Month: October 2023

  • Court stops Senate’s award of N18.4bn compensation for 34 Rivers oil communities

    Court stops Senate’s award of N18.4bn compensation for 34 Rivers oil communities

     

    Abuja: A Federal High Court, Abuja, on Wednesday, declared that the Senate acted illegally in awarding N18.4 billion as compensation to 34 oil producing communities of Obiafu, Soku to Bonny in Rivers over Nigeria NLG Ltd’s acquisition of right of way (ROW).

    Justice Inyang Ekwo, in a judgment held that the plaintiff, Nigeria LNG Ltd, had successfully demonstrated that the defendants acted ultra vires and its case succeeded on merit.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the Senate had, in a resolution dated Oct 4, 2022, mandated the LNG to pay the 34 communities within 60 days, following a petition submitted on behalf of 73 communities of Obiafu, Soku to Bonny in Rivers, seeking compensation for acquisition of right of way by the company.

    The lawmakers, after the their investigation through the Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions, resolved that 34 communities out of the 74 were yet to be compensated, thereby, directing the firm to do the needful within 60 days.

    But the LNG Ltd, through its counsel, Prof Bayo Adaralegbe in an amended originating summons dated Feb. 13, sued the Senate, Senate President, National Assembly (NASS) and Mr Michael Ajileye as 1st to 4th defendants respectively.
    In the application marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1989/2023, the plaintiff sought six questions for determination.
    These include “whether by the provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), Section 19 of the Oil Pipelines Act and all other relevant legislation, the 1st defendant or any of its committees, agencies or members have the powers to entertain, act on and or deal with legal claims, and or adjudicate or determine a legal right created under the Act relating to compensation for petroleum or any other activities, or any other law based on a petition submitted against the plaintiff on behalf of 73 communities of Obiafu, Soku to Bonny, in Rivers State?
    “Whether the 1st defendant or any of its committees, agencies or members have the judicial powers under the 1999 Constitution or any other law to award or grant reliefs of a monetary nature in favour of persons or communities as compensation or damages in respect of legal rights and legal claims created under the Oil Pipelines Act that also mandatorily stipulates the court of law as a remedial process for compensation in respect of the violation of such legal rights?
    “Whether the 1st defendant’s resolution dated 4th October, 2022, mandating the plaintiff to pay 34 communities and other individuals in Rivers State the sum of N18,374,199,727.00 (Eighteen Billion, Three Hundred and Seventy-Four Million, One Hundred and Ninety-Nine Thousand, Seven Hundred and Twenty Seven Naira) within a period of 60 days is constitutional, legal, lawful, valid, binding, and has any legal effect or force of law? ” among others.
    The Senate, in its counter affidavit, argued that over the years and due to improved constitutional practices, the legislature had been conferred by law and global constitutional practices with oversight functions allied and connected to their statutory duty of law making.
    It said that citizens and non-citizens of the country had the liberty to approach the upper chambers via petitions or public hearings for any constitutional issues or issues bothering on civil rights, security of the country, welfare of citizens and governance in general.
    Other defendants also disagreed with the company, urging the court to dismiss the suit.
    Delivering the judgment, Justice Ekwo answered the questions posed in favour of the company.
    The judge said that though Section 4(2) of the 1999 Constitution provided that the NASS shall have powers to make laws for the peace, order and good government of the country, Section 6(6)(a) and (b) vested judicial powers in the court.
    “The National Assembly in the exercise of the powers given to it by Section 88 (1) of the Constitution must observe the doctrine of separation of powers and the rule of law.
    “There are consequences where any other arm of government attempts to exercise the powers given to the judiciary by any guise,” he said.
    Justice Ekwo, therefore, declared that by the provisions of the 1999 Constitution, the Senate and its Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions and other committees were not empowered by law to compensate or pass any binding verdict or decision, resolution, arising from the petition.

    The judge gave an order of perpetual injunction, restraining the defendants from further inviting, summoning, or issuing warrants of arrest against the company, its officers and or staff in respect of the petition or give legal effect to the resolution dated 4th October, 2022.

