Yahaya Bello.

    Justice Omotosho adjourned the matter until April 15 for hearing.

  • Court orders final forfeiture of N400m linked to AVM Abdulraheem

    Court orders final forfeiture of N400m linked to AVM Abdulraheem

     

     

    The Federal High Court in Abuja has made an order for final forfeiture of the sum of N400 million allegedly linked to AVM Mikail Abdulraheem to the Federal Government.

    Justice Emeka Nwite, who granted the order after counsel for the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Abba Muhammed, SAN, moved the motion to the effect, held that the application was meritorious.

    Although the ruling was delivered on March 17, the enrolled order was sighted on Thursday by the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Abuja.

    Justice Nwite said: “It is hereby ordered as follows:

    “That the applicant has satisfied the condition for grant of order sought and accordingly the application is hereby granted as prayed.

    “That an order of final forfeiture is hereby made by this honourable court forfeiting to the Federal Government of Nigeria, the sum of four hundred million naira (N400,000,000.00) paid at the instance of Air Vice Marshall Abdulraheem Mikail Babatunde to Cosgrove Investment Limited which is reasonably suspected to be the proceeds of unlawful activities.

    “Issued at Abuja under the Seal of the Court and the Hand of the Presiding Judge, this 17th day of March, 2026.”

    NAN reports that the EFCC had, in the motion on notice marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/2710/2025, sought a relief.

    The commission sought “a final order of this honourable court forfeiting to the Federal Government of Nigeria, the sum of Four Hundred Mullion Naira (N400,000,000.00) paid at the instance of Air Vice Marshall Abdulraheem Mikail Babatunde to Cosgrove Investment Limited which is reasonably suspected to be the proceeds of unlawful activities.”

    The motion, dated Feb. 2, was filed Feb. 3 by Muhammed.

    The lawyer, in the application, sought five grounds why the application should be granted.

    According to him, this honourable court has the statutory powers under the provision of Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud RelaTed Offences Act, 2006, to grant the prayers sought.

    “The funds sought to be forfeited is reasonably suspected to be proceed of unlawful activities,” he said.

    Muhammed stated that on Dec. 31, 2025, the court made an interim order forfeiting the funds to the Federal Government.

    He said the order of the court was published on page 25 of Vanguard Newspaper of Jan. 8.

    The lawyer, however, said that no reasonable cause had been shown why the funds, which formed subject of the order of interim forfeiture, should not be finally forfeited to the Federal Government of Nigeria.

    In the affidavit in support of the motion deposed to by Abubakar Kwaido, an investigating Officer with the Economic Governance Sectiom of the EFCC, he said he was one of the investigators in the case.

    He said the commission “received an Intelligence on the purchase of several luxurious and high end properties by several public officials and private individuals using unlicensed bureau de change (BDC) operators in a bid to launder suspected proceeds of unlawful activities.”

    According to him, upon receipt of the Intelligence, it was assigned to my team for discreet investigation.

    The officer said in the course of the investigation, a property described as House No. CC13 Chatteaux Estate Wuse II, a gated six-bedroom luxurious contemporary mansion, worth N400 million to be built by Cosgrove Investment Limited and Aeronautical Engineering & Technical Services Limited (AETSL) featured.

    “That Aeronautical Engineering & Technical Services Limited (AETSL) is a company established to develop the capability to conduct in—country Periodic Depot Maintenance (PDM) of Nigerian Air Force aircrafts and associated equipment amongst others and the members of the Board of Directors of the AETSL are drawn from within the Nigerian Air Force.

    “That Air Vice Marshal (AVM) Abdulraheem Mikail Babatunde served in AETSL between 2012 and 2014,” Kwaido said.

    He said AETSL transferred the total sum of N122 million in two tranches of N100 million on Dec. 23, 2013 and N22 million on Jan. 21, 2014, to AVM Abdulraheem’s company – Mofaza-Mafoz Nigeria Limited with account number 0483004284 domiciled in Eco Bank.

