Tag: Trump

  • Trump will capture you if you rig 2027 election, PDP chieftain tells Tinubu, others

    Trump will capture you if you rig 2027 election, PDP chieftain tells Tinubu, others

     

    A chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Dr. Adetokunbo Pearse, has told President Bola Tinubu and other political actors not to rig the 2027 presidential election, saying that President Donald Trump would capture them.

    He said this in an interview on Arise Television on Sunday, adding that electoral malpractice could attract global consequences.

    According to Pearse, the era of unchecked election rigging is coming to an end, stressing that international institutions and powerful global actors would not ignore any attempt to undermine Nigeria’s democratic process.

    He said: “The whole international world is watching.

    “If you rig the election the way you normally do, you may have Trump coming to get your war chambers.

    “Everybody should be careful.”

    Pearse added that the presence of international judicial mechanisms such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) should serve as a deterrent to electoral misconduct.

    He said: “This is not the first time it has happened.

    “The International Criminal Court is there.

    “So be careful what you do with a rigged election in Nigeria.”

    Pearse expressed confidence that the 2027 elections would be different from previous ones, insisting that Nigerians would no longer tolerate electoral fraud.

    He said: “No, no, no — it will not happen again.

    “2027 is going to be different.”

  • Breaking: Trump Reportedly Bombard Nigeria With Massive Airstrikes On Bandits Hideout In Kaduna

    Breaking: Trump Reportedly Bombard Nigeria With Massive Airstrikes On Bandits Hideout In Kaduna

     

    Courtesy: Naijaonpoint

     

    Massive U.S. airstrikes on terrorist hideouts in Kaduna right now. At least three terrorist camps have been bombed before the Nigerian military moved in to finish them off. Trump reportedly called it a New Year gift to terrorists.

    According to reports, Gumi’s house has been totally destroyed in Kaduna.

    Sources claim the strikes were swift, devastating, and precise, sending shockwaves across the region. The operation has been described by allies of present U.S. President Donald Trump as a “New Year’s gift to terrorists,” though no official statement has yet been issued by U.S. or Nigerian authorities.

  • Nigeria’s Sovereignty, Security and Trump’s Christmas Bombs

    Nigeria’s Sovereignty, Security and Trump’s Christmas Bombs

     

    *By Paul Ejime

    If any Nigerians took lightly American President Donald Trump’s threat in November to deploy U.S. military ‘guns-a-blazing’ to Nigeria, over alleged mass killing of Christians by Islamic jihadists, the Senate President Godswill Akpabio, the nation’s number-three citizen, was not one of them.

    Speaking in the red chambers of the National Assembly in Abuja recently, Akpabio warned his fellow lawmakers against the lenient “bow-and-go treatment” of ministerial nominees, because Trump is on our neck.”

    However, even he must have been so surprised that Trump would direct the American Department of War airstrikes in Nigeria’s north-western Sokoto state so soon, as an unusual “Christmas present.”

    Villagers in Jabo, on the outskirts of the ancient city of Sokoto, were woken by unusual sounds and devastation from the American bombs on the evening of 25th December, while the unsavoury news of the strikes greeted other Nigerians on the morning of Boxing Day.

    Writing on his Truth Social platform, Trump said that under his direction, the U.S. launched a “powerful and deadly” strike against forces of the ISIS group in Nigeria, after accusing the Nigerian government of failing to stop the targeting of Christians.

    In a statement later, Nigeria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it was a joint/collaborative operation, involving “exchange of intelligence and strategic coordination in ways consistent with international law, mutual respect for sovereignty and shared commitments to regional and global security.”

    “The Federal Government continues to work with its partners through established diplomatic and security channels to weaken terrorist networks, disrupt their financing and logistics, and prevent cross-border threats, while strengthening Nigeria’s own security institutions and intelligence capabilities,” the statement added.
    Nigeria has been fighting multiple armed groups, including those affiliated with ISIS, such as Boko Haram, the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) and the lesser-known Lakurawa group, operating in the north-western states.

    Trump said the airstrikes were launched against IS militants “who have been targeting and viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians.”

    In November, he reinstated Nigeria on the list of Countries of Particular Concern CPC, and also ordered the Pentagon to begin planning for potential military action to curb “Christian persecution” in the country.

