Year: 2026

  • Amoxillin is not banned in Nigeria, NAFDAC DG Clarifies

    Amoxillin is not banned in Nigeria, NAFDAC DG Clarifies

     

     

    By Biola Lawal

    Abuja (Flowerbudnews): NAFDAC Director General, Prof. Mojisola Adeyeye has announced that the Agency has not banned Amoxillin antibiotic medicine in Nigeria.

    Prof. Adeyeye made the declaration in a public statement she issued to dismiss a video circulating on the social media, claiming that Amoxillin has been secretly banned in Nigeria.

    The NAFDAC Boss described the video as ‘: misleading,” and entirely FALSE,” adding; ”NAFDAC has not banned Amoxicillin.’:

    Prof. Adeyeye stated that while NAFDAC ”routinely issues targeted safety alerts and recalls on specific substandard or affected batches of medicines, there is no blanket ban on the antibiotic in Nigeria.”

    Public Notice Read:
    The attention of NAFDAC has been drawn to a misleading video circulating on social media claiming that the Agency has secretly banned Amoxicillin in Nigeria. This claim is entirely FALSE.

    NAFDAC has not banned Amoxicillin. While the Agency routinely issues targeted safety alerts and recalls on specific substandard or affected batches of medicines, there is no blanket ban on the antibiotic in Nigeria.

    We urge the public, healthcare professionals, and stakeholders to disregard the misinformation and rely only on verified updates published on NAFDAC’s official channels.

    Kindly read the full statement for more details.

     

     

  • Rhoda, PAAU ‘s Undauting Best Graduating Student, Her Resilience, Her Hidden Secrets

    Rhoda, PAAU ‘s Undauting Best Graduating Student, Her Resilience, Her Hidden Secrets

     

    (Rhoda – The Outstanding)

     

     

    By Thompson Yamput

    On Jan. 23, 2026, history was amazingly made at the 7th combined convocation ceremony and the 25th anniversary of Prince Abubakar Audu University (PAAU) in Anyigba. Kogi State, following the emergence of a poor, calculated, determined and resilient female student as the overall best amongst the 26,160 graduands.

    That brilliant female student is Oyiza Rhoda Adinoyi, who, at her entrance into the university, was hardly recognised or known because of her humility and poor family background. But like a leopard, who can’t hide its spots, Rhoda was visible to closed mates, lecturers and acquaintances because of her simplicity, commitment, and academic brilliance and not in display of affluence or rich family background.

    With a CGPA of 4.93 and a student
    of the 2024–2025 academic session, Rhoda did not only emerge as the best graduating student in her department, History and International Studies, but also became the valedictorian, graduating as the overall best student of the institution to make history.

    The Vice Chancellor of PAAU, Prof. Marietu Ohunene-Tenuche, at the award of prizes to the 26,160 first-degree graduates, produced across the five academic sessions covered by the convocation, announced Oyiza Rhoda Adinoyi as the “Overall Best Graduating Student” with a laud evasion that quickly followed when called up.

    The state Governor, Alhaji Ahmed Ododo, who was conferred with Honorary Doctorate Degree on public administration, had described the occasion as a moment of academic reflection, institutional pride, and renewed commitment to the founding ideals of the university.

    Represented by his deputy, Joel Oyibo, the governor, reminded the graduating students that a university education goes beyond certificates.

    “Education is about building character, critical thinking, and integrity. You must use your knowledge responsibly and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the society,” he said.

    To Rhoda, it was a moment of academic reflection and renewed commitment. This is so because Oyiza Rhoda Adinoyi, right there, while collecting the award of the overall best graduating student, had made up her mind not to stop at that first degree level.

    Speaking to newsmen shortly after receiving her award, Rhoda, who was all smiles, said that her ultimate goal is to grap a PhD. in the near future, irrespective of her poor family background.

    “I am looking ahead. I hope to pursue advanced research through a Master’s degree, with the goal of eventually progressing to a PhD. I am open to opportunities and scholarships that will help make this dream a reality. Ultimately, I see myself becoming a professor of African history, with a broad focus on African intellectual history.

    “I am particularly interested in studying how Africans think, how indigenous knowledge systems operate, and how African societies have developed their own economic and social philosophies through colonial to postcolonial periods.

    “The truth is, I want to explore the ways Africans have intellectually shaped their continent and demonstrated African agency, literacy, and ingenuity. This, I believe, is a critical part of understanding Africa’s past, present, and future, ” she said.

    Telling her story, especially her background, the dreams, the push, and the commitment to achieve success in her academics and in life as a girl and citizen, who hopes to contribute her quoter to the development of Kogi and Nigeria as a whole.

    Academic Journey and Vision.

    Rhoda was part of the 2024–2025 academic session graduating students and did not only emerge as the best graduating student in her department but became the valedictorian, graduating as the overall best student of the university.

    The CGPA of 4.93 she made means a great deal to her. “To me, It is a reminder that I put in a lot of work, remained consistent, and stayed focused throughout my years of study. Above all, it reassures me that my efforts were not in vain and that I made the most of my academic journey, ” she said.

