Category: Judiciary

  • Yahaya Bello asks Abuja court to set aside arrest warrant against him

    Yahaya Bello asks Abuja court to set aside arrest warrant against him

     

    Flowerbudnews

    Former Governor of Kogi, Alhaji Yahaya Bello, on Thursday, prayed a Federal High Court, Abuja to set aside an arrest warrant issues against him.

    Bello, through his team of lawyers, including Adeola Adedipe, SAN, and Abdulwahab Mohammed, SAN, told Justice Emeka Nwite that the court lacked jurusidction to grant the order in the first instance.

    Mohammed, who led the team, told Justice Nwite when the matter was called for the ex-governor to be arraigned by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on 19-count money laundering charge.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Justice Nwite had, on Wednesday, ordered that EFCC should be issued a warrant for the arrest of Bello.

    The judge, who granted the order, directed that Bello should be brought to court today to take his plea in the charge preferred against him.

    Mohammed informed the court that a preliminary objection had already been filed before the court to the effect.

    The lawyer, who urged the court to vacate the arrest warrant order, said a High Court of Kogi had on Feb. 9 restrained the anti-graft agency from arresting, detaining or prosecuting Bello.

    He said the order was challenged by the EFCC at the Court of Appeal and the matter was already fixed for hearing.

    Mohammed said that the arrest warrant the commission surreptitiously got from the court was an attempt to bring the court on collision course with the Appeal Court.

    He said the issue of jurisdiction was a threshold which the court must address fisrt.

    However, EFCC’s lawyer, Kehibde Pinhero, SAN, disagreed with Mohammed’s submission.

    He said the matter was fixed for Bello’s arraignment and Mohammed, having announced appearance for the ex-governor, could be served in the open court for the matter to proceed.

    He said the arrest warrant was to ensure that Bello was produced in court to stand his trial since all efforts to effect the service on him had proved abortive.

    The hearing is still ongoing as at the time of filing the report.(NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

    •======

    Details later …….

  • Alleged N80.2billion Money Laundering:  EFCC Arraigns Yahaya Bello April 18

    Alleged N80.2billion Money Laundering:  EFCC Arraigns Yahaya Bello April 18

     

     

    By Danladi Ahmed

    Abuja (Flowerbudnews):  The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, will on Thursday, April 18, 2024 arraign a former governor of Kogi State,  Yahaya Adoza  Bello before a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja.

    He will be arraigned before Justice Emeka Nwite alongside three other suspects,  Ali Bello, Dauda Suleiman and Abdulsalam Hudu on 19- count charges bordering on money laundering to the tune of N80, 246,470, 088.88( Eighty Billion, Two Hundred and Forty Six Million, Four Hundred and Seventy Thousand and Eight Nine Naira,  Eighty Eight Kobo).

    Dele Oyewale, EFCC Spokesman disclosed this in a statement on Wednesday in Abuja, a copy of which was made available to Flowerbudnews.

    Bello’s arraignment is coming on the heels of a warrant of arrest and enrolment order granted the EFCC by the court on Wednesday, April 17, 2024.

    Count one of the charges reads: That you,  Yahaya Adoza Bello, Ali Bello, Dauda Suliman, and Abdulsalam Hudu( Still at large), sometime, in February, 2016, in Abuja within the jurisdiction  of this Honourable Court, conspired amongst yourselves to convert the total sum of N80, 246,470, 088.88( Eighty Billion, Two Hundred and Forty Six Million, Four Hundred and Seventy Thousand and Eight Nine Naira,  Eighty Eight Kobo), which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of the proceeds of your unlawful activity  to wit, criminal breach of trust and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(a) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the Money Laundering ( Prohibition) Act, 2011 as amended”.

    Count 17 of the charges read: “That you Yahaya Bello between 26th July 2021 to 6th April 2022 in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this Honourable  Court aided E-Traders International Limited to conceal the aggregate sum of  N3081,804,654.00( Three Billion, Eighty One Million Eight Hundred and Four Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty Four Naira) in account number 1451458080 domiciled in Access Bank Plc, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of proceeds of unlawful activity to wit, criminal breach of trust and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(a), 15(2) (d) of the Money Laundering ( Prohibition) Act, 2011 as amended and punishable under Section 15( 3) of the same Act.