    The State Department also recently announced it would restrict visas for Nigerians and their family members involved in killing Christians.

    Like Trump’s threat in November, the airstrikes have elicited mixed reactions among Nigerians, with Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, a controversial Islamic scholar and a former soldier, urging Nigeria to “immediately halt military cooperation with the United States” because of the military operation, arguing that America’s involvement could escalate Nigeria’s security crisis and deepen religious divisions.

    On his Facebook page, he questioned America’s “moral authority,” warning that Nigeria should not be turned into a “theatre of war” for foreign powers.

    Gumi argued that “US involvement under the guise of protecting Christians could polarize Nigeria,” adding that airstrikes “alone cannot defeat terrorism.”

    He insisted that Africa’s most populous nation of more than 220 million people has enough personnel to handle its security challenges if properly organized, or instead, seek military assistance from China, Turkey, or Pakistan. Gumi, himself, has come under criticism for preferring dialogue with terrorists.

    For his part, former President Olusegun Obasanjo, in a recent viral video, dismissed calls for dialogue with terrorists, insisting that “Nigeria must adopt decisive measures and seek international assistance to confront worsening insecurity.”

    Meanwhile, the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has expressed concern that “Nigerians were notified of the American strike on terrorists… through …social media pages of President Trump and other American officials before the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a vague statement many hours later, offering a passive confirmation of the knowledge and cooperation of the Nigerian Government in the operation.”

    “This inverted communication approach does not help the Federal Government or Nigerians in any way, especially when taken against the background that the US military has been reported to have previously entered and operated in Nigeria successfully without the permission and knowledge of the government,” the party said.

    It urged “the Federal Government to ensure that the defence agreement with the United States …includes joint operations, which will ultimately result in knowledge-sharing and experiential learning to help Nigeria sustainably combat insecurity, rather than full, externally-led ‘precision attacks.’”

    When Trump threatened military action in Nigeria in November, some commentators pandering to patriotic sentiments raised the issue of national sovereignty. But that is now diluted by Nigeria’s recent military operation in neighbouring Benin to help foil an attempted military coup.

    Like Gumi, but perhaps for different reasons, many would argue that Nigeria has what it takes, militarily, to defeat Boko Haram and other terrorist armed groups.

    However, successive governments have failed since 2009, not for want of trying, but because of a combination of reasons, including religious and ethnic division, lack of political will, insincerity, corruption and sabotage.

    In 2012, former President Goodluck Jonathan disclosed that Boko Haram sympathizers were in his government. This was corroborated by former Foreign Minister Bolaji Akinyemi, who recently narrated how a US-assisted rescue plan for Chibok Girls was aborted in 2014 due to an information leak.

    “When the Chibok girls (more than 200 of them) were picked up by Boko Haram, the Americans came in quietly at the invitation of the Jonathan administration, and in collaboration with the Nigerian troops. They discovered the camp where the girls were being kept. And they said, all right, we will throw gas into those camps, and while everybody is sleeping, including the Boko Haram militants, we’ll go in with the Nigerian troops and take out the girls,” the former Minister said.

    However, he revealed: “When the Americans sent the reconnaissance aircraft over the camp, what did they find? Boko Haram militia were wearing (gas) masks, which means somebody within the Nigerian army had leaked to Boko Haram what the plan was.”

    Similar fifth-columnist betrayal could be blamed in the recent case of a Nigerian Army Gen. Musa Uba, reportedly killed after an ambush by ISWAP terrorists, who intercepted communication between him and his colleagues in North-east Borno state.

    No casualty figures have been made public, but there are concerns about possible civilian collateral damage in the type of airstrikes carried out against the reported Lakurawa group in Sokoto, which has become increasingly lethal in the region, often targeting remote communities and security forces.

    Many had thought that Sambisa Forest in Borno State, regarded as the epicentre of terrorists in northern Nigeria, would be a priority target. But security experts have explained that the Americans must have relied on actionable intelligence gathered after weeks of surveillance in picking their targets, indicating that Sokoto could be a key supply line for the terrorists.

    Still, Nigerian authorities have some explaining to do. For instance, what was the country’s input into the planning of the Christmas operation? If it was based on shared intelligence, how come Nigeria was rather reactive, given the time-lag between Trump’s tweet and the Nigerian Foreign Ministry’s statement on the airstrikes? And what is in it for the Americans, given that Trump is a self-processed deal-maker or transactional in his dealings?