    She continued, “During the course of my studies, most notably in my first year, was the 5.0 GPA I got in my very first semester. That result gave me the courage and resolve I needed to keep striving for excellence throughout the remaining semesters until I graduated.

    “At that time, my then Head of Department, Prof. Patrick Ukase told me that in his many years as a lecturer, particularly in my institution, he had never seen a History student record a perfect 5.0 GPA. His words, alongside the encouragement of other lecturers, meant a great deal to me and further strengthened my determination.

    “To the glory of God, before I graduated, I recorded a 5.0 GPA in five semesters, which included both semesters of my final year. Ideally, I had hoped to achieve this across all eight semesters, but three semesters fell short of my expectations.

    “I often describe those moments as betrayals, yet I am grateful that I did not fall too far from the standards I set for myself. Although I sometimes feel a sense of sadness that I did not graduate with a perfect 5.0 CGPA, I am deeply thankful to God for the grace and ability to remain consistent and committed throughout my academic journey and the entire course of study.

    “But to consistently maintain a first-class standing requires a great deal of discipline, intentional targeting, resilience, and clear action plans. I remember my early days as a fresher when some senior students organized a tutorial for members of my class before lectures began.

    “During those sessions, we were told how difficult History was; how certain lecturers were tough, and how challenging it was to achieve high scores because of the level of critical thinking, analysis, and writing the discipline demands, especially during tests and examinations.

    “When I got home that day, I told myself that I was ready for the challenge because I had deliberately chosen History. I chose History because I grew up in a community where much of my people’s past remains undocumented.

    “As a result, other ethnic groups across Nigeria often hold fixed and sometimes negative perceptions of my tribe, the Ebiras (portraying us as tough or even wicked). I believe History helps us understand who we are, where we come from, and how such identities and labels are formed.

    “Beyond this, my love for History was also influenced by my father, who often told me stories about the past. But I never knew history existed as a course until a Facebook friend suggested it to me after a brief conversation regarding my interests.

    “Surprisingly, my passion for the discipline did not fully emerge at childhood nor from secondary school, where history was not taught in any of the schools I attended, untill later in life.

    “As a child, my aspirations shifted between wanting to be a pilot and a lawyer. I loved advocacy and had a strong dislike for injustice, and I believed that studying law would create the platform for me to speak up for myself, my family, and people at large.

    “Over time, however, I came to realize that history offers something equally powerful after I became aware of it’s existence in higher education. I soon realized that it does not only helps us understand the past but also reveals whose voices are represented and whose are silenced.

    “By uncovering those silenced voices, I found that history gives me the opportunity to restore agency and tell stories that might otherwise remain unheard. That realization was how history truly came alive for me.

    “The genuine love for the course was very much even before gaining admission was the foundation that sustained my strong academic performance. Beyond passion, I relied heavily on structure and planning. I always worked with a personal timetable, I did not give myself excessive rest; rather, I found rest in studying.

    “During holidays, I collected lecture notes and past questions, recommended textbooks and journals from senior students, and worked through them in preparation for the next semester.

    “By the time lectures began, most topics were already familiar to me. Still, I made it a priority to attend every lecture because while personal reading offers understanding, missing a lecture means missing the lecturer’s perspective, and that perspective often shapes tests and examination questions.

    “I also ensured that I read beyond what was taught in class. I studied both individually and in groups, and whenever I felt that studying alone was insufficient, I organized tutorials with friends. Teaching my classmates some challenging topics helped me understand them better myself.
    I believe that a combination of deliberate choice, passion, discipline, planning, consistency, and active learning was truly the magic behind my academic journey.

    The Struggle, the Secrets

    Rhoda said, often times people assume that those who achieve academic excellence are naturally intelligent, exceptionally gifted, emotionally strong, or simply blessed, but that “that is not always the case. For me, the journey only appears smooth now that the results are out; it was anything but smooth during the process.

    “There were many moments when I had to push myself to study under uncomfortable conditions. I do not enjoy studying late at night, but I learned to wake up very early. On lecture days, I could be awake as early as 1:00 a.m., studying through the morning. Even though it was demanding, it became part of my discipline.

    “Moments of self-doubt were very real for me, and they were largely triggered by financial constraints. I do not come from a wealthy or famous family. I come from a modest home where, by God’s grace, we could afford our daily meals and the things we truly needed, though not always the things we wanted.

    “My parents never had the privilege of attending a university, so being in higher education was not something I considered an entitlement; I saw it as a privilege, one that placed me where my parents had not been able to reach.

    “Financial hardship delayed my admission into the university for three years after I completed secondary school. During that period, my family faced serious financial struggles. My father had retired as a civil defence officer, not at a high rank, and my mother also retired after years of service in Primary Healthcare. Both of them retired around the same period I eventually gained admission.

    “At some point, I truly believed it would be impossible to accept that admission offer because there was simply no money. However, my parents took a leap of faith that I remain deeply grateful for. They secured a LAPO loan on my behalf, which covered most of my foundational fees and made my education possible.

    “While in school, I never received an allowance exceeding ₦15,000 for an entire semester. There were times I resumed school with less than ₦2,000, alongside basic food items such as garri, rice, and beans, in very moderate quantities, certainly not enough to last a full semester. I had to learn how to manage limited resources, and in a rather unusual way, hunger became one of my motivations to study.