    Count 18  of the charges reads: “That you Yahaya Adoza Bello  sometime in November 2021 in Abuja within the jurisdiction  of this Honourable Court  indirectly procured E-Traders international Limited to transfer  the aggregate sum of $570,330.00( Five Hundred and Seventy Thousand , Three Hundred and Thirty Dollars) to account number 4266644272 domiciled in TD Bank, United States of America which sum you reasonably  ought to have known  forms part of proceeds of unlawful activity to wit, criminal breach of trust and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 15(2) (d) of the Money Laundering ( Prohibition) Act, 2011 as amended and punishable under Section 15( 3) of the same Act”.

     

    The Commission’s attempt to execute the Warrant of Arrest lawfully obtained against Bello met stiff resistance  on Wednesday,  April 17,  2024.  The security cordon around the former governor’s residence in Abuja was breached by the current Governor of Kogi State, Usman Ododo who  ensured that the suspect was spirited away in his official vehicle.   As a responsible law enforcement agency,  the EFCC exercised restraint in the face of the provocation, waiting for his arraignment on Thursday, April 18,  2024.

    It is needful to state that Bello is not above the law and would be brought to justice as soon as possible. (Flowerbudnews,)

     

     

     

     

  • INEC closes defence in SDP, Ajaka’s petition against Gov. Ododo’s election victory

    INEC closes defence in SDP, Ajaka’s petition against Gov. Ododo’s election victory

     

     

    Flowerbudnews

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), on Tuesday, closed its defence in the petition filed by the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and its candidate, Murtala Ajaka, against the election victory of Gov. Usman Ododo of Kogi.

    INEC’s counsel, Uchenna Njoku, made this known to the Kogi State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Abuja, shortly after he tendered more documents against the SDP’s petition.

    Njoku told the three-member panel of justices, led by Justice Ado Birnin-Kudo, that INEC did not intend to call any witness having assessed the case of the petitioners.

    “My lords, the 1st respondent, having reviewed the state of pleadings in this petition, the evidence elicited from petitioners’ witnesses under cross examination, and the documents so far tendered in evidence by the 1st respondent, considers it reasonable not to further belabour the tribunal with the calling of witnesses.

    “In the circumstances, the 1st respondent (INEC) applies to close its case,” the lawyer said.

    Justice Birnin-Kudo, who declared the commission’s case closed, adjourned the matter until April 16 for Gov. Ododo (2nd respondent) to open its defence.

    It would be recalled that INEC conducted the Kogi governorship election on Nov. 11, 2023.

    However, the SDP and its governorship candidate in the poll are challenging the declaration of Ododo of the All Progressives Congress (APC) as the winner of the poll.

    In the petition, INEC, Ododo and APC are listed as 1st to 3rd respondents respectively.

    Earlier in the course of Tuesday’s proceedings, Njoku told the tribunal that INEC brought the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) devices used for the election as ordered by the court on Nov. 25, 2023.

    Njoku also tendered three sets of documents, which included a letter, dated Feb. 22 forwarding the BVAS, a document containing the summary of the BVAS devices and another documents containing the BVAS’ identification numbers.

    When Njoku applied to tender the documents, Ibrahim Sanni Mohammed, SAN, who appeared for Ododo and Ayo Asala, SAN, who appeared for the APC, did not object to the admissibility of the exhibits.

    Lawyer to SDP and Ajaka, Pius Akubo, SAN, objected on the grounds that it was only documents that were tendered without the actual exhibits.

    Ruling, tribunal’s Chairman, Justice Birnin-Kudu, admitted the documents as exhibits and marked them accordingly.

    The BVAS tendered were in relation to seven LGAs, including Okehi, Ajaoukuta, Basa, Ogori-Magongo, Lokoja, Adavi and Okene.

    Meanwhile, Ododo has indicated his readiness to open his defence on Wednesday.

    His lawyer, Mohammed, disclosed this upon being asked by the tribunal’s chairman when the 2nd respondent was willing to open his defence.

    Mohammed assured the tribunal that his client was ready to commence his defence on Wednesday.

    NAN reports that the electoral umpire, on Monday, tendered some electoral documents used in the conduct of the poll in defence of its case.(NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

  • Court transfers suit against Catholic priests, others to Lagos division for adjudication

    Court transfers suit against Catholic priests, others to Lagos division for adjudication

    Flowerbudnews

    A Federal High Court, Abuja, on Tuesday, transferred a fundamental rights enforcement suit filed against Catholic Archbishop of Lagos, Most Rev. Alfred Adewale Martins, and others to Lagos division of the court for adjudication.