    Nigeria and some other African countries have rejected U.S. requests to host  America’s African Military High-Command (AFRICOM). Has Nigeria finally given in to this request?

    The perennial ineffective communication was again a major failure by the Nigerian government on the Christmas airstrikes, which many Nigerians learned about through foreign media. Television interviews by Minister Yusuf Tuggar and subsequent explanatory statements by the Armed Forces and the Ministry of Information followed the statement by the Foreign Ministry.

    If the operation was coordinated, the initiative for public information should have come from Nigeria, the target of the airstrikes.

    With American Congressman Riley Moore saying on his X handle that the Christmas strikes were “just the first step to ending the slaughter of Christians and the security crisis affecting all Nigerians,” there is a need for better coordination and communication from both sides to clear all possible doubts and avoid unintended casualties.

    Additionally, if Nigeria is concerned about its national sovereignty, the government must prioritise the country’s security as part of its governance deliverable, beyond the laser focus on politicking and the next elections.

    The argument that terrorists also kill people of other faiths and not only Christians rings hollow. Under the Constitution, no Nigerian citizen deserves to die needlessly; be made a refugee, or forced into Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) camps, on account of his/her religion, ethnicity, creed, social status or political persuasion.

    The security of life, property, and citizens’ well-being are the primary responsibilities of any government.

    Nature abhors a vacuum, and an African proverb translates to “when a man leaves his farmland uncultivated for too long, other men can farm or appropriate it!”

    *Paul Ejime is a Media/Communications Specialist and Global Affairs Analyst*

  • BREAKING: US has successfully carried out military strikes in Nigeria – Trump announces

    BREAKING: US has successfully carried out military strikes in Nigeria – Trump announces

    President of the United States of America, Donald Trump, has announced US military strikes in Nigeria.

    Trump, who made the announcement on Christmas day, said that was the beginning of more of such attacks.

     

    He said the powerful and deadly air strikes on terrorists hideouts located in Sokoto, a north western state in Nigeria, was against ISIS-affiliated terrorists.

    Recall that sometime in November 2025, Trump cried out over the killing of Christians in the north west and north central regions of Nigeria.

     

    The US leader warned that his administration would not allow this to continue, vowing to strike the terrorists at their hideout.

    After several deliberations with Nigerian authorities following the threat, both side announced that agreements have been reached on the way forward.

     

    Suddenly, the US government announced that it struck terrorists in Sokoto forest on Thursday night.

     

    “In my direction as Commander in Chief, the United States launched a powerful and deadly strike against ISIS Terrorist Scum in Northwest Nigeria,” Trump wrote on his Trust Social.

    Trump said there will no place for radical Islamic terrorism under his leadership.

  • Breaking: US launches attack on terrorists in Nigeria +

    Breaking: US launches attack on terrorists in Nigeria +

     

    The United States of America has launched a deadly attack on terrorists in Nigeria.

    The attack, on Christmas Day, was confirmed by the President of the United States of America, Donald Trump, on Thursday.

    Further explanation by the US Africa Command in a post on X had it that the attack was carried out in Sokoto State.

    Confirming Trump’s post, the US Africa Command said it conducted a strike, which killed multiple terrorists who belong to the Africa branch of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

    The Africa branch of the ISIS are known as the Islamic State of West Africa Province (ISWAP).

    “At the direction of the President of the United States and the Secretary of War, and in coordination with Nigerian authorities, U.S. Africa Command conducted strikes against ISIS terrorists in Nigeria on December 25, 2025, in Sokoto State,” the post by the US Africa Command read.

    Trump in an earlier post on Truth Social had said: “Tonight, at my direction as Commander in Chief, the United States launched a powerful and deadly strike against ISIS Terrorist Scum in Northwest Nigeria, who have been targeting and viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians, at levels not seen for many years, and even Centuries!

    “I have previously warned these Terrorists that if they did not stop the slaughtering of Christians, there would be hell to pay, and tonight, there was.

    “The Department of War executed numerous perfect strikes, as only the United States is capable of doing.

    “Under my leadership, our Country will not allow Radical Islamic Terrorism to prosper.

    “May God Bless our Military, and MERRY CHRISTMAS to all, including the dead Terrorists, of which there will be many more if their slaughter of Christians continues.”