    “The statement of account of Mofaza-Mafoz Nigeria Limited stated above showing the inflows is hereby annexed and marked as Exhibit EFCC 1,” he said.

    The investigtor alleged that Abdulraheem is the Managing Director of Mafoza-Mafoz Nigeria Limited and Mafoza Technologies Nigeria Limited.

  • Alleged Yelwata massacre: Trial of 9 stalls as defendant slumps in court

    Alleged Yelwata massacre: Trial of 9 stalls as defendant slumps in court

     

    The trial of nine suspected terrorists linked to the June 2025 Yelwata killings was, on Tuesday, stalled after one of the defendants became unconcious in court.

    Alhaji Haruna Abdullahi, the 3rd defendant, slumped from his seat and fell to the floor, prior to the commencement of the case before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court in Abuja.

    The prison officials who brought them to court tried to revive him and later helped him back on his chair, but he remained unresponsive.

    Upon resumed hearing, counsel to the prosecution, Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, told the court that, the matter was slated for trial-within-trial.

    Oyedepo, however, said that he was informed by officials of the Nigerian Correctional Service that, the 3rd defendant, Abdullahi, who came to court by himself, developed serious health issues while in court.

    He said, the Federal Government is not persecuting the defendants but that, the defendants are being prosecuted over their alleged involvement in the killings in Yelwata Community in Guma Local Government Area of Benue.

    According to the lawyer, the defendant must be well to face his trial in court.

    Ahmed Mohammad, who appeared for Alhaji Abdullahi, told the judge that even though his client came to court by himself, his health condition got worse leading to his collapsed in court.

    He prayed the court for an adjournment to enable the defendant get medical attention at any hospital in Abuja.

    Counsel to the 1st defendant, Ibrahim Angulu, SAN, including Oyedepo did not object to the request for adjournment.

    Consequently, the judge adjourned the matter untill March 30 and 31 for continuation of trial.

    She also ordered that hearing notices should be served on the defendants.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the defendants who were arraigned on 57-count amended charge bordering on alleged terrorism offences, pleaded not guilty to all the counts.

    They were alleged to have carried out the terror attack on June 13, 2025, on Yelwata town where many houses were burnt down and about 150 people were massacred, while others sustained various degree of injuries.

    The suspects include Ardo Lawal Mohammed Dono, Ardo Muhammadu Saidu, Alhaji Haruna Abdullahi, Yakubu Adamu, Alhaji Musa Mohammed, Abubakar Adamu, Shaibu Ibrahim, Sale Mohammed and Bako Jibrin.

    In count one of the charge, marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/471/2025, the defendants and others still at large were alleged to have, sometime between May and June 2025 in Nasarawa State, knowingly and directly participated in meetings in connection with the commission of an act of terrorism.

    They were said to have planned the attack on Yelwata Community in Guma Local Government Area of Benue, and subsequently carried it out June 13, 2025, resulting in the burning of houses, grievous bodily harm, and the death of approximately 150 persons.

    The offence is said to be contrary to Section 12(a) of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022 and punishable under the same section.

    In count 25, Ardo Lawal Mohammed Dono (1st defendant) was alleged to have, between May and June 2025 in Nasarawa State, “instigated and instructed other Ardos and all Fulani youths in Nasarawa State, Kwara State, Taraba State, Giza, and other surrounding villages to carry out attack on Yelwata Community” on June 13, 2025, where at least 150 persons died.

    The offence is contrary to Section 26(2)(b) of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022 and punishable under the same Act, among other counts.

  • UPDATE: Court jails ex-AGoF, Nwabuoku 72 years for N868m fraud

    UPDATE: Court jails ex-AGoF, Nwabuoku 72 years for N868m fraud

     

    The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, convicted and sentenced Chukwunyere Nwabuoku, former acting Accountant-General of the Federation (AGoF), to a 72-year jail term without an option of fine.