    Justice Inyang Ekwo, in a judgment, held that it was in the interest of justice to transfer the matter since majority of the parties reside in Lagos.

    “I find that apart from the 4th defendant whose residence this court can take judicial notice as being in Abuja, the applicant, by the averments in the affidavit in support of this case, is in Enugu; the 1st respondent resides in Lagos, the 2nd respondent resides in Lagos, the 3rd respondent by the averments in his counter-affidavit, resides in Lagos, and the 5th respondent resides in Lagos.

    “With this evidence, I am of the opinion that this matter ought to have been filed in the Lagos Division of this court.

    “The expenditure imposed on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th respondents to defend this case in Abuja is not such that ought to be ignored.

    “Furthermore, as much as this suit is by affidavit evidence, the court must avoid a situation where in the consideration of the said affidavit evidence, it finds the need to invite parties to give oral evidence to resolve any area of conflict thereof.

    “Parties must be within the relevant territorial jurisdiction to avoid miscarriage of justice being occasioned on any of them.

    “It is in the interest of justice that this matter even though commenced in this division, to be heard in Lagos division.

    “I therefore make an order pursuant to the provision of Section 22 (1) of the Federal High Court transferring this case to Lagos division of this court forthwith for adjudication.

    “This is the order of this court,” the judge declared.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the applicant, Rev. Fr. Peter Ronald Scott, through his lawyer, Chibuzor Obiajunwa, had filed the suit to seek the protection of court against alleged threat of arrest and detention by the police.

    In the originating motion on notice marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/473/2022 and filed on April 8, 2022, Scott sued Most Rev. Martins, Rev. Fr. David Kipkrono, Mr Athoney Onwudiwe Ebo, Inspector-General (I-G) of Police, and Commissioner of Police, Lagos State, as 1st to 5th respondents respectively.

    He sought a declaration that Martins, Kipkrono and Ebo (1st to 3rd respondents) are not entitled to use I-G or the police commissioner (4th or 5th respondent) “to arrest or detain him in the guise of a police investigation over the decision of Mr Ebo Lawrence Chimaobi (3rd respondent’s son) to pursue his vocation abroad and all circumstances connected thereto.

    “An order of the court perpetually restraining the 1st to 3rd respondents from using the 4th and/or the 5th respondents, their agents, privies, associates, agents or any member of his congregation in the guise of a police investigation over the decision of Mr Ebo Lawrence Chimaobi to pursue his vocation abroad and all circumstances connected thereto. ”

    Scott, in his affidavit, averred that he was duly authorised to reside in Nigeria and presently in charge of the Nigerian Priory of a Catholic Congregation known as the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), and was duly registered as an incorporated trusteeship.

    According to him, SSPX was founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Francois Marie Joseph Lefebvre and against the wishes of the mainstream Catholic Church in 1988, and he consecrated four bishops to continue his work.

    “This resulted in his excommunication as well as the society from the mainstream Catholic Church, till date,” he said.

    Scott, therefore, alleged that Kipkrono, the parish priest of Saint Matthew Catholic Church, Amukoko, Lagos, and Lawrence’s father had accused him of kidnapping Lawrence, a 23-year old son, who completed his Electrical and Electronic Engineering degree from the Federal University of Technology, Owerri, in 2020, and proceeded to carry out his National Service programme at the SSPX’s present headquarters in Nigeria.

    He alleged that they had threatened to get him arrested because Lawrence had deeply desired to become an SSPX priest and in January 2022, he was accepted into the society’s seminary and also obtained a religious visa to Argentina.

    But in a counter affidavit deposed to by Mr Ebo, who is Lawrence’s father, the 1st to 3rd respondents disagreed with Scott.

    Ebo alleged that Lawrence was indoctrinated into Scott’s church during his first year in the university between the age of 15 and 16.

    He averred that upon completion of his degree programme, Lawrence was posted to Abuja for his National Youth Service but was advised and threatened by Scott to work his posting to Enugu State so as to continue the teachings and indoctrination into Scott’s church.