    “Whenever I felt hungry, I picked up a book. As I read, I forgot the hunger. Somehow, my body adapted to that lifestyle.That experience taught me a powerful lesson: when the heart is fixed on a goal, the body eventually aligns with it. Mine did, and for that, I am deeply grateful.

    “There were also moments of emotional setback, particularly when I began to record B grades in some semesters. As I mentioned earlier, three of my semesters included such grades. Having achieved a 5.0 GPA in my very first semester, I had hoped never to fall from that standard. When I received my first B, it felt as though the world was crumbling beneath my feet, and I nearly slipped into depression.

    “However, I was able to bounce back when I came to understand that failure does not mean incompetence. Rather, it keeps us aler and forces us to restrategize, refocus, and re-evaluate our goals and purpose. Failure also teaches us to appreciate our victories. It made me realize that achieving a 5.0 GPA was uncommon and worth celebrating.

    “Above all, it taught me to appreciate myself and to give glory to God for every milestone along the wayI can nottt but equally acknowledge the great support system and opportunities that helped me overcome some of the struggles and exhaustion I faced while in school. From the very first day to the end of my studies, I was intentional about the friends I chose.

    “I was never a friend of everybody, but was open to everyone. I did not form close bonds with everyone. Instead, I chose people in whom I saw a light similar to mine, a passion aligned with mine, and who were like-minded.

    “We shared ideas, organized tutorials, and learned together. My friends became a true support system: they celebrated my victories and stood by me in the moments that were not so rosy, offering encouragement and solidarity. I equally blocked all emotional relationships because I can not afford to be distracted from my goal. I also thank God for the gift of mentorship.

    “I was privileged to have lecturers, who became my mentors, guiding me in practical skills as a would-be-historian and helping me to excel. One of such mentors is Dr. Danladi Abah, currently at the University of Ghana. He provided hands-on experience, made me his research assistant, and introduced me to reading and reviewing books and papers that I would not have otherwise encountered.

    “Through him, I also came to understand the importance of professional membership. Today, I am proud to belong to several professional bodies relevant to my field, notably the Lagos Studies Association and the Historical Society of Nigeria, among others.
    I was also fortunate to benefit from opportunities that eased some of my financial burdens.

    “During the second year of my program, I became an awardee of the HillCity Foundation, after being recommended by my examination officer to an alumnus, who eventually facilitated my application. Only last year, 2025, I emerged as the lead coordinator of the Academic Excellence Awardee, which was a deeply rewarding experience for me.

    “These opportunities and support systems made my journey seamless and allowed me to see beyond the classroom. They also developed my ability to multitask. For instance, during my final year first semester, I was simultaneously writing my project and preparing a paper for the Lagos State Association Conference. With mentorship and support, I could manage both successfully.

    “I firmly believe that every university deserves lecturers who go beyond delivering lectures. They should ensure that students gain practical skills, employ them as research assistants, and provide platforms that allow them to excel. The support and opportunities I received helped me feel exceptional rather than ordinary, and I will always be grateful for that.

    “Being the overall best graduate student is deeply fulfilling and truly gives me goosebumps. While I wouldn’t say I expected it, I knew I had put in the work, and for that, I am immensely grateful to God, my family, and my mentors, who believed in me and constantly encouraged me to stretch myself and be more productive. That effort has paid off abundantly.

    “Yet, right now, my focus is no longer solely on the title itself. Of course, it is undisputed: I emerged as the overall best in my set. But what matters most to me now is what to do with this achievement. I understand that this result does not automatically translate into immediate success or relief.

    “It is about continuing the same commitment, consistency, discipline, and hard work I invested in my first degree to ensure that it opens doors, creates opportunities, and allows me to make meaningful contributions both to my community and to the world as a historian.

    To the Younger Students

    Rhoda emphatically admonished younger students still in school that “education is not something to take lightly. It may be your right, your privilege, or your entitlement, but school is never a scam. As my loving parents, Mr. and Mrs. Adinoyi, always remind me that education is the key that can open doors you might never access otherwise. For me, education has the power to transform my story, uplift my family, and positively impact my community.”

    Rhoda tells every young person who cares to listen to the mantra that sustained her throughout her academic journey in PAAU: “You can not mess up. You must succeed. You will succeed. You can succeed. And you are going to succeed.”

    She concluded, “Believe it, live it, and let it guide you.”

     

    (Thompson C. Yamput is the State Correspondent of the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), Lokoja Office)

  • Black Sunday In Kano As Over 30 Killed In Road Accident

    Black Sunday In Kano As Over 30 Killed In Road Accident

     

     

    Tragedy struck Kano State on Sunday as more than 30 people reportedly lost their lives in a road accident at Kwanar Barde, Gezawa Local Government Area.

    The accident, which occurred in the early hours of Sunday morning, involved a trailer heading toward Gujungu that allegedly crashed due to reckless driving. Several passengers sustained serious injuries in the crash.

    Kano State Governor Abba Yusuf confirmed the incident in a statement by his spokesperson, Sanusi Bature, offering condolences to the families of the victims.