    The US Defence Secretary, Pete Hegseth, in a separate post on X (formerly Twitter) wrote: “The President was clear last month: the killing of innocent Christians in Nigeria (and elsewhere) must end.

    “The @DeptofWar is always ready, so ISIS found out tonight — on Christmas.

    “Grateful for Nigerian government support & cooperation. Merry Christmas!”

  • The ethnic cleansing of the United States will destroy it

    The ethnic cleansing of the United States will destroy it

     

     

    By Heba Gowayed

    Trump’s racist remarks on Ilhan Omar and Somali immigrants reveals his vision for the US as a white Christian nation

    A rally on affordability in Pennsylvania on 9 December devolved into a racist tirade when Donald Trump said to the crowd: “We only take people from shithole countries. Why can’t we have some people from Norway, Sweden, just a few? … From Denmark. Do you mind sending us a few people? Send us some nice people. But we always take people from Somalia, places that are a disaster, right? Filthy, dirty, disgusting, ridden with crime.”

    Referring to the US representative Ilhan Omar’s hijab as a “little turban”, Trump continued: “She should get the hell out. Throw her the hell out.” His supporters erupted in chants of: “Send her back.”

    The rant is abhorrent and factually incorrect, but it does hold one truth – the Trump administration’s vision for the United States is one of a white Christian nation. And the path to accomplish it is through the exclusion and removal of all who do not fit that vision – in other words, through ethnic cleansing.

    To that end, Trump and his acolytes have increasingly been using the term “reverse migration” and even proposed an “office of remigration”. The idea, borrowed from white supremacists in Europe, understands immigrants as an inherent threat to the identity of what they imagine to be “white” nations. Immigrants’ forcible and systematic removal – remigration – is envisioned as a way to “restore” that whiteness.

    This vision of an ethnically cleansed, white US is being enacted in policy.

    Contrary to Trump’s ranting, the United States did in fact restrict admission to only include white, European immigrants by law through much of the past century. Racial quotas were only abolished through Black activism and the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 60s.

    Whether immigrants are welcome or not has always been an issue of racial inclusion in this settler colonial state – it is the mechanism by which we decide who belongs in this nation.

    Today, the Trump administration is closing immigration pathways by which people enter the US, and gain status when here. Asylum is dead. Resettlement is cancelled except, tellingly, for white Afrikaners. Temporary protective status, which protects people from deportation due to turbulence in their nations of origin, has been or will be cancelled for Haitians, Venezuelans, Nicaraguans, Syrians and others, leaving hundreds of thousands of people deportable to countries the US recognizes as unsafe. Fees for all immigration processes have sharply increased.

    Meanwhile, the Trump administration is exploring how to block pathways to citizenship for people who qualify. Citizenship ceremonies are being cancelled as people are being pulled out of line while waiting to take their oaths. Mohsen Mahdawi was detained on 14 April at his citizenship appointment for his participation in a civil pro-Palestinian protest at his university.

    Trump issued an executive order to cancel birthright citizenship – the mechanism by which formerly enslaved Black Americans became citizens – that has made its way to the supreme court. And he has said he would “absolutely” denaturalize American citizens if he could.

    While this commentary seems bombastic, it is not without precedent in United States history, where in the first half of the 20th century, hundreds of thousands of people were denaturalized due to politicized accusations of fraud, lacking “good moral character” or having “racial ineligibility” (ie not being white).

    These current policies sit against the backdrop of the grotesque expansion of the mass deportation system. In September, two months after the so-called Big Beautiful Bill was passed – adding $75bn to ICE’s budget, giving it a bigger budget than all but seven of the world’s militaries, and making it the highest-funded law enforcement agency in the federal government – the supreme court authorized ICE officers to racially profile people.

    This makes every person of color, regardless of status, a potential target. And, in a nation that remains segregated by race, where people of color often live apart from white people, ICE is terrorizing communities of color.

    US citizens have also been caught up in ICE raids: members of the Navajo and Mescalero nations; a Black man in Chicago with his birth certificate in his backpack; a 20-year-old in Minnesota of Somali origin who kept trying to show ICE officers his passport, only to be forced by officers to undergo a facial scan to prove his citizenship. The investment of millions of dollars in cybersurveillance technology – which can hack phones in a certain radius and uses AI to recognize faces and places – presents a violation of privacy for every single person in this country regardless of race or status.