    Ebo said though he tried to get his son to work with a specialised company, he said Scott successfully convinced him (Lawrence) to work with the church.(NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

  • U.S. ex-President Trump stands historic criminal trial

    U.S. ex-President Trump stands historic criminal trial

     

    Xinhua

    Trump arrived at the court in Lower Manhattan around 9 a.m. with a heavy presence of security guards, press representatives as well as activists from different political camps.

    NEW YORK, April 15 (Xinhua) — Former U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday appeared in a criminal court in Manhattan, New York City, in the hush money case, making him the first former U.S. president to stand a criminal trial.

    Trump arrived at the court in Lower Manhattan around 9 a.m. with a heavy presence of security guards, press representatives as well as activists from different political camps.

    Trump descended from his motorcade and talked to the press briefly before entering the courtroom.

    “The trial is a political persecution… It’s an assault on America… it’s a country that’s failing,” said Trump.

    The case should never have been brought, said Trump, who also complained about the gag order imposed on him.

    Trump’s lawyers made at least three tries in the previous week in order to delay the trial but the requests were denied by judges.

    Facing 34 felony counts on falsifying business records in a bid to hide hush money payment of 130,000 U.S. dollars to porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016, Trump is expected to be present at the court very often as the trial goes on.

    The trial is expected to last six to eight weeks as jury selection kicked off on Monday, according to a release by New York State Unified Court System.

    Carrying flags and banners, a number of Trump supporters and critics went to Collect Pond Park in front of the court building, and they even traded barbs.

    “Our legal system is corrupt, and I’m here to stand with Trump because he’s much more honorable than our court system,” said Steve Merczynski, a New Yorker, who supports Trump by marketing themed hammocks and hammock chairs.

    Merczynski said the U.S. judicial system is partisan and the problem makes people don’t trust the system, noting that he expected Trump to be found guilty as the vast majority of the jury in New York City are Democrats.

    “The justice system is on trial… I think if Trump is found guilty, it shows we don’t have a fair system here, because this case should not have been brought. If he’s found not guilty, or if there’s a hung jury, I have faith in the system that at least some people know of the baloney that this case is a mistake,” he said.

    For Marc Leavitt, nevertheless, “this is a beautiful day for a trial and for the rule of law.”

    “I believe strongly in democracy. No man or woman is above the law. Everyone has the right to be proven innocent or guilty,” said Leavitt, who wore a placard criticising Trump.

    A group of protesters marched by the court building in the morning and carried a big banner which read “No one is above the law.”

    Leavitt said he believes Trump would get a fair trial in the hush money case and the Republican Party could have chosen a much more worthy candidate in the upcoming presidential election, but he also believes that Trump is guilty of subverting democracy and a “former embarrassment in chief and a scourge on our democracy.”

    Trump, the Republican Party’s presumptive presidential nominee in the 2024 U.S. general election, is facing four criminal indictments, and a conviction in one criminal trial would dampen his presidential campaign, analysts say.

  • EFCC Arraigns Father-in-Law, Daughter-in-Law for Alleged Forgery in Lagos

    EFCC Arraigns Father-in-Law, Daughter-in-Law for Alleged Forgery in Lagos

     

    By Biola Lawal
    Flowerbudnews:  The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, has arraigned a father-in-law,  Alaba Alakija and his daughter-in-law, Oyinkansola Alakija for alleged alleged conspiracy and using false documents.

    They were arraigned before Justice Mojisola Dada of the Special Offences Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos on Monday on an amended two-count charge bordering on alleged conspiracy and using false documents, EFCC Spokesman, Dele Oyewale disclosed in a statement.

    One of the counts reads: “Alaba Alakija and Oyinkansola Alakija, on or about the 6th day of August, 2015 at Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, with intent to financially benefit from the property located at No.10, Keffi Street, South-west, Ikoyi, Lagos, conspired amongst yourselves to use a false document titled: “Vesting Deed by Dr. Omodele Alakija and Mr. Afolabi Alakija”, the executors of the estate of the late Sir Ademola Alakija, purporting  same to be made by Dr. Omodele Alakija and Mr. Afolabi Alakija.”

    The defendants pleaded “not guilty” to the charges when they were to them.

    In view of their pleas,  prosecution counsel ,M. S. Owede prayed the court for a trial date and the remand of the defendants at a correctional facility.

    Counsel to the first defendant, M.O. Akangbe, SAN, informed the court of the bail application of his client, which he said he had filed and served on the prosecution. While praying to move the application, he  urged the court to grant bail to his client in the most liberal terms.