    The Governor directed the Kano State Ministry of Health to provide free and adequate medical care to all survivors admitted to hospitals. He also instructed the Office of the Special Adviser on Humanitarian Affairs to assess the casualties and implement support measures for the affected families.

    Describing the tragedy as heartbreaking, Governor Yusuf prayed for the speedy recovery of the injured and for the repose of the souls of those who died. He also cautioned motorists, particularly drivers of heavy-duty vehicles, to avoid reckless driving and strictly adhere to traffic regulations to prevent similar incidents in the future.

    As of the time of filing, the Kano command of the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) had not issued an official statement, and efforts to reach its spokesperson, Abdullahi Labaran, were unsuccessful.

    The accident has sent shockwaves across the state, highlighting ongoing concerns about road safety and traffic enforcement.

  • A PERSONAL LEGAL OPINION ON THE REMOVAL OF MANDATORY REAL-TIME ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION FROM THE ELECTORAL ACT (REPEAL & REENACTMENT) BILL, 2026. (PART 1)

    A PERSONAL LEGAL OPINION ON THE REMOVAL OF MANDATORY REAL-TIME ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION FROM THE ELECTORAL ACT (REPEAL & REENACTMENT) BILL, 2026. (PART 1)

     

    *A PERSONAL LEGAL OPINION

     

    By Sylvester Udemezue (Member, NBA’s Law Reform Committee)

    Regarding the controversy surrounding the alleged rejection of the express inclusion of mandatory real-time electronic transmission of election results in the draft Electoral Bill 2026, I have just reviewed a news report titled *“Electoral Act: Akpabio Admits, Defends Removal of ‘Real-Time’ from Bill”,* published by Tribune Online on 8 February 2026.

    In light of the Senate President’s clarification, it can now be said, without speculation, that we have heard directly from the horse’s mouth. The clarification by the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, confirms that the National Assembly deliberately removed the “real-time” electronic transmission requirement in order to preserve discretion for INEC and, by implication, to retain manual collation as the decisive stage of result declaration.

    The unavoidable implication of this position is stark: electronic transmission is no longer treated as an indispensable safeguard of electoral integrity, but as an optional, discretionary, and secondary mechanism: subordinate to manual Form EC8A and other physical election records. This position is deeply problematic, both legally and empirically.

    (1). *Electronic Transmission that Is Not Real-time and Polling-unit-based Is Functionally Useless*

    If electronic transmission will not occur from the polling unit, on election day, within the election timeframe, then there is little or no rational basis for approving electronic transmission at all. Transmission that occurs (a). after election officials have left polling units, (b) after manual collation has commenced, or (c). on a later date, is structurally incapable of preventing fraud.

    It merely digitizes an already-compromised process. As I have tried to demonstrate in a published work (Sylvester Udemezue, *’How Nigeria’s National Assembly Can Make the Electoral System Impregnable on Electronic Transmission to Prevent Fraud During Election Result Collation’,* International Journal for Public Policy, Law and Development, 2025 2(3). (India) <https://ijpld.com/ijpld/article/view/11> accessed on 08 February 2026, the polling unit is the only point in the electoral chain where results are still relatively insulated from human interference. Once Form EC8A leaves the polling unit, the integrity of the process collapses under the weight of human discretion, logistics, political pressure, and institutional opacity.

    (2). *The “Network Failure” Argument Is A Red Herring*

    The Senate President’s argument, that mandatory real-time transmission would prevent elections from holding in areas with poor network or grid failure, is conceptually flawed and empirically weak. Mandatory electronic transmission does not mean uniform technical conditions everywhere; it means uniform legal obligation. As shown in comparative electoral systems where electronic transmission is the order (India, Brazil, Estonia, and even parts of the United States), and as analysed in my article cited above, technical contingencies are anticipated and legislated for, not used as an excuse to abandon systemic safeguards.

    (3). *Technical Exceptions Can Be Legislated Without Destroying The Rule*

    Rather than reject mandatory electronic transmission, the Electoral Act can, and should, contain carefully designed contingency provisions, such as: (a). repeat polls where transmission is technically impossible, (b). supervised relocation of electoral officers (with party agents and security) to the nearest network-enabled area to ensure transmission. These solutions are extensively canvassed and illustrated with Draft Provisions in my said article and they reflect best practices in election-integrity engineering.

    (4). *Poor Network Or Grid Failure Is Not A Legally Defensible Ground For Rejecting Mandatory Transmission*

    Nigeria already conducts online banking, online BVN verification, online NIN enrolment, online real-time voter accreditation (BVAS), across the same terrain now cited as technologically unfit for elections. To suddenly invoke infrastructure weakness only at the collation stage of elections is neither honest nor persuasive. It reveals a preference for human discretion over technological constraint, which is precisely where electoral fraud thrives.