    He equally gave an order of perpetual injunction, restraining any individual, family or member of the 73 communities individually or collectively, either through self-help or any other person acting for or through them, including law enforcement agencies from enforcing the Senate resolution dated 4th October, 2022

    “This shall be the order of this court,” the judge declared.(NAN)(www.nannews.ng) / Flowerbudnews

  • Sylva’s lawyer writes INEC, seeks withdrawal of amended candidates’ list

    Sylva’s lawyer writes INEC, seeks withdrawal of amended candidates’ list

     

    Abuja: Mr Ahmed Raji, SAN, has written to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), demanding immediate withdrawal of the amended list of candidates released for the poll.

    Raji, who is counsel to Chief Timipre Sylva, the All Progressives Congress (APC)’s candidate in the Nov. 11 Bayelsa election, described the decision of the electoral umpire as prejudicial.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that INEC had, earlier today, released amended list of candidates vying in the election without including Sylva’s name.

    Justice Donatus Okorowo of a Federal High Court, Abuja, had, on Oct. 9 in a judgment , disqualified Sylva, a former governor of the state, from contesting the election.

    Unsatisfied with the judgment, Sylva approached the Court of Appeal, through his lawyer, Raji, to challenge the decision of the court.

    But while the appeal is pending, INEC released list of candidates for the poll excluding the APC candidate’s names.

    In a letter to the commission dated Oct. 25, Raji said he had the firm instruction of Sylva to respectfully demand for the immediate withdrawal of the amended list.

    The senior lawyer said it was shocking for the INEC to release such publication when the judgement the commission acted upon had already been appealed against at the Court of Appeal. .

    “Dear sir, you will recall that the judgment in issue, that arose from the above suit was delivered on the 9th October,2023 and our client, being an ardent and firm believer in the efficacy of the judiciary and the rule of law, immediately filed an appeal within 24 hours of the judgment, on the 10th October, 2023.

    “In addition to the notice of appeal, our client expeditiously compiled the record of appeal and transmitted same in less than 10 days.
    “The appeal was successfully entered on the 18th October, 2023, with Appeal No. CA/ABJ/CS/1060/2023.
    “The above being the case, the commission, as a respected arbiter and law abiding institution, is expected to respectfully wait for the outcome of the appeal, before taking any step that may be prejudicial to any of the parties, particularly, our client.
    “This is in view of the fact that the parties that went to court are not candidate in the forthcoming election, unlike our client. In other words, they do not have anything to lose, rather, they are fighting proxy battles to deny our client and his party the opportunity to participate in the forthcoming election.
    “We know that the Commission has always been consistent in a matter like this, to wait until the entire appellate process and proceedings are completed, one way or the other,” he said.
    According to him, this is not only consistent with the administrative and policy convenience but also with the Electoral Act and the constitution, in all election related matters.
    NAN reports that the Court of Appeal in Abuja, has scheduled hearing for Friday in the appeal filed by Slyva.Sylva and APC are, by their suits, praying the Court of Appeal to set aside the Oct. 9 judgment by Justice Okorowo , voiding Sylva’s candidacy.
    Sylva, in his three-ground notice of appeal, is contending among others that the trial court erred in law and and occasioned a grave miscarriage of justice when it wrongly assumed jurisdiction by delving into the internal affairs of his party, which is a non-justiciable cause of action

    He stated that the trial court has a duty to understand the case presented by the parties and apply the law correctly.

    Sylva contended that the trial judge erred in law and occasioned a grave miscarriage of justice against him when he (the judge) wrongly conferred, allowed and adjudicated on the matter when the respondent (plaintiff at the trial court) has no locus standi to initiate or institute the action.

    He argued that the plaintiff had agreed that he did not participate in the primary election that produced him as the governorship candidate of the APC.

    Sylva also argued that the trial court breached his right to fair hearing as guaranteed by the Constitution when it failed to properly evaluate, determine and pronounce on his notice of preliminary objection, with which he challenged the competence of the suit.(NAN)(www.nannews.ng) (Flowerbudnews)

  • Group lauds Gov. Soludo for taking bold step to end touting

    Group lauds Gov. Soludo for taking bold step to end touting

     

    By Flowerbudnews

    Enugu: The Civil Liberties Organization (CLO), on Wednesday, lauded Gov. Chukwuma Soludo for inaugurating and empowering Special Anti-Touting Squad to end touting and its related misbehaviours in Anambra.