    However, counsel to the second defendant, Victor Giwa, prayed the court to move the bail application of his client orally. He told the court that he was informed about the matter late and that he came from outside the jurisdiction of the court.

    Giwa further stated that his client, whom he described as a lawyer, has a two month-old baby, whom she still breastfeeds, and that she would not jump bail. However, in a dramatic twist, the second defendant’s husband debunked the claim and told the court that their baby is nine months old.

    After listening to both parties,  Justice Dada granted bail to the first defendant in the sum of N10 million, with sureties in like sum, who must submit their international passports to the court.

    The court, however, took possession of the passport of the second defendant.

    Both defendants were released to their lawyers pending perfection of their bail conditions.

    The judge adjourned the matter  to May, 28 2024 for commencement of trial. (Flowerbudnews)

     

     

     

  • Alleged $4.5bn, N2.8bn Fraud: EFCC Presents First Witness against Emefiele, One Other 

    Alleged $4.5bn, N2.8bn Fraud: EFCC Presents First Witness against Emefiele, One Other 

     

    By Flowerbudnews

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on Friday, April 12, 2024, presented its first prosecution witness, PW1, Monday Osazuwa, a Senior Supervisor with the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, in the trial of a former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, Godwin Emefiele and one Henry Omeile.

     

    Emefiele and  Omoile were arraigned by the Lagos Zonal Command of the EFCC on Monday, April 8, 2024, on an amended 26-count charge bordering on alleged $4.5bn and N2.8bn fraud, a statement by EFCC Spokesman, Dele Oyewale disclosed.

    The former CBN Governor was specifically mentioned in counts one to four as well as  counts eight to 26 bordering on alleged abuse of office, contrary and punishable under Section 73 of the Criminal Law of Lagos 2011; accepting gratification, contrary and punishable under Section 8 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act 2000; corrupt demand, contrary and punishable under Section 10 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act 2000; receiving property fraudulently obtained, contrary to and punishable under Section 328 of the Criminal Law of Lagos 2011; and conferring corrupt advantage, contrary to Section 19 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act 2000.

    Omoile was mentioned in counts five, six and seven bordering on acceptance of gifts by agents, contrary to Section 65 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State 2015.

    One of the counts reads: “That you, Godwin Ifeanyi Emefiele, between 2022 and 2023 in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable court, directed to be done in abuse of the authority of your office as the Governor, Central Bank of Nigeria, an arbitrary act, to wit: allocating foreign exchange in the aggregate sum of $2,136,391,737.33 without bids, which act is prejudicial to the rights of Nigerians.”

    They pleaded “not guilty” to all the charges when they were read to them.

     

    At the resumed sitting on Friday,  Osazuwa, who was led in evidence by the prosecution counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, testified that he knew Emefiele from his time at Zenith Bank before becoming the CBN Governor.

     

    The PW1 said: “I worked with him from 2002 to 2014 at Zenith Bank; and then, 2014 to 2023 at the CBN.”

     

    In his examination-in-chief, he also testified that “ I also ran errands for him.

     

    “Sometime in 2020, he called me, while he was outside of Lagos, that he would give me a number to call and that I had something to collect for him.

     

    “The person confirmed the same and gave me another number that it was his boy who would give me.”

     

    He identified the first person as Mohit, who gave him the number of his boy, whom he identified as Mr. Raja.

     

    Continuing, he said : “So, I got there at Adeola Odeku and he welcomed me. I sat down and waited, as he brought the thing and gave me an envelope.

     

    “I said “What is in it?” , and Raja brought it out and counted it. Then, I sealed it back.”

     

    He further testified that the envelope contained $100,000 and that Emefiele was not around at the time.

     

    “So, he instructed me to give it to the second defendant for him.

     

    “That was not the end, as after a few weeks’ interval,  he said I should call Mohit, if he had anything.

     

    “Then, again ,I collected the money and they were not the same amount.

     

    “The first defendant said I should be finding out every Friday from Mohit if he had anything to give him.”

     

    He also testified that he was sometimes instructed by Emefiele to deposit cheques in the account of Dumies Oil and Gas.

     

    According to him, the second defendant resides in Emefiele’s  house in Ikoyi, Lagos.

     

    He said: “The highest money I collected from Mr. Raja was $1 million, and all the money was in cash.