    (5). *Non-mandatory Electronic Transmission Serves No Material Purpose*

    There is no point whatsoever in providing for electronic transmission if it is not made mandatory. Electronic transmission that occurs (a). after results have been manually handled, (b). after forms have moved through multiple hands, or (c). after collation centres have already been engaged, does nothing to cure the original mischief. It becomes a ceremonial afterthought: *useful for public relations, but useless for integrity and credibility.*

    (6). *The Core Objective Of Electronic Transmission is to Neutralize Human Interference at the Collation Stage*

    As rigorously argued in my paper, cited above, the principal demand for mandatory real-time electronic transmission from polling units is to eliminate human interference with Form EC8A and allied materials after voting ends. Thus, any legal framework that delays transmission or permits discretionary timing, or allows results to be “cleaned up” before digital capture, defeats the very purpose of electoral reform.

    (7). *The Senate’s Justification Is Backward-looking And Systemically Dangerous*

    In light of the above, the Senate’s rejection of mandatory real-time electronic transmission is unfounded, unreasonable, inconsistent with global best practices, and dangerously backward-looking. A democracy that fears binding, automated, real-time transparency is one that still trusts human discretion over institutional safeguards, and that is the very architecture of electoral fraud.

    (8). *Bottomline:*

    If credible and transparent collation processes are to be achieved in general elections in Nigeria going forward, four requirements must be mandatory and non-negotiable regarding electronic transmission of results, and this my own understanding of “real-time” in the present circumstances:

    1. Electronic transmission must be expressly mandated by the parent Act: the Electoral Act

    2. The time of transmission must be clearly defined and made mandatory. As already explained above, electronic transmission is meaningless if results are sent the next day, after manipulation has already occurred.

    3. The place of transmission must be defined and made mandatory: the polling unit. Transmission from collation centres or INEC offices defeats the very purpose, as fraud or manipulation may already have taken place before the results get there.

    4. Any result not electronically transmitted in the manner prescribed by law must be automatically invalid, null. However, where excluding such results would materially affect the outcome, fresh elections must be conducted in the affected areas, with strict electronic transmission as a condition for validity.

    *CAVEAT:* The opinion above is my personal opinion. It’s not a partisan or group statement.

    *Further Reading On Why Strong Legal Framework Is essential to ensure credible elections in Nigeria*

    1. Sylvester Udemezue, *’How Nigeria’s National Assembly Can Make the Electoral System Impregnable on Electronic Transmission to Prevent Fraud During Election Result Collation’,* International Journal for Public Policy, Law and Development, 2025 2(3). (India) <https://ijpld.com/ijpld/article/view/11>.

    2. Sylvester Udemezue, ‘Amupitan: Nigeria’s Electoral Problem Lies Not in INEC Chairman’s Qualifications But in Weak and Manipulable Laws’ (TheNigeriaLawyer, 17 October 2025)

    3. Sylvester Udemezue, ‘Nigeria’s Backward Culture of Treating Symptoms, Ignoring Causes: The Burden of Proof Debate as a Mirror of Systemic Electoral Dysfunction’ (The Reality Ministry, 31 October 2025)

    (Respectfully,
    Sylvester Udemezue (Udems)
    Member, NBA’s Law Reform Committee.
    08109024556.
    udemsyl@gmail.com.
    (08 February 2026))

  • Judicial Independence and Financial Autonomy in Nigeria: A Critical Response to the Enugu Digital Court Project

    Judicial Independence and Financial Autonomy in Nigeria: A Critical Response to the Enugu Digital Court Project

     

     

    By Sylvester Udemezue

    I recently came across a news report titled *”‘Judicial Independence Must Be Effective, Not Just Formal’ — Gov. Mbah Commissions Enugu Digital Court Facility,”* in which it was reported that the Governor of Enugu State, His Excellency Peter Mbah, commissioned a newly built digital court facility.

    The project was presented as a major step toward modernising the judiciary and enhancing speedy justice delivery. According to the report, the Governor emphasised that judicial independence must be substantive rather than merely formal, highlighting technological integration and financial autonomy as critical to achieving this goal.

    The facility reportedly comprises several digitally equipped courtrooms intended to decongest courts and improve efficiency, while the Chief Judge of Enugu State expressed appreciation to the Governor for his support of judicial reforms.

    While the initiative may appear commendable at first glance, the report raises fundamental and unsettling questions about the true meaning and practical reality of judicial independence in Nigeria.

    1. First, why is the Enugu State Judiciary unable to build a digital court facility for itself? Why must such an essential judicial infrastructure project originate from, and be executed by, the Executive arm of government?

    2. Second, why must the Governor personally “commission” a judicial facility? Why could the Chief Judge of Enugu State (who constitutionally heads the judiciary in the state) not be the one to initiate, complete, and, if necessary, commission such a project? Indeed, must a judicial facility await ceremonial commissioning by the Executive before it can be put to use, or would the heavens fall if the courts simply commenced operations once the facility was completed?

    These questions go to the heart of the matter. Against this background, one must ask whether the Governor was truly serious when he declared that judicial independence and financial autonomy must be effective and not merely formal. With due respect, it is difficult to reconcile that statement with the reality it seeks to describe. A judiciary that depends on the Executive for court buildings, digital infrastructure, judges’ residences, official vehicles, and even basic operational facilities cannot, by any meaningful standard, be said to be independent. Financial dependence inevitably breeds institutional vulnerability. In this context, the age-old principle remains relevant: he who pays the piper dictates the tune. Judicial independence cannot thrive where the Executive plays the role of benefactor and provider for the judiciary. The contradiction is stark and unavoidable.