    Justice James Omotosho, in a judgment, held that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), through its lawyer, Ekele Iheanacho, SAN, had been able to prove the nine-count money laundering charge beyond reasonable doubt.

    Jutsice Omotosho, who convicted Nwabuoku in all the nine counts, sentenced him to eight years imprisonment in each of the counts, making a total of 72 years.

    The judge, however, ordered that the counts shall run concurrently beginning from Monday, March 23.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Nwabuoku was admitted to a N500 million bail with two sureties in the like sum after he was arraigned on Jan. 15, 2025, on a nine-count amended charge.

    The EFCC listed Nwabuoku as the sole defendant in the charge marked FHC/ABJ/CR/240/2024, which bordered on money laundering to the tune of N868 million.

    In count one of the charge filed on Nov. 27, 2024, the EFCC alleged that Nwabuoku, alongside Temeeo Synergy Concept Limited (at large), Turge Global Investment Limited (at large), Laptev Bridge Limited, Arafura Transnational Afro Limited (at large), and other persons (all at large), conspired to convert funds.

    The funds were said to be proceeds of unlawful activities.

    The anti-graft agency said the offence was contrary to Section 18 of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act, 2011, as amended by Act No. 1 of 2012, and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.

    Nwabuoku was alleged to have perpetrated the act while serving as the director of Finance and Accounts in the Ministry of Defence between 2019 and 2021.

    He was later appointed acting AGoF on May 20, 2022, under ex-President Muhammadu Buhari after Ahmed Idris was suspended as AGoF over alleged N80 billion fraud.

    Nwabuoku, however, was removed in July 2022, a few weeks after assuming office.

    Sylva Okolieaboh, a director at the Treasury Single Account (TSA) Department, replaced Nwabuoku as acting AGoF.

    Okolieaboh’s appointment followed a report that Nwabuoku was under the EFCC’s radar over corruption allegations.

    Delivering the judgment on Monday, Justice Omotosho said that in determining the charge, the court had one issue for determination.

    “Whether the prosecution has established the charge against the defendant beyond reasonable doubt to secure his conviction?” he said.

    The judge earlier dismissed the argument of Nwabuoku’s lawyer, Norrison Quakers, SAN, on inadmissibility of his client’s three confessional statements.

    Quakers had argued that the defendant’s statements were not voluntarily made and did not comply with the law.

    But Justice Omotosho held that in challenging the admissibility of a confessional statement on the ground of involuntariness, the best time to raise the issue is at the stage of it being tendered in evidence by the prosecution, and not on appeal by way of counsel’s submissions.

    The judge, who cited a previous case delivered by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, said if the counsel had raised an objection to the admissibility of the statement on the ground that it was not voluntarily made, the court would have conducted a trial-within-trial to determine the issue.

    “At the point of tendering these statements, Exhibits PWT, PWV2 and Exhibit DWI were not objected to by defence counsel.

    “This failure to raise the objections is deemed to be an admission that the statements were made voluntarily and thus raising same at this stage amounts to an afterthought.

    “Consequently, this court is entitled to rely on the statements in the determination of this charge,” he ruled.

    On the substantive issue, the judge said that the standard of proof is usually beyond reasonable doubt because criminal cases are a very serious specie of proceedings as the freedom and in some cases the life of the defendant is on the line if found guilty.

    According to him, while the prosecution is not mandated to call a certain number of witnesses in proof of its case, it must call material witnesses to help it prove its case.

    “The prosecution is not absolved of the duty placed on it by the law to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt even where the defendant has pleaded guilty to the charge, ” he said.

    While reviewing the counts, the judge found that the anti-graft agency had been able to prove all the ingredients essential in each of the counts to convict the defendant.

    “The defendant as the Director of Finance at the Federal Ministry of Defence had monies entrusted to him.

    “Monies meant for the security and defence of the nation. Instead, the defendant converted the monies to his use.

    “The defendant expertly put the money through proxy into his portfolio account with Quantum Zenith Securities to buy and trade securities.