     

    “There was also $850,000, $750,000, and $400,000.

     

    “I never took anything out of the money. He trusts me. He never said to me that I should take out of it.”

     

    Under cross-examination by the defence counsel, A. Labi-Lawal, he reiterated that he only acted on the instruction of Emefiele.

     

    Earlier in the proceedings, the Judge granted Emefiele bail in the sum of N50 million, with two sureties in like sum.

     

    The sureties must be within the jurisdiction of the court, with evidence of three years tax payment in Lagos.

     

    The second defendant, Omoile, was also granted bail in the sum of N1 million, with two sureties in like sum.

     

    The sureties must be blood relations of the defendant, with evidence of three years tax payment.

     

    In granting him bail, the court adopted the bail earlier granted to the defendant by Justice Sule Hamzat.

     

    “The bail documents must be transmitted to this court,” Justice Oshodi added.

     

    Labi-Lawal then applied for an interim bail, releasing the first defendant to the defence, pending perfection of the bail.

     

    Oyedepo prayed the court for accelerated hearing, and for “in camera” proceedings for the first to seventh witnesses, “because of their safety”.

     

    Responding, Labi-Lawal raised no objections to the prosecutor’s prayer for accelerated hearing, but raised objections to the prayer for in camera proceedings for the said witnesses.

     

    “The prosecution has not substantiated their claim, and so we want a formal application,” Labi-Lawal said.

     

    However, Oyedepo, argued that: “All we want is the protection of these witnesses, and I believe justice is what we are supposed to be seeking”.

     

    Thereafter, Justice Oshodi granted the prayer for accelerated hearing and ordered that a formal application for closed door session of proceedings be filed.

     

    “I adjourn the hearing of this application till April 29, 2024 and I direct that the hearing will be in closed session,” he said.

     

    Granting the prayer of the defence for interim bail, Justice Oshodi further ordered that the defence counsel should file an undertaking to produce the defendant on the next date.

     

    “The first defendant will be remanded at the Ikoyi Correctional Centre pending the undertaking by the defence counsel, which I must see,” Justice Oshodi said.

     

    Oyedepo then told the court that a witness of the prosecution was in court and “we are ready to proceed in open court.”

     

    The defence, however, argued that it was not prepared for commencement of trial.

     

    He further argued that he was yet to have access to his client to go through the proof of evidence and the allegations, as Emefiele had been in the custody of the EFCC.

     

    Justice Oshodi, however, held that the court had, on April 8, 2024, adjourned for trial, and so “request by the defence counsel is refused.”

    He also adjourned  the matter till April 29, May 3, 9 and 17, 2024 for continuation of trial. (Flowerbudnews)

     

     

  • Gov Aiyedatiwa gives lawyer 7-day ultimatum to retract certificate forgery allegations

    Gov Aiyedatiwa gives lawyer 7-day ultimatum to retract certificate forgery allegations

     

    Flowerbudnews

    Gov. Lucky Aiyedatiwa of Ondo State, on Monday, gave a legal practitioner, Oladotun Hassan, a seven-day ultimatum to retract his allegation of certificate forgery levelled against him or be sued.

    Aiyedatiwa, in a letter titled: “Defamatory Publications Against Mr Lucky Orimisan Aiyedatiwa” written by his counsel, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN, also demanded an apology in three national dailies.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the letter, dated April 8, was made available to newsmen in Abuja.

    “The above matter refers. We are solicitors to His Excellency, the Governor of Ondo State, Mr. Lucky Orimisan Aiyedatiwa (“our Client”) on whose behalf we write this letter on the above subject matter.

    “It has come to the attention of our client that by an unsolicited letter dated June 2, 2023, you caused to be authored and submitted to the Nigeria Police Force, an unsubstantiated complaint of misrepresentation, certificate forgery, examination malpractice and perjury, against our client.

    “Whereas, you are not a registered voter in or an indigene of Ondo State to possess the requisite locus to ground your said complaint.

    “Your petition was cleverly routed through unauthorized sources within the police force and without recourse to our client, a report was purportedly submitted to you by the police dated February 19, 2024.

    “You thereafter caused the said report to be widely circulated as the basis of a malicious design to disqualify our client from participating in the governorship primary election in Ondo State.

    “You thereafter caused another letter to be written to the National Secretariat of the All Progressives Congress (APC) with the same purpose of disqualifying our client from participating in the governorship primary election of the said party fixed for April 2024.