    There is absolutely no reason why the judiciary should not have comprehensive annual budgetary provisions covering all its recurrent, operational and capital needs. Judicial leaders, like their counterparts in the Executive and the Legislature, should prepare and submit their budget proposals for inclusion in the annual appropriation process and thereafter appear before the appropriate legislative bodies to defend those budgets. Once duly passed and signed into law, funds should be released directly to the judiciary from the appropriate pool accounts (whether the Federation Account or the relevant state accounts) enabling the judiciary to independently procure what it needs, including court infrastructure, digital facilities, housing for judicial officers, vehicles, ICT systems, and other logistical and institutional upgrades. There is no justification for the Executive to continue procuring facilities and amenities for the judiciary as though the judiciary were a department or agency under executive control.

    As a constitutionally recognised and co-equal arm of government, the judiciary ought to function independently, just as the Executive and the Legislature function independently of one another.

    Notably, it is difficult to recall any instance where judges or legislators purchase or donate houses, vehicles, or facilities to the Executive arm of government. This is so only because the Executive is already self-sustaining, having made adequate budgetary provisions for itself in the annual budget. The judiciary must likewise be self-sustaining if it is to secure and safeguard its independence. If, across all levels and jurisdictions in Nigeria, the leadership of the judiciary cannot from its own budget procure vehicles for judges and magistrates, cannot provide critical facilities for itself, and cannot even construct official quarters for its own staff, then some troubling questions arise:

    1. What has become of the judiciary’s official budget as an independent arm of government?

    2. Are there no appropriations for capital projects such as residential housing for judges, development of digital court facilities, vehicles and other critical infrastructure?

    3. Or has the Nigerian judiciary ceased to function as the third and independent arm of government and instead become an appendage of the Executive, so much so that the Executive now builds houses and is responsible for installing other facilities for judges or for the Judiciary?

    4. Has the judiciary become so emasculated and constrained that its leaders are either unwilling or unable to demand, defend, and secure adequate financial provisions for essential capital projects through the judiciary’s own annual budgetary process?

    Until these questions are honestly confronted and structurally resolved, declarations about “effective judicial independence” will remain aspirational rhetoric rather than lived institutional reality.

    (Respectfullly,
    Sylvester Udemezue (udems)
    08109024556.
    lawmentorng@gmail.com.)

  • Ashiru advocates ministry of religious affairs to promote harmony

    Ashiru advocates ministry of religious affairs to promote harmony

    Ashiru advocates ministry of religious affairs to promote harmony

     

    By Afusat Agunbiade-Oladipo

     

    The Senator representing Kwara South Senatorial District, Arch. Lola Ashiru, has called for the establishment of a Ministry of Religious Affairs at the state level to promote harmony, peace and ethical values among Nigerians.

    Ashiru made the call on Saturday during a courtesy visit by the Kwara Chapter of the Executive Members of the Correspondence Chapel of Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), in Offa where he reflected on the role of religion in society and the need for government involvement in guiding religious practice.

    According to him, the fundamental purpose of religion is to foster peace, love, equity and harmony among people, noting that religion is meant to serve humanity and not the other way round.

    “Religion is supposed to bring harmony among people. The essence of worship is not because God needs our praise, but because religion is meant to shape our values, our conduct and our relationship with one another,” he said.

    The Senator expressed concern over what he described as the monetisation and commercialisation of religion, which he said had begun to undermine its positive impact on society.

    He observed that religious activities and doctrines dominate daily life in Nigeria, with churches and mosques attracting large followings, especially on Fridays and Sundays, stressing that such influence makes it important for government to pay closer attention to religious practice.

    Ashiru said government support for religious organisations should go beyond physical assistance to include intellectual guidance and policy direction to ensure that religious teachings promote peace and development.

    “It is important for government to give direction to religious teachings so that religion can truly play its role in developing the people and promoting harmony,” he said.

    He argued that a Ministry of Religious Affairs would be more impactful than some existing institutions, including ministries overseeing chieftaincy affairs, given the central role religion plays in the lives of citizens.

    According to him, such a ministry would help regulate religious activities, encourage interfaith harmony and reduce negative practices associated with religious extremism and exploitation.

    Ashiru added that deliberate government engagement with religious leaders and institutions would contribute significantly to social stability and peaceful coexistence in the country.

  • Nigeria’s South East Development Commission and Political Extortion

    Nigeria’s South East Development Commission and Political Extortion

     

     

    *By Chidi Anselm Odinkalu

    When he presented his budget proposals for 2024 to Nigeria’s National Assembly, the first full year of appropriations under his presidency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu identified human asset development, poverty reduction and fighting insecurity as priorities. Last week, his official spokesperson, Bayo Onanuga, appeared to forget or renounce that policy direction when he acknowledged that 133 million Nigerians were multi-dimensionally poor but claimed that had nothing to do with the Federal Government. According to Mr Onanuga, the states and local governments were responsible for that.