    Meanwhile, the rhetoric that once justified deportations has been revealed as a lie. Data shows that the vast majority of immigrants detained have no criminal record. Concerns of the fiscal burden that immigrants pose (never actually borne out in data) are shown for their absurdity when Trump says there is “no price tag” on his mass deportation agenda. Somalis added $8bn to Minnesota’s economy, though their contributions should have no bearing on their humanity.

    There seems to be joy in the cruelty, when Trump trolls “I love the smell of deportations in the morning” as we watch men and women dragged from the arms of their children, sobbing. Many of them are sent to privatized detention centers rife with human rights violations that turn a profit on human lives – incentivized to limit healthcare, food and comfort to detainees to maximize shareholder profit.

    But it is not just through the physical brutalization that this ethnic cleansing is being executed. There is also violence in systematic disinvestment that disproportionately cuts essential lifelines for Black and brown people. The Big Beautiful Bill rolls back social spending, denying millions of people healthcare coverage, food benefits and welfare benefits. It enacts policies that exacerbate burdens of student debt. It raises the budgets of police and carceral facilities.

    The idea that those who cannot be removed should be subjugated is alive in our academic institutions, through attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion, on students’ right to dissent, on affirmative action.

    The strength of this imperfect nation, which has never repaired for its original sins of genocide and enslavement, is in the incredible diversity of people who make it great, in the freedoms it claims to uphold – of life, liberty and justice. This ethnic cleansing can only be accomplished through the destruction of all of the above, in ways that touch the lives of each and every person within the nation, American or not.

  • Michael Dell unveils $6bn gift to ‘Trump accounts’ at White House

    Michael Dell unveils $6bn gift to ‘Trump accounts’ at White House

     

     

    PRESIDENT Trump was joined by Dell Technologies founder Michael Dell and his wife Susan on Tuesday afternoon at the White House to unveil a $6.25 billion gift from the couple to supplement new savings accounts for young children that were passed into law earlier this year.

    Dell’s donation will go to the US Treasury, where in the year ahead it will be deposited in $250 increments into 25 million “Trump accounts” for children aged 10 or younger in low- and middle-income areas.

    This private money will be in addition to $1,000 in federal dollars authorized in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act for newborn children as part of an overall program that is set to formally begin next July.

    Trump called Dell’s multibillion-dollar gift “big stuff, I don’t care who you are” at the White House on Tuesday, promising the new accounts would amount to “trust funds for every American child.”

    Dell then took the microphone and said he was happy to offer his support.

    “We believe that the best investment we can make is an investment in children,” the businessman said. He called the new accounts “a platform” for family, friends, and companies to contribute to, saying he has already been lobbying other wealthy Americans to give money as well.

    The outside money to start the accounts can be supplemented with annual after-tax contributions of up to $5,000 from the child’s parents and other sources. Employers will also be able to contribute up to $2,500 of that total.

    The accounts are then required to be invested in low-cost index funds.

    The massive gift from the Dells could increase the appeal of these accounts after financial experts have raised questions about their ultimate value, noting the restrictions on where the money can be invested and that the contributions come from after-tax dollars and that eventual withdrawals will also be taxable.

    The money becomes accessible after the child turns 18, when the account holder will be encouraged to make withdrawals to pay education expenses or buy a first home.

    The accounts were also applauded Tuesday by an unusual bipartisan pairing when Sens. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, and Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, jointly released a letter to the CEOs of Fortune 1000 companies urging them to support the accounts.

    Booker posted his support on social media, comparing the accounts to an idea for “baby bonds” he has long touted.

    Michael Dell is the 11th-richest person in the world, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, with $148 billion. He and his wife have long given money to family-focused causes.

    He appeared at the White House in June to tout the accounts, calling them “a simple yet powerful way to transform lives”

    Culled from Realnews

  • Trump Claims: A Wake-up Call and Expressions of Solidarity with Nigeria

    Trump Claims: A Wake-up Call and Expressions of Solidarity with Nigeria

     

     

    *By Paul Ejime

    In most cases, when the so-called developed world or its leaders focus on the countries of the “Global South,” particularly in Africa, which they once described as the “dark continent,” it is usually for the benefit of the Global North or for the wrong/negative reasons – war, poverty, disease, conflicts, exploitation, corruption, and similar vices.