    “You have since led a vicious campaign of calumny against our client through these and other false publications, all of which have brought our client into public ridicule and opprobrium, albeit without any justification whatsoever,” he said.

    The senior lawyer also accused Hassan of writing another letter on April 5, alleging that Aiyedatiwa, instead of clearing his name on the alleged forgery, the governor conspired with DIG Sylvester Alabi to compromise police integrity.

    “The determination of whether a candidate sat for any examination conducted by the West African Examinations Council has been simplified by the organization through technology, and it is accessible to all.

    “Upon your chorused repetition of this falsehood against our client, we took steps to conduct a verification exercise and indeed confirmed the authenticity of his West African School Certificate Examination results.

    “We challenge you to proceed to do the same with the following particulars:

    “Name of the Candidate: Lucky Orimisan Aiyedatiwa Centre Number: 15592
    Examination Number: 019
    “Centre: Ikosi High School, Ikosi-Ketu, Lagos State. Date of Examination: May/June, GCE O/L, 1982.

    “The search will bring out the following results in favour of our Client: English Language: 8; Bible Knowledge: 6; Economics: 4; Health Science: 8; Commerce: 3; Accounts: 7; Business Management: 8,” he said.

    Adegboruwa alleged that Hassan’s intention was to stop Aiyedatiwa from contesting in the APC primary slated for April and the November governorship election in the state.

    He, therefore, gave him seven demands, including “adequate compensation for the false and libelous publications,” against the governor within seven days of receiving the letter of face a criminal charge.(NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

  • Detained Miyetti Allah leader yet to make valid statement in DIA custody, lawyer clarifies

    Detained Miyetti Allah leader yet to make valid statement in DIA custody, lawyer clarifies

     

    Flowerbudnews

    Mohammed Sheriff, counsel for the detained President, Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore, Bello Bodejo, on Monday, said his client was yet to make valid statement in the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA)’s custody.

    Sheriff, who is one of the team of lawyers representing Bodejo before Justice Inyang Ekwo of a Federal High Court, Abuja, stated this in reaction to a newspaper publication linking Gov. Abdullahi Sule of Nasarawa State with his current travail.

    The lawyer gave the clarification in a press release he signed and made available to newsmen in Abuja.

    It would be recalled that, in the media report titled: “How Nasarawa gov pressurised me to establish militia group, Miyetti Allah leader tells investigators” and published on Sunday, Bodejo was alleged to have accused Gov. Sule.of being behind the establishment of the ethnic militia group, Kungiya Zaman Lafiya.

    Bodejo, who is facing a three-count terrorism charge, was reported to have alleged in his confessional statement that the governor pressurised him to form the militia group.

    But reacting, Sheriff said their attention had been drawn to the publication “which unfortunately has been lifted and reproduced by many online media.

    “We hereby make this rebuttal to the statement regarding the alleged creation of ethnic militia by Bello Badejo being circulated by some sections of the media.

    “The publication purports to be quoting our client Abdullahi Bello Bodejo in a supposed extra-judicial statement to investigators.

    “We refute such publication as unreliable and such should be discountenanced by all.”

    According to him, we have been in constant touch with Abdullahi Bello Bodejo who is in the custody of Defence Intelligence Agency and can confirm that he was yet to make any valid statement to the Defence Intelligence Agency.

    “We are therefore shocked as to the source of the purported statement credited to him.

    “We urge a fair and unbiased approach to this matter, where all relevant facts are carefully examined, and legal procedures are followed diligently.

    “We trust that all concerned will uphold the principles of justice and act in accordance with the law.

    “We hasten to call on members of the public to disregard statements that do not emanate from fair and accurate report of judicial proceedings in public interest.

    “The matter is sub judice, It’s important to avoid making comments that could potentially influence ongoing legal proceedings or misrepresent the facts,” he concluded.

    Bodejo, who was arrested on Jan. 23 in Malia, Nasarawa State and kept in the custody of DIA, was arraigned before Justice Ekwo on March 22.

    His arrest was predicated on the alleged raising up an armed militia in detriment of the nation’s unity contrary to the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    The offence was said to be punishable under Section 29 of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

    He, however, pleaded not guilty to all the counts and the matter fixed for May 27, May 28, May 29 and May 30 for trial.