    “This is welcome development and bold step in the right direction towards eliminating devilish and insensate touting and their sponsors that has taken over all nooks and crannies of the state,” Chairman of CLO, Anambra, Mr Vincent Ezekwueme, said.

    Ezekwueme told newsmen in Enugu that touts’ barbaric and despicable acts had scared customers and visitors to the state; thereby, jeopardising economic activities in the state for some time now.

    He recalled how illegal and illegitimate revenue agents, touts and unauthorised emblem boys had been molesting, extorting, exploiting and intimidating residents, traders, visitors with reckless abandon.

    According to him, previously, Anambra State residents lived in fear as if we are in a state of nature in which life will be brutish, nasty and short.

    He said: “We recall with regrets how a nursing mother of about six-months-old baby hawking face masks at Williams Street near Main Market, Onitsha was brutalised by morally bankrupt illegal revenue agents.

    “It was through my intervention and other public-spirited individuals that the woman was saved.

    “She lamented that she made a sales of N300 and the illegal revenue agents has collected N500 and still demanding more money from her, which she resisted which necessitated her molestation.”

    The chairman, however, said that the much cherished Special Anti- Touting Squad would be a mirage and relentless efforts if government failed to constitute “Monitoring the Monitors Committee”.

     

    “The committee should be saddled with the responsibility of ensuring that the Special Anti- Touting Squad operates in tandem with mandate giving to them by His Excellency, Gov. Chukwuma Soludo.

    “They should be properly and adequately trained, equipped, cautioned and advised to toe the path of civility, decorum, constitutionality, rule of law and respect for fundamental human rights of citizens.

     

    “They should be patriotic, humane, selfless and civil in discharging their duties as their conducts will be use to assess the government,” he added. (Flowerbudnews)

  • Varsity suspends examination as robbers attacked and raped students

    Varsity suspends examination as robbers attacked and raped students

    Tai Solarin University of Education (TASUED), Ogun, has suspended on-going second semester examinations following Tuesday’s robbery and rape of four female students.

     

    Suspected armed robbers invaded private female hostels of the school in the early hours of Tuesday, dispossessed the occupants of their valuables and allegedly raped four students.

     

    The suspension of the examination is contained in a statement issued on Wednesday by TASUED’s Registrar, Mr Dapo Oke, and released in Abeokuta.

     

    Oke explained that the institution’s security unit swung into action immediately it got wind of Tuesday’s unfortunate incident which took place at about 2 a.m.

     

    “The university condemns in strong terms incessant attacks on students, particularly the dimension of rape.

     

    “The university assures students, parents and guardians of its efforts in conjunction with the state government and security agencies to ensure that the welfare and security of students remain a priority,’’ Oke stated.

     

    The students’ community had been under siege by armed robbers in the past week.

     

    A student who pleaded anonymity noted that robbery incidents had been recurring in the Abapawa community of Ijegun where many of the students live.

     

    She alleged that robbers also invaded a hostel of 22 rooms few weeks back.

  • Policemen collecting N100 is embarrassing — Force PRO

    Policemen collecting N100 is embarrassing — Force PRO

    Nigerian Police Force Spokesperson, CSP Olumuyiwa Adejobi, has said it’s embarrassing that some policemen collect N100 or any amount from Nigerians, stating that it’s pure corruption and does not portray the force in a good light.

     

    Adejobi made it known while responding to a question from an X user on why some policemen extort road users

    .His words: “It’s pure corruption. It’s not allowed or acceptable. It’s condemned in its totality. 100 naira or whatever amount being collected by some policemen (not all of them) on the road is embarrassing and does not portray police in a good light.

    In fact, the hatred and bad image of the police are tailored to this and some other isolated misconducts. Those you see on the road collecting dirty money do not represent our standards, values, and vision. It’s a matter of time. They will soon meet their Waterloo.

     

    He also stated that the IGP has set up a committee to tackle unprofessionalism in the force.

     

    “The IGP detests that and is working assiduously to tackle corruption, misconducts and unprofessionalism in the police. We will soon reveal the outcomes of IGP’s monitoring team’s operations across the country. We have recorded successes in that regard, and it’s a continuous exercise

     

     

     

  • Senate moves to amend Cybercrimes Act, 2015

    Senate moves to amend Cybercrimes Act, 2015

    seeks to correct errors, empower NSA to monitor compliance

     

    A bill seeking to amend the Cyber Crimes Act, of 2015, has passed second reading in the Senate.