    So, when American President Donald Trump, the acclaimed leader of the Global West, unusually turned his omnidirectional radar on Nigeria, Africa’s most populous Black Nation, he did not disappoint.

    In 2018, during his first presidency, Trump called Haiti and African countries “shithole countries.”

    However, between 31st October and 1st November, 2025, Trump took his scathing, incendiary and derogatory remarks a notch higher.

    In a tweet on 31 October via his Truth Social, he claimed that “Christianity is facing an existential threat in Nigeria. Thousands of Christians are being killed. Radical Islamists are responsible for this mass slaughter. I am hereby making Nigeria a Country of Particular Concern (CPC)…”

    In his second tweet on 1 November, Trump warned that “If Nigerian government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria and may very well go into that now disgraced country ‘guns-a-blazing’ to completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities.”

    The CPC label is for nations “engaged in severe violations of religious freedom” under the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998. The designation is largely symbolic, but U.S. law states that “governments must take targeted responses to violations of religious freedom.”

    Trump first put Nigeria on the CPC list in 2020, but President Joe Biden delisted the country in 2021.

    As expected, Nigerian government officials have come out blazing in their rejection and condemnation of the claim of “targeted Christian genocide” in the country.

    In his first public response to Trump’s tweets, President Bola Tinubu, on Thursday, 6 November, reaffirmed his commitment to eradicating terrorism and deepening Nigeria’s diplomatic relations.
    “We are engaging the world diplomatically, and we assure all… that we will defeat terrorism…,” he said, before the Federal Executive Council’s closed-door meeting.

    It remains unclear whether the Nigerian leader would meet with his American counterpart to clear things up as earlier announced by his aides.

    Meanwhile, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the European Union Delegation to Nigeria and ECOWAS, through its Head, Ambassador Gautier Mignot, have expressed support and solidarity with Nigeria, noting that terrorist attacks in the country were not limited to any religion or ethnic group.

    “Our position is one of solidarity with Nigeria. Solidarity with the victims of violence, with the authorities working to protect citizens, and with the Nigerian people who overwhelmingly desire peaceful coexistence beyond ethnic and religious divides,” Mignot told NAN (News Agency of Nigeria). “We respect Nigeria’s sovereignty and constitutional commitment to religious neutrality.”

    He promised that “the EU was ready to enhance its support in peace, security and defence matters, as well as through dialogue with all stakeholders…”

    In the same vein, the African Union “urges external partners, including the United States, to engage Nigeria through diplomatic dialogue, intelligence-sharing, and capacity-building partnerships…,” to tackle terrism.

    China has also rejected the US threat of military action against Nigeria, while Russia said, “We are closely monitoring this issue and call on all parties involved to strictly comply with international legal norms.”

    For context, Trump’s tweets made no mention of ‘genocide,’ and he did not provide any timeline for the killings.

    But some Nigerian clerics and right-wing U.S. Republicans, particularly Texas Senator Ted Cruz, have made more elaborate claims. In a post on his X handle, Cruz said: “Officials in Nigeria are ignoring and even facilitating the mass murder of Christians by Islamist jihadists. It’s time to hold those responsible accountable. My Nigeria Religious Freedom Accountability Act would target these officials with powerful sanctions and other tools.”

    Citing figures from Open Doors and other reports, US Congressman Riley Moore claimed that more than 7,000 Christians had been killed in 2025 alone and that “at least 19,100 Churches have been attacked or destroyed since 2009.” While acknowledging that “Nigerians of all faiths faced terrorism,” he said, “Christians are far and away the most targeted for persecution and violence.”

    In March this year, Evangelist Ezekiel Dachomo, a regional leader of the Church of Christ in Nations, posted a video of a mass burial of victims of an attack in Heipang community near Jos, Nigeria’s Middle-Belt region.

    The clip went viral on social media, and in an interview published by a Nigerian newspaper on 25 March 2025, the Evangelist said, “I made the video for record-keeping so that future generations will be able to see how we were terrorised and persecuted. The video is also evidence that a Christian genocide is going on in the North (of Nigeria).”