    “This is a classic example of what money laundering does. It is the putting of dirty money into legitimate business which helps to clean the money.

    “The idea behind proving a predicate offence comes from what money laundering itself means.

    “As a global phenomenon, money laundering means cleaning money from unlawful source to make it look clean and legal.

    “Money laundering is a global scourge that affects countries worldwide, Nigeria not being an exception.

    “It has been described as the washing of illegitimate money in a bid to make it appear clean or legitimate.

    “It involves the process of transforming the proceeds of crime into ostensibly legitimate money or other assets.

    “Hence, any action or transaction emanating from legally obtained money cannot ground a charge of money laundering, let alone result in conviction for the offence,” he said.

    Justice Omotosho observed that Nwabuoku, in Exhibit DW1, had earlier stated that the monies paid into the four corporate accounts were for secret operations.

    “However, the evidence before the court all show that they were rather used for the personal use of the defendant, ‘ he said.

    The judge also observed that prior to 2019, the balance in the defendant’s account from Exhibit PWG was less than N3 million but suddenly from August 2019, his portfolio grew and it began being credited with tens of millions of naira to purchase more securities.

    “The timing is quite curious as it coincides with the timeline of the alleged offences.

    “From the accounts of MDavi Limited (PWE), the sum of about N160 million was credited to the account of the defendant with Quantum Zenith Securities for the purchase of securities.

    “All these evidence clearly proves the guilt of the defendant.

    “Consequently, the defendant is convicted of count 9 of the charge,” he ruled.

    The judge further observed that the evidence of the 9th prosecution witness that Nwabuoku voluntarily refunded N220 million during investigation was not controverted by the defence.

    According to the judge, the defendant’s act of diverting funds meant for other purposes to his own use is quite appalling and revealing.

    “This is even more concerning as it involves a very critical ministry such as the Ministry of Defence.

    “These monies were probably meant to improve the security situation in the country. Unfortunately, they were siphoned into private pockets.

    “I must say the defendant was ingenious in trying to hide the source of these funds by using shell companies and using friends and associates.

    “However, the diligent investigation of the prosecution was able to link him to the said funds.

    “This court must commend the prosecution for being detailed in its investigation and for present a coherent and cogent case against the defendant.

    “The defendant on the other hand is condemned for greedily converting public funds to his own use.

    “In final analysis, the prosecution has successfully established the nine counts charge against the defendant beyond reasonable doubt.

    “The defendant is hereby convicted as charged,” he declared.

    Responding, lawyer who appeared for the prosecution, Ogechi Ujam, thanked the judge for the time and industry put in to deliver the judgment.

    She said the ptosecution had no previous criminal record of the convict.

    Justice Omotosho then asked the lawyer what the law says about the punishment of the offence.

    Ujam, who cited Section 15(3) of the Money Laundering Act, 2011, said it provided for not less than seven years or not more than 14 years jail term in each of the count.

    Isidore Udenko, who represented the former AGoF, pleaded for leniency.

    “My lord, the defendant is a first offender. He is a man that had served this country for 35 years at the highest level.

    “He has shown remorse and he has an aged mother as the only son.

    “In showing remorse, he has refunded part of the money to the prosecution and throughout the trial, he was diligent and did not offend the court,” Udenko begged.

    The judge said the Supreme Court had also decided that the defendant himself should be allowed to make allocution (plead for mercy) why the court should not give the maximum sentence.

    Responding, Nwabuoku also begged the court to temper justice with mercy.

    “My Lord, I have served for 35 years and retired. In all these years, I have been diligent.

    “It is not as if I converted any money but I have returned some from my shares.
    My lord, I will plead for leniency,” he said.

    Nwabuoku, however, pledged to refund the remaining part of the money.

    “But you said at a point that the refund was not coming from, ” the judge responded to the defendant’s plea to refund the remaining part of the money.

    “What I meant was that the refund was not voluntary; I was compelled,” he said.