    The bill titled: “A bill to amend the Cyber Crimes Act, 2015 and for Matters Connected Therewith, 2023, sponsored by Senator Shehu Buba (PDP, Bauchi), is seeking to among other things, correct errors contained in the principal act and empower the National Security Adviser(NSA), to monitor compliance with provisions of the Act.

    The bill titled: “A bill to amend the Cyber Crimes Act, 2015 and for Matters Connected Therewith, 2023, sponsored by Senator Shehu Buba (PDP, Bauchi), is seeking to among other things, correct errors contained in the principal act and empower the National Security Adviser(NSA), to monitor compliance with provisions of the Act.

    It was read for the first time on Wednesday, 18 October, 2023.

     

    Leading the debate on the proposed amendments during Wednesday’s plenary, the sponsor of the bill, Shehu Buba, said the proposed amendment was designed to remove encumbrances to the proper implementation of provisions of the Act.

     

    Buba said, “This Bill seeks to amend Section 44 as well as the long title to insert some consequential omissions from the act.

     

    “The digital and information technology age has created new avenues and tools for committing traditional crimes and new forms of crimes.

     

    “The architecture of the digital world challenges law enforcement institutions and the criminal justice system to device measures and procedures to contend with digital or cybercrimes.

     

    “ In Nigeria, there had overtime been a significant increase in internet-based advance fee fraud.

     

    “There are cases of hacking into emails, websites and infringement on privacy rights of persons and institutions which call for an urgent solution.

    “Legislation on advance fee fraud is among the earliest interventions by the Nigerian Government on cybercrimes, but the law is inadequate to meet the intricacies of technological development.

    He further said, “The most recent statute on cybercrimes in Nigeria is the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention etc.) Act, 2015.

     

    “The vaunted objectives of this Act include the provision of an effective and unified Legal, regulatory and institutional framework for the prohibition, prevention, detection, prosecution and punishment of cybercrimes in Nigeria.

     

    “The Act is designed to ensure the protection of critical national information infrastructure and to promote cyber security, protect computer systems and networks, electronic communications, data and computer programs, intellectual property and privacy rights.

     

    “This Bill seeks to address all anomalies that has hindered the effective implementation of the Act. Over the years, since the enactment of the Cybercrime Prohibition, Prevention etc.) Act 2015, there has not been compliance with the provision of Section 44(2) (a) of the acts

     

    That the noncompliance may not be unconnected with the ambiguity associated with the wordings of the said subsection in that the figure 0.005 does not reflect the true intendment of the draftsmen.

     

    “The true intendment is for the figure to read 0.5% (i.e half percent) of all electronic transactions value by the businesses specified in the Second Schedule of this Act and does not carry with it percentage sign neither has it any provision that will compel compliance or sanctions provision on defaulting parties in the event of noncompliance.

     

    “It is with this amendment that the businesses specified in the second schedule to this Act will enable the complying party’s credit the Fund with that which is the intendment of the draftsmen under Section (1) of Section 44 of this Act.

     

    “Equally, there has not been any ‘Compliance Monitoring System” in Sub section 6(a) of the Section 44 of the Act.

     

    “The National Security Adviser will ensure Compliance Monitoring System in making credit to the Fund by the specified businesses in the second Schedule.

    Similarly Mr. President, Distinguished Colleagues, is the slight amendment of the long title by Changing Cybercrime Prohibition to Cyber security.

     

    “Realigning legislative efforts with the objectives of the current National “Security Strategy 2019.

     

    The national strategy has expressly defined and embedded Cyber security as one of the major components of a comprehensive.

     

    “National Security Architecture to help safeguard, protect, defend national economic, political, and security infrastructures, advance national digital well-being, and to deter and react with both defensive and offensive capabilities cyberspace.

     

    “Realigning with National Cybersecurity Policy and Strategy on Nigeria Cyber Threat Profile – over 7 major cyber threats are classified as being inimical to national security and economy.