    That was not the first time that “genocide” or “Christian persecution” claims would be made against Nigeria. In its report early this year, a pro-Christian organization, Open Doors, listed Nigeria as among the “most persecuting countries.”

    The report claimed that “More believers are killed for their faith in Nigeria than anywhere else in the world.”

    Other foreign-based religious organisations, such as the ACI, EWTN, and The Tablet, had also expressed concern about the reported persecution of Christians in the country.

    On 12 March 2025, the Most Reverend Wilfred Anagbe, the Catholic Bishop of Markudi, in Nigeria’s Central Benue State, took the claim of anti-Christian attacks to the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Africa Subcommittee.

    The cleric alleged that: “A long-term, Islamic agenda to homogenize the population has been implemented over several presidencies, through a strategy to reduce and eventually eliminate the Christian identity of half of the population.”

    “This strategy includes both violent and non-violent actions, such as the exclusion of Christians from positions of power, the abduction of Church members, the raping of women, the killing and expulsion of Christians, the destruction of churches and farmlands of Christian farmers, followed by the occupation of such lands by Fulani herders. All of this takes place without government interference or reprisals,” he added.

    Specifically, Bishop Angbe told the Congress Committee: “I ask you to redesignate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern. This has both a practical and diplomatic meaning, to signal that you are paying attention to what happens to us.”

    “Second, I urge the United States to condition any cooperation on the return of the IDPs (Internally Displaced Persons) to their ancestral homes and help them to rebuild their lives. I implore this august body to insist on the return and rehabilitation of all IDPs to their ancestral lands, and NOT to relocate them to other constructed camps elsewhere…” the cleric concluded.

    Earlier in March 2024, Bishop Anagbe had also told the American Congress that “Christians in Nigeria have for decades been under assault from terrorist groups such as Boko Haram, Islamic State West Africa Province, ISWAP, and most recently, Fulani herdsmen who have perpetrated massacres of Christian communities.”

    The Nigerian Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, has dismissed these claims and accused some US lawmakers of “relying on inaccurate and misleading data to allege a so-called Christian genocide in Nigeria.”

    “Yes, there are Christians being attacked, but these criminals do not target one religion; they attack both Christians and Muslims, especially in the northern part of the country,” Idris said, warning that false narratives could embolden criminal groups.

    Beyond politicking, denial, deflection, trading of figures, finger-pointing and a fixation on the categorisation of the killings, the undeniable reality is that Nigeria, like most countries today, has a serious and complex problem of insecurity/terrorism. The problem predates the Tinubu administration, but his government has a duty to address it frontally and effectively, unilaterally or in collaboration/partnership with other countries/stakeholders.

    America is one of Nigeria’s major partners in the fight against terrorism, and this partnership should be strengthened, not weakened. In November 2020, U.S. special forces (SEALS), rescued an American citizen, Philip Walton, kidnapped in Nigeria.

    Trump’s brash approach and uncomplementary language could be discomforting and irritating. There might be ulterior motives or a hidden agenda behind his unsolicited interventions or ‘meddling.’ But his consequential tweets should be seen more as a wake-up call on Nigerian authorities to rise to their responsibilities.

    The American leader is not known for diplomatese.
    However, Abuja should face the reality so that the U.S. and Nigeria can work as strategic partners for mutual benefits, beginning with the appoinment of a Nigerian envoy to Washington D.C.

    The endless killing of Nigerians by Nigerians or foreign insurgents, for whatever reason is unacceptable and must stop.
    Nigerians should set aside political, ethnic and religious differences and unite to work collectively for the overall progress and development of their country.

    The primary responsibility of any government is the security of life and property, the guarantee of welfare and the protection of citizens’ rights.

    By constitution, Nigeria is a secular nation, and every citizen should be free to practice their faith without let or hindrance.

    Chapter IV, Section 42 of Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution (as amended), prohibits discrimination based on ethnic group, place of origin, sex, religion, or political opinion. The same constitution also provides for unfettered justice and government protection of citizens against persecution, and the prompt prosecution of crimes and criminals.

    *Paul Ejime is a Media/Communications Specialist and Global Affairs Analyst*

  • Nigeria on U.S. watchlist: Chief Imam, Academic propose solutions

    Nigeria on U.S. watchlist: Chief Imam, Academic propose solutions

    FlowerbudNews/ A university don, Prof. Amidu Sanni, has described U.S. President Donald Trump’s war rhetoric against Nigeria as “the misadventure of a reckless outburst.”