    On the same day, 450 kilometres away, Vice-President Kashim Shettima provided a full rebuttal of Mr Onanuga’s escape into sovereign abdication. The occasion was the launch of the Stakeholder consultation of the South East Development Commission (SEDC) for its regional development plan called Southeast Vision 2050 (SEV2050). At the event, the Vice-President went beyond merely reaffirming the leadership and responsibility of the Federal Government in eliminating poverty. He also underscored that this had to be “inclusive, sustainable, and anchored on peace and productivity.”

    This was not an unveiling of the SEV2050. Rather, it kicked off the process to evolve one. It was also the promenade of the SEDC.

    The Commission is one of the four regional development commissions established by President Tinubu under the Ministry of Regional Development. The others are in the north-central, north-west, and south-west. Preceding these, the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) has been in existence since 2000, and the North-East Development Commission (NEDC) since 2017.

    The Stakeholder consultation in Enugu was a credit to the SEDC Board, chaired by Emega Wogu, and the management led by the Managing Director, Mark Okoye. It was clearly a pitch for political support and constituency building for the Commission. The SEDC achieved a significant feat by lining up the public support of the governors of all five south-eastern states. By contrast, when its north-west counterpart organised a similar event last month, none of the seven governors of the zone attended.

    Imo State Governor, Hope Uzodinma, coincidentally the Chair of the South-East Governors Forum, was the only one of the five governors who did not attend in person. He sent the Speaker of the Imo State House of Assembly instead. It appears the SEDC will not be short of goodwill as it sets out on its mission. Quite clearly, it will not be short of human obstacles in its path.

    As its primary mission, the SEDC Act of 2024 charges the Commission with responsibility to “receive and manage funds from allocations of the Federation Account for the reconstruction and rehabilitation of roads, houses and other infrastructural damages suffered by the region as a result of the effect of the Civil War….” The SEDC is the only regional development commission with an explicit mission of post-war reconstruction. One question that the consultation put before the Commission was: reconstruction from which war?

    Anambra State Governor, Chukwuma Soludo, addressed this question in his remarks, arguing that the region was in recovery from not one war but “two major wars”. One was the Nigeria-Biafra war, which was supposed to have officially ended on 15th January 1970. The second was what he called “an internal war of self-destruction that has been on since 2021.” Some people may argue that his dating of this second conflict to 2021 is either artificial or unrealistically recent.

    It was notable that Governor Soludo failed to mention the parties to this second war. Pointedly, however, he noted that “after the (first) civil war, there was a promise of rehabilitation and reconstruction; and…. this is yet to happen.” What he left unsaid was that the failure to fulfill that promise made what he described as the second war all but inevitable. Whether that was deliberate or inadvertent is immaterial.

    Even as it sought to project an ambition over the next quarter-century, the SEV2050 consultation could not escape the enduring backdrop of reconstruction that frames its search for a mission. The mistake will be to focus on brick and mortar and forget to prioritise a reconstruction of minds, memories, and mentalities.

    Vice-President Shettima acknowledged as much with some deftness in his opening remarks when he paid tribute to “a region defined not only by memory, but by motion.” Like Governor Soludo, what he left unsaid was even more eloquent. It was impossible to miss that he felt unable to say that this motion led to movement or progress.

    How to transform motion into movement and ultimately to regional progress, more than half a century after the end of the conflict that continues to define independent Nigeria, is what the SEDC seeks
    .
    On show were early signs of constructive competition among the states of the Southeast. It begs to be harnessed.

    Abia State offers a vision for energy transition to inspire value-added processing and industry.

    Anambra State is willing to lead in enterprise and innovation.

    Ebonyi State’s value offer is in the food security and agriculture value chain.

    Enugu State offers a secure home for a shared mission of coordination for regional prosperity.

    These are reassuring. But the Enugu event equally advertised the daunting challenges that confront the Commission along its path. Three were evident.

    One is a crisis of mismatched expectations. This was best illustrated by Governor Soludo. Having advised the Commission to be realistic in its ambitions, he nevertheless urged the Commission to lead the delivery of a “Marshall Plan” for the South-east, a reference to the US-led plan for Europe’s reconstruction after World War II.  According to Governor Soludo, this regional Marshall Plan should include a regional security framework, and “super inter-state infrastructure” such as regional railways and regional highways. The problem, however, is that an SEDC that purports to lead on the former is likely to antagonise the state governors, and a Commission that claims to lead on the latter will be on a fool’s errand.

    Two is the problem of evolving a viable business model for the SEDC. For long, the NDDC has defined the business model of the regional development commissions. Under this model, the commissions operate largely as front offices for extortion, which holds the fate of citizens of the affected region/s hostage in carve-ups by political insiders sharing development funds as private loot. By 2022, according to one report on the NDDC, “12,000 out of 13,377 projects were abandoned after paying trillions of Naira for them.” As development agents, they have been largely ineffectual. The SEDC can’t afford this.