    Cybercrime is just one of them, not the main threat. Other classified are Cyber Terrorism & Terrorist Use of the Internet child online use and exploitation, online gender exploitation, elections interference, espionage, advanced persistent threats, and wide-scale digital economic infrastructure weakness and vulnerabilities among others.”

     

    The legislator explained that the current title of the bill does not reflect this reality as well as all other major threats.

     

    According to him, “Using CYBERSECURITY & RELATED MATTERS as the title of the bill reflects, communicates, and motivates the nation’s overall intent comprehensively.

     

    ”I therefore appeal for your support for the passage of this Bill”.

     

    He appealed for the support of his colleagues to enable the bill to undergo further legislative action

    Cybercrime is just one of them, not the main threat. Other classified are Cyber Terrorism & Terrorist Use of the Internet child online use and exploitation, online gender exploitation, elections interference, espionage, advanced persistent threats, and wide-scale digital economic infrastructure weakness and vulnerabilities among others.”

    The legislator explained that the current title of the bill does not reflect this reality as well as all other major threats.

    According to him, “Using CYBERSECURITY & RELATED MATTERS as the title of the bill reflects, communicates, and motivates the nation’s overall intent comprehensively.

    ”I therefore appeal for your support for the passage of this Bill”.

    He appealed for the support of his colleagues to enable the bill to undergo further legislative action

    After taking the constrictions of his colleagues, Deputy President of the Senate, Barau Jibrin, sought and received the approval of his colleagues to refer the bill to the Committee on National Intelligence and Security.

  • FRIN shutdown as EFCC, students clash in Ibadan

    FRIN shutdown as EFCC, students clash in Ibadan

    The Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria (FRIN), Ibadan, has been shut down indefinitely following the clash between the operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the students over an alleged invasion

     

    The EFCC accused students of holding seven of its officials hostage while on official assignment on campus.

     

    However, the students insisted that the operatives invaded their campus without recourse to protocol.

    Also, it was alleged that there were sporadic gunshots, which forced the students to scamper for safety.

     

    It was reported that two of the students were injured during the reported invasion.

     

    This development, as reliably informed, forced the students to stage peaceful protests in demand for justice.

     

     

     

    All the entrances leading to the campus were barricaded on the first day (Tuesday), while they took to the street on Wednesday.

     

    But the EFCC, in an official statement signed by Head of Media and Publicity, Dele Oyewale, said the reported incident was the other way around, as it alleged the students were holding seven of its men hostage.

    The officers, as contained in the statement, were held hostage while on routine verification exercises.

     

    The statement read, ‘The operatives of the Ibadan Zonal Command of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on routine verification exercise of a surety: Azeez Kazeem Oluwakemi were, on Tuesday, October 24, 2023, attacked and held hostage by staff and students of the Federal College of Forestry, Idi-shin Estate, Ibadan, Oyo State.

     

    “The operatives were in the college to authenticate the address and identity of Oluwakemi, who stood as a surety for Alakinde Khalid Kolawole, a suspected internet fraudster in the custody of the Commission. A surety verification exercise is a standard law enforcement practice for ensuring the bail conditions of a suspect.

    This fact occasioned the mission of EFCC’s operatives at the college.

     

    “For some inscrutable reasons, students and staff of the college went on a frenzy of attacks against operatives of the EFCC who were on an authorised assignment.

     

    “This is in spite of the fact that the college community was duly informed about the mission of the EFCC’s team.

     

    “The college’s Student Union President, in concert with his colleagues and some staff of the institution, reportedly ignited violent confrontations with operatives of the EFCC.

     

    Two main entrance gates to the college were barricaded with a car believed to be owned by one of the lecturers.

    The bus that conveyed operatives to the college was vandalised, even as students and staff of the college threw stones and dangerous objects at the vehicle.

     

    A rescue team that came successfully released the seven operatives held hostage by the riotous crowd.

     

    “It is noteworthy that operatives of the Commission exercised restraint in the face of the unprovoked attack and refrained from applying any force against the belligerent attackers. No student or staff of the college was shot, as armed operatives merely fired into the air to disperse the unruly crowd.

     

    “The Commission wishes to assure the public that it will continue to perform its duties in line with its mandate, and unprovoked attacks against personnel of the Commission will no longer be tolerated.