    Sanni, the immediate past Chief Imam of Lagos State University, who said this in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on Sunday in Lagos.

    The renowned cleric, however, added that the impending invasion could be prevented if the government acted with urgency.

    NAN reports that the Trump administration recently announced that Nigeria would be designated a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) under U.S. law for alleged religious freedom violations.

    But Sanni said It was ironic to turn a sudden human rights activist while ignoring the massacres in Gaza or Sudan.

    He nonetheless added: “The sleepless nights being ‘enjoyed’ or suffered by the Nigerian government are self-inflicted; they are the outcome of systemic failure.”

    According to him, the failures include poor international relations, uncoordinated security architecture, poor media engagement by state actors at local and international levels, and mischievous or uninformed interpretations by local and foreign non-state actors.

    He added that the pervasive, senseless killings ravaging Nigeria over the years—especially since the Boko Haram onslaught in 2000—had claimed lives irrespective of faith.

    Sanni blamed the systemic failures of successive civilian administrations since the 1999 return to democracy for their inability to address economic, political, and security challenges, which he said were at the root of the killings across the country.

    He noted that failure of state and non-state actors to tackle security challenges had fueled banditry, kidnapping, illegal mining, diversion of security funds, and impunity for offenders.

    “Trump becoming more Catholic than the Pope, or more Anglican/Protestant than the Archbishop of Canterbury, should be rightly seen in light of the economic reforms being pushed by the Nigerian government in the oil and financial sectors,” he said.

    “These reforms are dislodging the American and Western stranglehold on our economy and denying free petrodollars and unearned foreign exchange to the round-tripping bourgeoisie who had hitherto enjoyed free funds and influence.

    “Trump’s proclaimed war threat is simply economic and political.

    “Unfortunately, some of our religious opinion leaders seem to endorse Trump’s suicidal and less-than-altruistic military or missionary misadventure.

    “Many people fail to realise that war is not about who is right, but who is left after the bitter engagements.”

    He also criticised the government’s diplomatic lapses, noting that Nigeria had yet to appoint substantive ambassadors to key world capitals almost three years into the current administration.

    “That the President has not fully utilised international platforms such as the UN General Assembly and the G20 to tell Nigeria’s true story and rebrand our economic and political profiles is unacceptable,” he said.

    Sanni, however, faulted the government’s media strategy, saying the presidency had not institutionalised periodic presidential parleys with local and international media, a gap that, he said, worsened misinformation about the country.

    He urged the Christian Association of Nigeria and the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs to jointly tell the world that Muslims and Christians in Nigeria stand united against all violations of human rights.

    Meanwhile, Prof. Freedom Onuoha, has urged President Bola Tinubu to immediately assemble a high-level diplomatic contact group to hedge against possible U.S. intervention.

    Onuoha is the Coordinator of the Security, Violence, and Conflict Research Group at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN),

    In a telephone interview with NAN, Onuoha said the diplomats should engage more intensely with Washington to identify areas of disagreement and work out more beneficial strategic responses to Nigeria’s security concerns.

    “The issuance of terse, ambiguous official statements or responses is not enough right now,” he said.

    “It needs to be matched with clear-eyed, follow-through bilateral diplomatic contact and engagement.”

    Onuoha added that the Nigerian government must reset its approach to dealing with non-state actors by properly resourcing the military and reforming the police.

    “The president must urgently reform the police to assume its rightful place in providing internal security so the military can focus on confronting non-state actors,” he said.

    “This will enable the military to be more aggressive and offensive in tackling these groups, irrespective of their ideological, religious, or ethnic leanings.”

    He further advised President Tinubu to establish a high-level Truth and Reconciliation Commission to address injustices and deprivations fueling violent conflicts across communities.

    “Nigeria’s security crisis did not start today and will not end any time soon, whether or not the U.S. designates Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern,” Onuoha said.

    “For too long, the Nigerian state — under successive administrations since 1999, especially from 2008 — has proven incapable of protecting its citizens from brutal attacks by armed non-state actors.

    “The inconsistent approach of granting amnesty to some groups while being unjustifiably brutal to others gives the impression that state officials are complicit in the persistence of violence and killings.”

    NAN