    But his lawyer suddenly cut in and said: “My lord, what the defendant is saying is that he is remorseful and whatever remains, he is ready to refund.”

    “At this level, we have gone beyond issues of refund,” the judge said.

    The EFCC lawyer then urged the court to sentence the convict in accordance with the law and to order the forfeiture of the property.

    Justice Omotosho, after listening to the lawyers and the defendant, sentenced Nwabuoku to eight years imprisonment in each of the nine counts which shall bring cuncunrrently.

    “The sentence shall start to run from today the 23 Day of March, 2026 and shall run concurrently.

    “The prosecution is at liberty to file formal application for forfeiture of applicable assets and properties,” the judge ruled.

    The judge said the EFCC should filed the application for forfeiture of the affected property and that the defence would respond accordingly before a final order is made.

    “You can bring the post-conviction application so that the defence too can respond appropriately because he is entitled to fair hearing and we will ensure that,” he said.

    NAN reports that on Jan. 31, 2025, the 1st prosecution witness (PW-1), Eucharia Ezeodi, a Zenith Bank Plc staff member and PW-2, Felix Nweke, a director in the federal civil service, gave their testimonies against the defendant.

    The anti-graft agency, however, closed its case after calling nine witnesses to establish its case against Nwabuoku.

    Justice Omotosho had, on Nov. 13, 2025, dismissed Nwabuoku’s no-case submission, which he opted for after the prosecution closed its case.

    The judge, in a ruling, held that a prima facie case had been made out against Mr Nwabuoku by the EFCC to warrant him to enter his defence.

    Nwabuoku, who opened his defence on Feb. 2, prayed the court to acquit and discharge him of the alleged N868.46 million fraud case preferred against him by the anti-graft agency.

    Led in evidence by his lawyer, Mr Quakers, the former AGoF denied being a signatory to some companies allegedly linked to him.

    Nwabuoku had, in February 2025, opted for a plea bargain but later changed his mind.

    The ex-AGoF was earlier arraigned with Felix Nweke, who worked under him in the Federal Ministry of Defence.

    Both defendants, on Oct. 14, 2024, equally opted for a plea bargain agreement with the EFCC, which was eventually not carried through.

    The commission, subsequently, amended the charge and listed Nwabuoku as the sole defendant, with Nweke as one of its witnesses.

  • Court convicts, sentences ex-AGoF Nwabuoku to 72 years imprisonment for N868m fraud

    Court convicts, sentences ex-AGoF Nwabuoku to 72 years imprisonment for N868m fraud

     

    The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, convicted and sentenced Chukwunyere Nwabuoku, former acting Accountant-General of the Federation (AGoF), to a 72-year jail term without an option of fine.

    Justice James Omotosho, in a judgment, held that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had been able to prove the nine-count money laundering charge beyond reasonable doubt.

    According to the judge, the defendant is hereby convicted as charged.

    Jutsice Omotosho convicted Nwabuoku in all the nine counts and sentenced him to eight years imprisonment in each of the counts, making 72 years.

    The judge, however, ordered that the counts shall run concurrently.

    Justice Omotosho, who described Nwabuoku’s act of diverting funds meant for security and defence while he served as Director of Finance and Account in the Ministry of Defence as “appalling,” commended the EFCC for being detailed in its prosecution.

    The judge observed that the evidence of the 9th prosecution witness that Nwabuoku voluntarily refunded part of the siphoned money of over N200 million during investigation was not controverted by the defence.

    Nwabuoku was admitted to a N500 million bail with two sureties in the like sum after he was arraigned on Jan. 15, 2025, on a nine-count amended charge.

    The EFCC listed Mr Nwabuoku as the sole defendant in the charge marked FHC/ABJ/CR/240/2024, bordering on money laundering to the tune of N868 million.

    Nwabuoku was alleged to have perpetrated the act while serving as the Director of Finance and Accounts in the Ministry of Defence between 2019 and 2021.

    Details later