     

    Meanwhile, the Public Relations Officer of the Institute, Mr Kehinde Olawale, informed that the Institute has been shut as a result of the incident

     

    According to him, the school has been closed to ease tension. We have gone to the Oyo Police Command to lodge a complaint.

     

    We have sent a circular to the students. What we have decided to do now is close down the school

     

    We don’t want to see any students on the campus for now. This is done to douse the tension.

  • Tinubu appoints new RECs for Lagos, Rivers, seven others

    Tinubu appoints new RECs for Lagos, Rivers, seven others

    President Bola Tinubu on Wednesday appointed nine new Resident Electoral Commissioners for the Independent National Electoral Commission for a term of five years each, subject to the confirmation by the Senate.

    The Special Adviser to the President on Media and Publicity, Ajuri Ngelale, disclosed this in a statement titled ‘President Tinubu appoints nine INEC resident electoral commissioners.’⁣

    They include Mr. Isah Ehimeakne (Edo State), Mr. Bamidele Agbede (Ekiti State), Mr. Jani Bello (Gombe State), Dr. Taiye Ilayasu (Kwara State), Dr. Bunmi Omoseyindemi (Lagos State).⁣

    Others are Yahaya Bello (Nasarawa State), Prof. Mohammed Yalwa (Niger State), Dr. Anugbum Onuoha (Rivers State) and Abubakar Dambo (Zamfara State). ⁣

    Wednesday’s appointments are by the powers vested in the Office of the President “by Section 154 (1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999, Amended) and Section 6 of the Electoral Act (2022),” Ngelale noted.

     

     

    Tinubu said he expects the new appointees to “abide by the highest standards of professional and ethical conduct in the discharge of their duties, in accordance with his determination to facilitate the establishment of a new and sustainable standard of transparent, fair and conflict-free electoral conduct in Nigeria.

     

  • Presidential tussle: 7 Supreme Court Justices to determine Tinubu, Atiku, Obi’s fate

    Presidential tussle: 7 Supreme Court Justices to determine Tinubu, Atiku, Obi’s fate

    The Supreme Court will on Thursday, settle the legal dispute that has been trailing the presidential election that was held in the country on February 25.

    Though five petitions were initially entered against the declaration of President Bola Tinubu of the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, as the winner of the presidential contest that involved 17 candidates, however, only three of the petitions made it to the apex court..

    Whereas two of the petitions were withdrawn before they could even be heard by the Presidential Election Petition Court, PEPC, that held its proceedings at the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal, of the three petitions that were entered at the Supreme Court, only two of them made it to the last lap of the litigation.

     

    A seven-man panel of the apex court had last Monday, dismissed the case the Allied Peoples Movement, APM, instituted to nullify President Tinubu’s election victory, after the party reluctantly withdrew its appeal which the panel insisted was academic and of no useful legal purpose.

     

    Consequently, the surviving appeals were the ones filed by a former Vice President and candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, as well as his counterpart in the Labour Party, LP, Mr. Peter Obi.

     

    The apex court reserved the to appeals for judgement after all the parties adopted their final briefs of argument past Monday.

     

    Meanwhile, examines the profile of the seven Justices of the Supreme Court that will determine the fate of Tinubu, Atiku and Obi, tomorrow.

    Justice John Inyang Okoro

    Justice Okoro is the head of the panel that will decide the petitions seeking to remove President Tinubu from office.

     

    He was born on July 11, 1959 in Nung Ukim, Ikono Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State.

    He attended Methodist School, Nung Ukim from 1965-1972, Boys High School, Oron from 1973-1977, School of Arts &Science, Uyo 1979-1981 and the University of Lagos from 1981-1984.

    He attended the Nigerian Law School, Lagos and was called to the Nigerian Bar in 1985.

     

    Justice Okoro started his legal career as Magistrate Grade 11 in 1986 and rose through the Magisterial Cadre culminating in his promotion to the post of Chief Magistrate Grade 1 in 1996.

     

    He was then appointed a Judge of the High Court of Akwa Ibom State from 1998-2006. His Lordship was elevated to the Court of Appeal in 2006 and served in that capacity up to 2013.