    Three, therefore, SEDC will face push-back from the usual species of greedy political grubbiness. The event in Enugu had in attendance the Vice-President, the Governors of all the South-east States, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, who was represented by the Majority Leader, Prof. Julius Ihonvbere. But it was impossible not to notice the absence of the Chairman of the SEDC Committee in the Senate and former Governor of Abia State, Orji Uzor Kalu; his counterpart in the House of Representatives, Chris Nkwonta; and the man who refers to himself as “Number Six Citizen”, Deputy Speaker, Benjamin Kalu. Senator Orji Kalu reportedly sent one of his daughters to represent him. She holds no relevant public office. Anyone who thinks the near collective absence of the National Assembly caucus of the region was a coincidence misunderstands how the place works.

    The SEV2050 event in Enugu was arguably as successful as its planners could have hoped for. In terms of its symbolism and optics, it may have exceeded expectations. The SEDC  will not be short of ideas as it goes forward; nor will it be short of determined antagonists.

    Post-war reconstruction is an existential undertaking. The SEDC has neither the budget nor the latitude for the errors that have become the NDDC habits. If the Commission can confine its mission and secure protection against baleful political extortion from predictable sources, it may lay durable foundations under its current leadership for a business model suited to its unique and historic mission.

    *A lawyer and a teacher, Odinkalu can be reached at chidi.odinkalu@tufts.edu*

  • CAS ENGAGES FORMER AIR CHIEF AMOSU, REINFORCES CONTINUITY OF LEADERSHIP

    By Flowerbudnews

    As part of his operational visit to Lagos, the Chief of the Air Staff (CAS), Air Marshal Sunday Kelvin Aneke, paid a courtesy call on former Chief of the Air Staff, Air Marshal Adesola Nunayon Amosu, in a symbolic engagement that highlighted the Nigerian Air Force’s culture of institutional memory and respect for past leadership.

    The visit served as a platform for reflection on the Service’s evolution and an opportunity for the CAS to draw from the former Air Chief’s wealth of operational and strategic experience.

     

    Air Marshal Aneke emphasized that sustained airpower development is strengthened by maintaining close ties with past leaders whose contributions continue to shape doctrine, professionalism, and long-term vision within the Nigerian Air Force.

    #NigerianAirForce #LeadershipContinuity #InstitutionalLegacy #AirPower #NAF

  • Ex Senate President Mark, making exaggerated claims to deflect attention from global acclaim of Tinubu’s economic reforms – TDF

     

     

    The Democratic Front (TDF) has condemned what it described as a desperate attempt by the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), David Mark, to deflect attention from the current global acclaim of the economic reforms of the President Bola Tinubu administration.

    In a statement signed by its Chairman Mallam Danjuma Muhammad and Secretary, Chief Wale Adedayo, the group argued that the former Senate President was exaggerating negative narratives about poverty in Nigeria.

    The statement reads in part: “It is rather unbelievable that David Mark who presided over the Nigerian Senate between 2007 and 2015, under a government that had the good fortune of pumping 2.3 million barrels of crude per day and consistently sold at over $100 per barrel, and yet was unable to guarantee workers’ salaries at federal and state level, will dismiss the economic milestones achieved by the current administration.

    “For the avoidance of doubt, the President Tinubu-led administration did not have the benefit of the massive crude the then Federal Government had but has since embarked on socio-economic re-engineering that has increased growth and productivity, mitigated inflationary trend from 34% to 15%, boosted external reserves beyond the $46 billion mark, and doubled the federation’s revenue in less than three years.

    “We want to remind the former Senate President that his stint as head of the national assembly was the most uneventful in the history of infrastructural development in the country.

    “So much money was earned from the sale of crude oil for six consecutive years, but the country was left without any capital infrastructural project worth N50 billion in any part of Nigeria.

    “It was the failure by David Mark and his colleagues in the successive governments of PDP to put multi-billion petro dollars into appropriate use for the Nigerian people, that laid the foundation for poverty in the land which ballooned to 60.9% as of 2010, not President Tinubu’s reforms, as alleged by the ADC National Chairman.

    “History will also remember him as the Minister of Communication, who stirred national uproar in 1988, by asserting that telephones and telecommunications services are not for the poor.

    “We find it interesting and also Ironic that the same David Mark has suddenly become an advocate of the poor, out of a desperate bid to further personal political gains and advantages.

    “From every indication, the opposition African Democratic Congress is overwhelmed and intimidated by the rise in the positive outcome of ongoing economic reforms under the watch of the All Progressives Congress APC-led administration.

    “We acknowledged that the global acclaim of President Tinubu’s reforms is too loud to be ignored by the Nigerian electorate, and this has largely unsettled the opposition, whose defeat in the 2027 elections is imminent.

    “The ADC National Chairman and his party members should know that spinning negative narratives to minimise President Tinubu’s record of performance at this point, will not help their party.

    “This is because Nigerians are appreciating the significant reduction in inflation, facilitation of access to funding university education for millions of indigent students through NELFUND, and the emergence of sustainable trade and employment opportunities created in Agriculture, Solid Minerals, and other non-oil sectors of the economy.

    “Other areas of interest to the people also include; the stability in exchange rate, the elimination of arbitrage and round tripping of foreign exchange, and the huge accruals in national revenue for the overall development and security of the nation.”

    The group added that the success of the Tinubu reforms is of utmost importance to the people than the petty politics of David Mark and his allies