     

    He has over the years served in different capacities and bodies, including; Member, Election Petition Tribunal, Kano, 1998, Member, Governorship and Legislative Houses Election Petition Tribunal, Ondo State, 2003, Member, Governorship and Legislative Houses Election Petition Tribunal No.2 Delta State, 2003.

    He has also attended several seminars, workshops and conferences both locally and internationally.

     

    Justice Okoro was elevated to the Supreme Court on November 15, 2013.

     

    He is currently the fourth most senior justice of the court.

     

    Justice Uwani Musa Abba-Aji

    Justice Abba Aji is the most ranking female jurist on the apex court bench and the only female of the panel.

     

    She was born on November 7, 1956, in Gashua, Yobe State. She attended Central Primary School Gashua and Government Girls Secondary School Maiduguri for her Primary and Secondary Education between 1961 and 1972.

    She obtained a Diploma in Law from Ahmadu Bello University Zaria in 1976 and subsequently, an L.L.B Hons from the same institution in 1980. She was called to Bar in 1981 and commenced her career as State Counsel in 1982.

     

    Justice Abba-Aji previously held positions of Clerical Assistant (Area Courts Division), Assistant Registrar, Acting Registrar and Higher Registrar between 1973 and 1982. After her appointment as State Counsel in 1982, she rose through various positions becoming an Acting Senior State Counsel in 1984, Senior Magistrate II in 1986, Senior Magistrate I in 1987, Chief Magistrate II in 1989, Chief Magistrate I in 1991 and Chief Registrar in November 1991.

     

    She was appointed Higher Court Judge of Yobe State Judiciary in December 1991 making her the first Lady Judge at Yobe State Judiciary, a position she held until July 2004 when she was elevated to the Court of Appeal.

     

    Before her elevation to the Supreme Court on January 8, 2019, Justice Abba-Aji was the Presiding Justice, Court of Appeal Kaduna .

    Justice Mohammed Lawal Garba

    Justice Mohammed Lawal Garba was born on November 16, 1958. He hails from Gusau Local Government Area of Zamfara State.

    He attended Demonstration Primary School, Maru from 1965-1971, Government Secondary School, Gusau from 1972 -1976, School of Basic Studies Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria from 1976-1977, Faculty of Law, A.B.U, Zaria from 1977-1980, Nigerian Law School, Lagos, from 1980-1981 and the Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (UNILAG) Akoka, Lagos in 1989.

     

    He was called to the Nigerian Bar in 1981.

     

    He served as Magistrate in the Sokoto State Judiciary from 1982-1986, Deputy Chief Registrar High Court of Justice, Sokoto State from 1989-1991, appointed Solicitor-General/Director-General Ministry of Justice Sokoto State from 1991-1993.

     

    He was then appointed a Judge of the High Court of Justice, Sokoto State from 1993-1996. He served as Chief Judge, High Court of Justice, Zamfara State from 1996-2004.

     

    In 2004, Justice Garba was elevated to the Court of Appeal and served at various times as the Presiding Justice at Abuja, Calabar, Port Harcourt and Lagos Divisions of the Court from 2010-2020.

     

    He has over the years, served on different capacities and bodies, including as; Member Body of Benchers from 1996-2004, Member, Board of Governors of the National Judicial Institute (NJI), Abuja 1996-2004, Member, Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee (LPPC) 1997-1999, Member Body of Benchers 2010 to date, Life Bencher 2018 to date.

     

    Remarkably, he served as a member of the Presidential Election Panel in 2011 and also as Chairman of the Presidential Election Panel that dismissed the petition that Atiku filed to challenge the election of former President Muhammadu Buhari, in 2019.

     

    He was elevated to the Supreme Court on November 6, 2020.

     

    Justice Ibrahim Saulawa

    Justice Saulawa was born on September 29, 1956 in the ancient city of Katsina. Katina State. He attended both Primary and Secondary Schools in Katsina from 1965 to 1976 after which he proceeded to the Bayero University Kano in September 1977 and graduated in June 1981 with a Bachelor of Law degree.

     

    The same year, he proceeded to the Nigerian Law School Lagos and was eventually called to the Nigerian Bar on July 2, 1982.

    He began his career with the Ministry of Justice, Kaduna State in August 1982 as a Pupil State Counsel (NYSC: (ii) Secretary, Law Officers (Attorneys – General) Committee of the then 10 Northern States; (iii) a Visiting Lecturer, College of Legal and Extra-Mural Studies, Katsina Polytechnic, Katsina 1982-83

     

    He a short private practice, he was made a Magistrate Grade 2 in the Kaduna State Judiciary on September 1, 1983

     

    He served as Chief Magistrate, Katsina State Judiciary, 1987 – 1991; Deputy Chief Registrar/ Chief Registrar, Court of Appeal Lagos 1991 – 1994, High Court Judge, Katsina State Judiciary 1994 – 2006.

     

    Justice Saulawa was elevated to the Bench of the Court of Appeal on June 10. 2006.

     

    He subsequently served as Presiding Justice: Calaber Judicial Division October, 2015 – August. 2018;

    Ilorin Judicial Division – September, 2018 – January, 2020 and Port Harcourt Judicial Division – January, 2020 – November 9, 2020.

     

    Justice Saulawa was elevated to the Bench of the Supreme Court on November 10, 2020.

     

    Justice Adamu Jauro

    Justice Adamu Jauro was born on June 26, 1959. He hails from Gombe State. He attended Central Primary School, Gombe, Government Secondary School, Bauchi and the School of Basic Science, Zaria.

     

    In 1980, he studied Law at the Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria where he bagged his LLB.

     

    Justice Jauro holds a master’s degree in Law from the University of Jos and also has a certificate from the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies.

     

     

    After he was called to Bar, Jauro worked with the Ministry of Justice in 1983 and was promoted as Director of Public Prosecution.

     

    He served in various capacities before being appointed as a judge of the Gombe State Judiciary where he served till 2007.

     

    In 2007, he was promoted to the Court of Appeal and served in Jos, Lagos, Yola, Ibadan and Port Harcourt.

     

    Justice Jauro was elevated to the Supreme Court bench in November 2020.

     

    Justice Tijjani Abubakar

    Justice Tijjani Abubakar, who is a native of Base Local Government Area of Yobe State, was born on April 15, 1960.

     

    He attended Gashua Central Primary School and Government Secondary School, Gashua.

     

    He later attended the School of Basic Science, University of Maiduguri as well as the University of Maiduguri where he studied Law and graduated in 1982.

     

    After graduating from the Nigerian Law School, Justice Abubakar was called to the Bar in 1983.

     

    He had worked as Attorney General, Permanent Secretary and Commissioner for Justice of Yobe State at various times.

     

    He subsequently went into private practice and set up his own law firm, known as Tijani Abubakar and Co. in 2004.

     

    Abubakar returned to public practice with his appointment as a judge of the Federal High Court.

     

    In 2012, he was appointed as Justice of the Court of Appeal.

     

    He was serving at the Lagos Division of the appellate the court when he was elevated to the Supreme Court bench in 2020.

     

    Justice Emmanuel Agim

    Justice Emmanuel Agim was born on April 26, 1960, in Obudu, Cross Rivers State.

     

    He obtained his first degree, LLB, at University of Calabar, then BL from the Nigerian Law School, Lagos, and subsequently, LLM, from the University of Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.

     

    After serving as President of the Court of Appeal of The Gambia, and three years as Chief Justice of The Gambia, Justice Agim was later sworn in as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Swaziland on May 2, 2012 where he served in the first all-black bench in the history of Swaziland and her sister countries- Botswana and Lesotho.

     

    On November 5, 2012, he was sworn in as a Justice of the Court of Appeal of Nigeria by the first female Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Aloma Mariam Mukhtar.

     

    In October 2019, he was elevated to the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

     

    It be recalled that both Justice Agim and Justice Jauro, were the two members of the apex court bench that gave dissenting judgements that would have dashed hopes of the immediate past Senate President, Ahmed Lawan to contest the 2023 general election.

     

    The duo, contrary to the position of the head of the panel, late Justice Centus Nweze and two other members of the panel, maintained that Lawan was not qualified to contest the Yobe North Senatorial election.

     

    The gave their judgement in favour of Bashir Machina, stressing that Lawan was not the validly nominated candidate of the APC for the senatorial contest.

     

    Notwithstanding the dissenting judgements of Justices Agim and Jauro, Lawan still survived the sledgehammer as the majority decision of three other members of the panel, favoured him.